Income tax: commercial debt forgiveness - does the exclusion for debts forgiven for reasons of natural love and affection require that the creditor be a natural person?
Yes - the exclusion for debts forgiven for reasons of natural love and affection requires that the creditor is a natural person.
Paragraph 245-40(e) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 [1] excludes a debt forgiven for reasons of natural love and affection from the application of the commercial debt forgiveness provisions. [2]
The context of paragraph 245-40(e) requires a direct causal nexus between the forgiveness and the natural love and affection, and the natural love and affection must arise in consequence of ordinary human interaction. For this to occur, the creditor must be a natural person and the object of their love and affection must be one or more other natural persons. Where the conditions for the exclusion are otherwise satisfied, there is no requirement that the debtor must be a natural person.
Subject to paragraph 5 of this Determination, this Determination applies to years of income commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Determination (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10 Public Rulings).
It is recognised that this Determination takes a different view to ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2003/589 Commercial debt forgiveness - can a company forgive a debt for reasons of natural love and affection? (withdrawn on 6 February 2019). The Commissioner will not devote compliance resources to apply the views expressed in this Determination in relation to debts forgiven prior to 6 February 2019 that would have been covered by ATO ID 2003/589. However, if the Commissioner is asked or required to state a view (for example, in a private ruling or in submissions in a litigation matter), the Commissioner will do so consistently with the views set out in this Determination.
Appendix - Explanation
Paragraph 245-40(e) provides that the commercial debt forgiveness provisions do not apply to a debt forgiven for reasons of natural love and affection.
Whether a debt has been forgiven for reasons of natural love and affection necessitates a careful examination of the reasons for forgiving the debt. This is a question of fact and includes taking into account the surrounding circumstances of the debt and the nature of the relationship said to be the subject of the natural love and affection.
The text in paragraph 245-40(e) comprises three elements, whose interaction is important: • The first element requires that there must be 'forgiveness of a debt'. • The second element, 'for reasons of', requires a causal nexus between the first and third element. • The third element, 'natural love and affection', can be characterised as a limitation on the first element.
The use of the phrase 'forgiveness of a debt' in section 245-40 denotes creditors generally and, read in context, paragraph 245-40(e) indicates that the reasons of natural love and affection must be those of the creditor.
The second element is comprised in the phrase 'for reasons of', which requires a causal nexus between the forgiveness and the natural love and affection. It is not sufficient that there is forgiveness of the debt and there is natural love and affection. The forgiveness must be because of the natural love and affection. [3] The Commissioner takes the view that the causal nexus requires that the forgiveness be for the reason of the natural love and affection felt by the creditor for another natural person.
The third element in paragraph 245-40(e) is the phrase 'natural love and affection', which has both a legal meaning and an ordinary meaning. No contrary intention appears from the text or context of paragraph 245-40(e) to displace the presumption that the Commonwealth Parliament intended the term to have these ordinary and legal meanings.
The ordinary meaning of this phrase imports strong emotions of caring, fondness and attachment that arise in consequence of ordinary human interaction. The term's legal meaning refers to goodwill towards, or emotional attachment to, another person, particularly that of a parent to their children. [4]
In testing the state of mind of a creditor to establish the presence of natural love and affection, a number of factors may be relevant including past dealings, existing relationships and future intentions. Whether natural love and affection is present in a relationship can only be determined on a case-by-case basis.
In the context of a conveyance, the phrase 'natural love and affection' ordinarily arises between family members where the making of a gift could constitute good consideration, although not valuable consideration. Ordinarily, it is considerations of moral obligation or emotional willingness, irrespective of self-interest, which are the catalyst for the relevant action, rather than a promise of something in return. [5]
This interpretation is further supported by considering the elements of paragraph 245-40(e) as a whole. The notion of forgiveness is confined by the use of 'natural love and affection'. That term serves to identify the motivation for the forgiveness. The requisite connection between that motivation and the forgiveness can only be satisfied when the creditor feels the natural love and affection for some other natural person. That is, an entity that is not a natural person cannot feel natural love and affection.
As the natural love and affection required for paragraph 245-40(e) to operate must arise in consequence of ordinary human interaction, the object of the creditor's natural love and affection that is the reason for the debt forgiveness must be another natural person.
However, paragraph 245-40(e) does not further require that the object of the creditor's natural love and affection is also the debtor.
Accordingly, paragraph 245-40(e) is capable of applying in circumstances where the debtor is not a natural person (for example, a company). It still remains necessary to establish that the creditor forgave the debt for reasons of natural love and affection, notwithstanding the debtor was not the object of that sentiment (for example, where a parent forgives a debt owed by a company that is 100% owned by their child).
The reasons for a creditor's decision to forgive a debt (the second element in paragraph 245-40(e)) need to be determined on a case-by-case basis. That is, taking into account the surrounding circumstances, it is necessary to identify that the creditor's natural love and affection for a person (who may not be the debtor) motivated the creditor's decision to forgive the debt.
A natural person may forgive a debt in their capacity as a trustee of a trust, or as a partner in a partnership. It is possible that the conditions in paragraph 245-40(e) would be satisfied where the natural love and affection of that person motivates the forgiveness of a debt owed to the trust or partnership respectively.
However, the cases where this could happen would be limited. The acts that an individual may take in their capacity as a trustee or as a partner are subject to limitations that arise under trust and partnership law principles [6] , statute [7] and the terms of any trust deed or partnership agreement. Accordingly, within the scope of a particular trust or partnership relationship, a trustee or partner may not be permitted to forgive a debt owed to the respective trust or partnership for reasons of natural love and affection.
Appendix 2 - Alternative view
An alternative view that has been put to the Commissioner is that a debt forgiven by a non-individual creditor can come within the application of paragraph 245-45(e).
Proponents of this view argue that paragraph 245-40(e) specifies only that the debt is forgiven for reasons of natural love and affection. It does not expressly stipulate that the creditor forgiving the debt must feel the requisite love and affection. Consequently, the love and affection underpinning the forgiveness can effectively be traced through the creditor, to the ultimate individual.
The Commissioner does not accept this alternative view. The Commissioner considers that the provision, when read in full and in context, does require the natural love and affection to be felt by the creditor. [8]
Compendium
The ATO published responses to 3 submissions on this ruling in TD 2022/1EC. Outcome labels are heuristic — read the ATO response for the detail.
1A more detailed discussion and exploration of the issues should be developed, preferably in the form of a public ruling. The discussion should explore the following sets of circumstances: • where the creditor is a natural person • where the creditor is a company • where the debt is forgiven in the context of a trust relationship, considering the variations between when the trustee is a natural person and when the trustee is a corporate trustee, and • where the debt is forgiven in the context of a partnership.accepted
ATO response
The final Determination sufficiently explains the basis on which the Commissioner considers paragraph 245-40(e) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 [1] requires that the creditor is a natural person. This necessarily means that paragraph 245-40(e) cannot apply where the creditor is a company. Paragraphs 20 and 21 of the final Determination have been added to address the application of paragraph 245-40(e) where the debt is forgiven by a natural person in their capacity as a trustee, or as a partner in a partnership.
2The Determination should explore in more detail which parties the natural love and affection is between, including whether the debtor also needs to be a natural person for the exception to apply.response provided
ATO response
Paragraph 3 of the final Determination has been updated to confirm there is no requirement for the debtor to be a natural person. Paragraphs 16 to 19 of the final Determination explain the basis on which paragraph 245-40(e) is capable of applying in circumstances where the debtor is not a natural person.