Preamble
Subsection 230-50(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) [1] applies if an equity interest satisfies both subsections 230-50(1) and 230-45(1).
This Determination applies to years of income commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Determination (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).
Appendix 1 - Explanation
For Division 230 to apply to a gain or loss, it is necessary to identify a financial arrangement. A financial arrangement is the unit of taxation for Division 230. Subsections 230-45(1), 230-50(1) and 230-50(2) provide tests which specify when you have a financial arrangement.
Section 230-45 is the general test. Pursuant to subsection 230-45(1), you have a financial arrangement if you have, under an arrangement identified pursuant to subsection 230-55(4), a cash settlable right to receive or obligation to provide a financial benefit, or a combination of such rights and/or obligations, unless, broadly, you have not insignificant other rights to receive or obligations to provide something which is not a financial benefit, or the other rights or obligations are not cash settlable. Subsection 230-45(2) specifies the circumstances in which a right to receive or obligation to provide a financial benefit that you have is cash settlable.
Section 230-50 provides two further tests for having a financial arrangement. Subsection 230-50(2), in a similar way to section 230-45, specifies criteria pursuant to which certain rights and/or obligations, under an arrangement identified by subsection 230-55(4), are a financial arrangement.
Subsection 230-50(1), on the other hand, provides that an equity interest, as defined, constitutes the financial arrangement. The term 'equity interest' is defined in Subdivision 974-C [2] for an equity interest in a company, and in section 820-930 [3] for an equity interest for a partnership or trust.
Certain arrangements may satisfy both subsections 230-45(1) and 230-50(1). In this event it is necessary to determine which subsection takes precedence as Division 230 has limited operation in relation to section 230-50 financial arrangements.
The operation of Division 230 is limited or modified for 'a financial arrangement under section 230-50' in the following provisions: [4] • paragraph 230-5(2)(b) (guide); • paragraph 230-40(4)(e) - accruals/realisation; • subsection 230-270(1) - foreign exchange retranslation; • subsection 230-300(7) - hedging in relation to a foreign currency hedge you issue; • subsection 230-330(1) - (when read with subsection 230-330(2)) hedging in relation to a foreign currency hedge you issue; • paragraph 230-410(1)(d) - financial reports election where you are required to classify or designate, in the financial reports, the asset or liability at fair value through profit and loss; • paragraph 230-440(1)(a) - balancing adjustment.
In summary, a section 230-50 financial arrangement is not subject to the following methods for calculating gains and losses from a financial arrangement: • accruals and realisation; • foreign exchange retranslation; • hedging financial arrangements method (except to the extent it is a foreign currency hedge issued by you); • fair value method for an equity interest which is issued by you; • financial reports method for an equity interest which is issued by you. That is to say, Division 230 applies to an equity interest only where it is: • subject to the fair value method and is an equity interest you hold; • subject to the financial reports method and is an equity interest you hold; • subject to the hedging financial arrangements method and is an equity interest that you issue and is a foreign currency hedge. [5]
An equity interest that is cash settlable will satisfy subsection 230-50(1) and may also satisfy subsection 230-45(1). In these circumstances, subsection 230-50(1) applies in preference to subsection 230-45(1).
Division 230 has been designed to ensure that not all tax-treatment methods apply to equity financial arrangements. This purpose should be given effect to irrespective of whether the equity financial arrangement also satisfies the requirements of a cash settlable financial arrangement.
The structure of the Division is that a broader range of things are included within the provisions, and then there are things excluded from the set of things included, and so on. So, for example, equity interests in partnerships and trusts are included as financial arrangements under subsection 230-50(1), then, broadly, paragraph 230-460(3)(b) [6] excludes them, then subsection 230-460(4) is an exception to that exclusion in relation to financial arrangements the subject of a fair value or financial reports election which are therefore re-included, and then, of such re-included financial arrangements, sub-sections 230-225(1) and 230-415(1) exclude issued equity financial arrangements. That leaves held trust and partnership equity interest financial arrangements the subject of a fair value or financial reports election as being subject to Division 230. From this structure, an inference can be drawn that the limited application purpose for section 230-50 financial arrangements ought to take precedence over the purpose that Division 230 ought to apply to all cash settlable financial arrangements. The structure is such that the exclusions and modifications that apply to equity interests are impressed upon the initial general inclusion. [7]
The conclusion that section 230-50(1) applies in preference to subsection 230-45(1) (where both are satisfied) is consistent with the statement in section 230-5 that: (2) This Division does not apply to all financial arrangements. The main exceptions are if: ... (b) the arrangement is a financial arrangement under section 230-50 (equity interests etc.) and neither a fair value election, a hedging financial arrangement election nor an election to rely on financial reports applies to the arrangement.
With respect to a convertible note, Example 2.17 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Taxation of Financial Arrangements) Bill 2008 explains that where the convertible note is a cash settlable financial arrangement and an equity financial arrangement the convertible note is only subject to the limited operation of Division 230: Continuation of Example 2.2 - Convertible note (cash settlable financial arrangement ) Hamish Co's convertible note is a cash settlable financial arrangement. This is because under this arrangement Hamish has the right to receive cash coupon payments, and the ability to redeem the note upon maturity by receiving a payment of money, and Hamish Co did not have the sole or dominant purpose when entering into the arrangement of receiving the shares on conversion instead (subsection 230-45(1) and paragraph 230-45(2)(g)). If Hamish Co's convertible note is also an equity interest , it will satisfy the definition of an 'equity financial arrangement' (see subsection 230-50(1)), and therefore will only be subject to a limited operation of Division 230 (refer to discussion on the limited operation of Division 230 to 'equity financial arrangements').
Compendium
The ATO published responses to 1 submission on this ruling in TD 2011/12EC. Outcome labels are heuristic — read the ATO response for the detail.
1The draft Determination refers to Example 2.17 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Taxation of Financial Arrangements) Bill 2008 (the Explanatory Memorandum). It is presumed the example is referring to a convertible note where the issuer has the option to convert to shares. A different result would occur where the convertible note is a debt interest (that is, the holder has the option to convert). In such a case, because of paragraph 230-50(2)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) [1] , the arrangement will be a section 230-45 financial arrangement.accepted
ATO response
Example 2.17 is a continuation of Example 2.2 in the Explanatory Memorandum. The convertible note in Example 2.2 is one which at maturity provides Hamish Co with an option to convert the note and receive ordinary shares in the company. It is beyond the scope of the Determination to express a view on when a convertible note would be an equity interest under Division 974, or to clarify rights and obligations arising in Example 2.17. Our view is that it is unnecessary to set out factors relevant to the operation of Division 974 in order to express the ATO view of the interaction between subsection 230-45(1) and subsection 230-50(1). Although the Explanatory Memorandum example states that the issuer has an obligation to return Hamish Co's investment at maturity, which could provide a basis for construing the investment as a debt, at the end of the example it is hypothesised that the convertible note is an equity interest.