STATEMENT
Where an entity is entitled to a refund of an RBA surplus or excess non-RBA credits, subsection 8AAZLH (3) of the TAA gives the Commissioner a discretion to direct that refunds be 'paid to the entity in a different way'. Prior to the issue of this law administration practice statement, the Commissioner exercised this discretion, in appropriate cases, to direct that refunds be made by cheque where the entity had not nominated a complying institution account.
The Commissioner will now also exercise this discretion to direct that electronic refunds be paid into a nominated third party account when authorised to do so by the entity.
The discretion to make an electronic refund to a nominated third party account may be exercised where the following criteria are satisfied: • the overall policy intent of section 8AAZLH is maintained (refer to paragraph 11) • there is a significant legal relationship between the entity entitled to the refund and the entity (third party) into whose financial institution account it will be paid, • the nominated account is maintained at an office or branch of a financial institution in Australia, • the entity entitled to the refund gives the Commissioner a clear authority to pay the refund to the nominated financial institution account, and • there is a legislative requirement, a standard industry or commercial practice, or a legal reason for the refund to be paid to that third party.
The Commissioner will exercise his discretion to direct a refund to third party accounts which satisfy the criteria in paragraph 3, where the account is held by: • a parent entity or nominated member entity for a related group of entities including special purpose entities, • a manager, custodian, administrator or agent charged with the responsibility of managing some financial aspects of a large number of separate entities such as, strata titles, property trusts, managed investment funds or superannuation funds, • a trustee in the capacity as trustee for a number of trusts, or • a representative of an incapacitated entity eg a liquidator or receiver.
EXPLANATION
Section 8AAZLH was originally enacted to provide for the mandatory electronic payment of refunds of RBA surpluses or related credits. Refunds were permitted to be paid into any financial institution account nominated by the entity entitled to the refund. The Commissioner was given the power to pay the refund in another way, for example, by cheque.
To reduce the risk of fraudulent claims, subsection 8AAZLH (2) was amended to restrict the nominated account to one that is held at a branch or office of a financial institution in Australia. A later amendment inserted subsection 8AAZLH (2A) to further restrict the accounts into which refunds could be paid. Subsection 8AAZLH (5) was also inserted to clarify that the Commonwealth's debt to the entity is extinguished when the Commissioner pays the refund into the nominated account.
To comply with subsection 8AAZLH (2A), the entity can only nominate an account: • held by the entity entitled to the refund; or • jointly held by that entity with other entities; or • held by the registered tax agent of the entity; or • held by a legal practitioner acting as a trustee or executor for the entity.
'Held by the entity' means that the entity: • is the legal owner of the account • has satisfied the financial institution's 'Proof of Identity' requirements with regard to opening the account, and • is identified in the records associated with the account as having a legal entitlement or control over any monies held in the account.
The term entity includes an individual, partnership, company, entity in the capacity as a trustee of a trust, a government agency or a corporation sole.
The term 'legal practitioner' means a barrister or solicitor admitted to practice under relevant State or Territory law. It does not extend to a person who has a degree in law but is not qualified to practice. Under subsection 8AAZLH (2A), the legal practitioner must be acting as a trustee or executor for the entity. The subsection does not extend to general representation.
The overall policy intent of the legislation is that a surplus or credit should be refunded in such a way as to reduce administration and compliance costs without increasing opportunities for fraud. In order to achieve this, the Commissioner will generally refund monies into accounts held by the taxpayer. However, in cases where the Commissioner is satisfied that there is a low risk of fraud he may, under subsection 8AAZLH (3) of the TAA, pay a surplus or refund to the account of a properly authorised nominee.
A refund may be paid into the financial institution account of: • a parent entity or nominated member entity for a related group of entities including special purpose entities • a manager, custodian, administrator or agent charged with the responsibility of managing some financial aspects of a large number of separate entities such as, strata titles, property trusts, managed investment funds or superannuation funds • a trustee for a number of trusts, or • a representative of an incapacitated entity eg a liquidator or receiver.
Such refunds will only be paid where • the overall policy intent of section 8AAZLH is maintained, • there is a significant legal relationship between the entity entitled to the refund and the entity (third party) into whose financial institution account it will be paid, • the nominated account is maintained at an office or branch of a financial institution in Australia, • there is clear authority from the entity entitled to the refund to pay to the nominated financial institution account, and • there is a legislative requirement, or a standard industry or commercial practice, or a legal reason for the refund to be paid to that third party.
Subsection 8AAZLH (5) of the TAA states that the Commissioner will satisfy his obligation to pay the refund when he pays the moneys to the credit of an account nominated by the entity. If the entity wishes to revoke their authority for the Commissioner to pay to a third party account, they must advise the Commissioner.