Preamble
Yes, a 'farming business' can be carried on for the purposes of paragraph 38-480(a) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act), [1] where there has been a cessation of routine farming activities by the supplier for a period of time in anticipation of a sale. Whether a farming business continues to be carried on is a question of fact and degree depending on the circumstances of each particular case.
Under section 38-480, the supply of a freehold interest in, or the lease by an Australian government agency of or the long-term lease of, land is GST-free if: (a) the land is land on which a farming business has been carried on for at least the period of five years preceding the supply; and (b) the recipient of the supply intends that a farming business be carried on, on the land.
The definite article 'the' in the expression 'the period of five years' in paragraph 38-480(a) indicates that the period in which a farming business must be carried on, on the land, is a continuous period of five years immediately before the supply of the land. This is distinct from the expression 'a period of five years preceding the supply' which may refer to any period of five years before the supply of the land.
A farming business is defined in subsection 38-475(2). [2] Specifically, an entity carries on a farming business if it carries on a business [3] of one of the classes of farming listed under paragraphs (a) to (d) in subsection 38-475(2). If an entity carries on a business consisting of one of the classes of farming, the entity is carrying on an enterprise that is a farming business. This is because paragraph 9-20(1)(a) provides that an enterprise is an activity or series of activities done in the form of a business.
Carrying on an enterprise is defined in section 195-1 to include 'anything done in the course of the commencement or termination of the enterprise'. Accordingly, for the purposes of paragraph 38-480(a), carrying on a farming business includes all the routine farming activities carried out on the land together with any other activities related to commencing, conducting and terminating the farming business. [4] The routine farming activities refer to the physical activities undertaken on the land relevant to the classes of farming in subsection 38-475(2).
In the course of selling land on which a farming business has been carried on, the seller may cease the routine farming activities in anticipation of the sale. The cessation of these farming activities does not necessarily result in the cessation of the farming business being carried on, on the land. It may be something done in the course of terminating the farming business; accordingly the farming business may still be carried on.
An enterprise terminates when the activities related to the enterprise cease. Ordinarily, this occurs when all the enterprise assets are disposed of, or converted to another purpose or use, and all the obligations of the enterprise are satisfied, for example, the finalisation of accounts, preparation of activity statements, payment of creditors and the cancellation of business registrations. [5]
Shahrin has been carrying on a farming business of cultivating fruit on her land for more than five years. The routine farming activities involve maintaining fruit trees, clearing the land and harvesting the fruit for sale. Shahrin decides that she no longer wishes to carry on her fruit farming business. She offers her land for sale and ceases the routine farming activities conducted on the land. In the course of doing all the things necessary to terminate her farming business, Shahrin sells the land .
For the purposes of paragraph 38-480(a), Shahrin continues to carry on a farming business on her land up until the sale of the land. The sale of the land may be GST-free under section 38-480 if the other requirements of the section are met .
Sacha has been carrying on a farming business of maintaining animals for sale for more than five years. During that time, the farming business has been conducted on two large blocks of land. Sacha decides to downsize the business and to sell one of the blocks of land. Sacha ceases her routine farming activities on the block of land she is selling. Sacha then sells the land while she continues to carry on her farming business on the other block of land .
For the purposes of paragraph 38-480(a), Sacha continues to carry on a farming business on the land up until the sale of that land. The sale of the land may be GST-free under section 38-480 if the other requirements of the section are met .
There are circumstances in which the enterprise of the farming business could be considered to have terminated before the sale of the land. For instance, if there has been a change in the purpose or use of the land before its sale such that it is used for private purposes or is no longer used in the farming business, or outstanding obligations cannot be satisfied and all other activities relevant to the farming business have ceased. [6]
Matt has been carrying on a vegetable farming business for almost five years. The business is no longer profitable and Matt decides not to continue operating the business. In the subsequent six months, Matt ceases all the routine farming activities on the land, sells off the farming equipment and finalises all his obligations in relation to the farming business. Matt then rents the land to a neighbour for a purpose that is not related to a farming business. After three months, Matt sells the land to another entity .
No farming business has been carried on, on the land, for that three month period before the land is sold. Therefore, the sale of the land is not GST-free under section 38-480 because the land is not land on which a farming business has been carried on for the period of five years preceding the supply .
This Determination applies both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Determination (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).
Compendium
The ATO published responses to 3 submissions on this ruling in GSTD 2011/2EC. Outcome labels are heuristic — read the ATO response for the detail.
11.1 - Fully agree with the draft Determination. 1.2 - Suggest that 'a' on the last line of draft Determination paragraph 14 be changed to 'the' to be consistent with draft Determination paragraph 3.accepted
Raised by Entity 1
ATO response
1.1 - Comment noted. 1.2 - Paragraph 14 of this Determination has been amended accordingly.
2It is not clear if there is a specific or maximum period of time between the cessation of the routine farming activities and the sale of the land before it is considered that a farming business had terminated on the land and the sale is not GST-free.response provided
Raised by Entity 2
ATO response
Whether a farming business continues to be carried on in these instances is a question of fact and degree that depends on the circumstances of each particular case.
33.1 - The draft Determination suggests that the farming business can be wound down in anticipation of the sale as long as it can be construed that the farming enterprise is still being conducted in that wind down period. In fact, it is not uncommon for the sale of farm land to be one of the steps in winding down an enterprise. Carrying on an enterprise includes the activities of commencement and cessation of the enterprise which supports this view. However, this may not be so clear where the farming entity is a different entity to the supplier of the land. 3.2 - The draft Determination suggests that the farming business must be conducted continuously in the five year period preceding the supply. The specific drafting of paragraph 38-480(a) of the GST Act is sufficient to imply that the farming activities must be continuous for five years before or preceding the supply. 3.3 - The draft Determination is unfortunate as all the examples deal with situations where the farming business operator is also the farm land owner. It would be nice to have an example where this was not the case. 3.4 - There is some debate as to whether the same farming business must be conducted for the whole five year period. The section refers to 'a farming business' but can see no reason why there cannot be several farming businesses. It is not unusual for farmers to cease their business and to sell the farm land to a neighbour who then uses the land in their farming business.