Income tax: proposed Final Capital Return: eircom Holdings Limited

This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates.

The relevant provisions dealt with in this Ruling are: • subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936); • section 45A of the ITAA 1936; • section 45B of the ITAA 1936; • section 45C of the ITAA 1936; • section 104-135 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997); and • Division 855 of the ITAA 1997. All legislative references in this Ruling are to the ITAA 1936 unless otherwise stated.

The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is the ordinary shareholders of eircom Holdings Limited (ERC), formerly Babcock and Brown Capital Limited, who: (a) are registered on the ERC share register on the Record Date, being the date for determining entitlements under the proposed return of capital (Final Capital Return) as described in paragraphs 10 to 22 of this Ruling; and (b) hold their shares on capital account.

The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling.

The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 10 to 22 of this Ruling.

If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: • this Ruling has no binding effect on the Commissioner because the scheme entered into is not the scheme on which the Commissioner has ruled; and • this Ruling may be withdrawn or modified.

This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Copyright Law Branch Attorney-General's Department National Circuit Barton ACT 2600 or posted at: http://www.ag.gov.au/cca

This Ruling applies from 14 September 2009 to 30 June 2010. The Ruling continues to apply after 30 June 2010 to all entities within the specified class who entered into the specified scheme during the term of the Ruling. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).

• CR 2009/7 - Income tax: return of capital: Babcock and Brown Capital Limited • CR 2009/54 - Income tax: proposed return of capital: Eircom Holdings Limited

The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. The following documents, or relevant parts of them, form part of and are to be read with the description: • application for Class Ruling dated 7 October 2009, together with its appendices; • ERC's Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) Release dated 10 November 2009; • correspondence from the applicant dated between 16 October and 10 November 2009.

ERC is an Australian resident public company. ERC listed on the ASX on 14 February 2005 after a successful initial public offering (IPO) to raise equity of $1 billion. ERC was previously named Babcock and Brown Capital Limited and changed its name to eircom Holdings Limited on 27 April 2009.

ERC invested a substantial proportion of the capital raised in the IPO in the eircom and Golden Pages investments. Following refinancing of these investments, some of this initial capital was returned to ERC. The cash resources which ERC currently has are attributable to the initial capital raised on listing that remains after previous capital returns.

Having disposed of the Golden Pages investment on 26 October 2009, ERC now has two assets: • A 57.1% interest in eircom Group Limited (eircom). As at 30 June 2009, ERC's 57.1% investment in eircom has been written down to nil on the ERC balance sheet. • Cash of approximately $32 million, prior to implementation of the Scheme. After taking into account contingent payments of approximately $8 million and the Final Capital Return of $24.3 million, ERC will have minimal cash post implementation of the capital return.

On 14 September 2009 ERC entered into a Scheme Implementation Agreement with STT Communications Limited and Emerald Communications (Cayman) SPC (ECC), pursuant to which ECC will acquire the entire issued share capital of ERC. The acquisition is to be effected by way of a Court approved Scheme of Arrangement (Scheme).

If the proposed Scheme is implemented, ERC shareholders on the Record Date will receive from: • ERC: the Final Capital Return of $0.145 for each ERC share held on the Record Date (Capital Reduction Amount); and • ECC: a choice in respect of the ERC Shares they hold on the Record Date between, subject to the Minimum Scrip Election Condition and the Scale back: - Cash consideration of $0.40 per ERC share (Cash Consideration); - Scrip Consideration of one ECC share (Scrip Consideration); - Scrip Consideration for a specified percentage of ERC Shares held by the ERC shareholder and Cash Consideration for the remaining ERC Shares held by the ERC shareholder. The cash consideration and capital reduction amount when added together represent $0.545 per ERC share.

The funds for the proposed Final Capital Return will not be sourced from profits. As at 30 June 2009, ERC as a stand alone entity had accumulated losses of $524.6 million with accumulated losses of $1,488 million on a consolidated basis.

ERC has never declared a dividend to its shareholders and the sole purpose of the Final Capital Return by ERC is to return excess capital to its shareholders.

As at 30 June 2009, ERC had available franking credits of $7.2 million.

As at 7 October 2009, ERC had 167,904,914 shares on issue.

ERC's share capital account is not tainted within the meaning of Division 197 of the ITAA 1997.

Shares in ERC are not an 'indirect Australian real property interest' (as defined in section 855-25 of the ITAA 1997) for any non-resident shareholder.

CGT event C2 (section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997) will not apply in respect of the proposed Final Capital Return because ERC's shares cannot be traded or transferred after the Record Date. Therefore, a registered ERC shareholder on the Record Date for the proposed Final Capital Return will hold their shares when the capital return is paid.

The proposed Final Capital Return to ERC shareholders will not be a dividend, as defined in subsection 6(1).

The Commissioner will not make a determination under sections 45A or 45B that section 45C applies to the proposed Final Capital Return. Accordingly, no part of the proposed Final Capital Return will be taken to be a dividend for income tax purposes.

CGT event G1 (section 104-135 of the ITAA 1997) will happen when ERC pays the proposed Final Capital Return to an ERC shareholder in respect of an ERC share that they own at the Record Date and continue to own at the payment date.

A foreign resident ERC shareholder who is paid the proposed Final Capital Return disregards any capital gain made when CGT event G1 happens if their ERC shares are not 'taxable Australian property' (section 855-10 of ITAA 1997).

Note: this Ruling does not consider the tax consequences of the cash or scrip consideration offered by ECC under the Scheme.

Subsection 44(1) includes in a shareholder's assessable income any dividends, as defined in subsection 6(1), paid to the shareholders out of profits derived by the company from any source (if the shareholder is a resident of Australia) and from an Australian source (if the shareholder is a non-resident of Australia).

The term 'dividend' is defined in subsection 6(1) and includes any distribution made by a company to any of its shareholders. However, this broad definition is confined by later paragraphs in the definition which expressly excludes certain items from being a dividend for income tax purposes.

Paragraph (d) of the definition 'dividend' in section 6(1) specifically excludes from the definition: ...moneys paid or credited by a company to a shareholder or any other property distributed by a company to shareholders (not being moneys or other property to which this paragraph, by reason of subsection (4), does not apply or moneys paid or credited, or property distributed for the redemption or cancellation of a redeemable preference share) where the amount of the moneys paid or credited, or the amount of the value of the property, is debited against an amount standing to the credit of the share capital account of the company.

The proposed Final Capital Return will be wholly debited against the untainted share capital account of ERC. Therefore, paragraph (d) of the definition of 'dividend' applies and the proposed Final Capital Return will not be a dividend as defined in subsection 6(1).

Sections 45A and 45B are two anti-avoidance provisions which, if they apply, allow the Commissioner to determine that all or part of a distribution is treated as an unfranked dividend that is paid by the company out of profits to the shareholder.

Section 45A applies where capital benefits are streamed to some shareholders (the Advantaged Shareholders), who would derive a greater benefit from the capital benefits than other shareholders (the Disadvantaged Shareholders) and these Disadvantaged Shareholders receive, or are likely to receive, dividends.

A reference to the 'provision of a capital benefit to a shareholder in a company' is defined in subsection 45A(3) to include the distribution to the shareholder of share capital. The proposed Final Capital Return in the present case by ERC to its shareholders will constitute the provision of a capital benefit. However, as ERC will make the proposed Final Capital Return to all of its shareholders in respect of their ordinary shares it is considered that there will be no streaming of capital benefits to some shareholders and not to others.

Therefore, section 45A will have no application in respect of the proposed Final Capital Return. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45A(2) that section 45C applies in relation to the whole, or a part, of the capital benefit.

Section 45B applies where certain capital payments are paid to shareholders in substitution for dividends. It allows the Commissioner to make a determination that section 45C applies to a capital benefit. The effect of such a determination is that all or part of the distribution of capital received by the shareholder under the return of capital is treated as an unfranked dividend.

In broad terms, section 45B applies where: (a) there is a scheme under which a person is provided with a capital benefit by a company (paragraph 45B(2)(a)); (b) under the scheme, a taxpayer, who may or may not be the person provided with the capital benefit, obtains a tax benefit (paragraph 45B(2)(b)); and (c) having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for a purpose (whether or not the dominant purpose but not including an incidental purpose), of enabling a taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit (paragraph 45B(2)(c)).

Under the present scheme, ERC proposes to make a distribution of share capital to all of the ERC shareholders, which will constitute the provision of a capital benefit in accordance with paragraph 45B(5)(b).

Pursuant to subsection 45B(9), it is likely that each of the ERC shareholders, to which this Ruling applies, will obtain a tax benefit due to the capital benefit being assessed at a later time via the CGT regime, rather than being assessed immediately under subsection 44(1) as a dividend.

However, having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it cannot be concluded that either ERC or the ERC shareholders will enter into or carry out the proposed scheme for the purpose of enabling the ERC shareholders to obtain a tax benefit. It cannot be said that the proposed Final Capital Return is attributable to profits of ERC. The manner in which the proposed scheme is to be carried out, and the form and substance of the proposed scheme, do not indicate that the proposed capital return will be made in substitution for dividends.

Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45B(3) that section 45C applies to the whole, or a part of the proposed Final Capital Return.

As the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45A(2) or subsection 45B(3) of the ITAA 1936 in relation to the arrangement as described, section 45C of the ITAA 1936 will not deem any part of the proposed Final Capital Return to be an unfranked dividend for the purposes of the ITAA 1936 or of the ITAA 1997.

CGT event G1 will happen when ERC pays the proposed Final Capital Return to an ERC shareholder in respect of a share that they own in ERC at the Record Date and continue to own at the payment date (section 104-135 of the ITAA 1997).

If the proposed Final Capital Return (14.5 cents per share) is equal to or less than the cost base of the ERC share at the payment date, the cost base and reduced cost base of the share will be reduced by the amount of the payment (subsection 104-135(4) of the ITAA 1997).

An ERC shareholder will make a capital gain if the proposed Final Capital Return is more than the cost base of the ERC share (subsection 104-135(3) of the ITAA 1997). The amount of the capital gain is equal to the excess.

If an ERC shareholder makes a capital gain when CGT event G1 happens, the cost base and reduced cost base of the ERC share is reduced to nil. An ERC shareholder cannot make a capital loss when CGT event G1 happens (subsection 104-135(3) of the ITAA 1997).

A capital gain made when CGT event G1 happens will be eligible to be treated as a discount capital gain under Subdivision 115-A of the ITAA 1997 provided that the ERC share was acquired at least 12 months before the event happens (subsection 115-25(1) of the ITAA 1997) and the other conditions of that Subdivision are satisfied.

Under subsection 855-10(1) of the ITAA 1997, an entity disregards a capital gain or capital loss made from a CGT event if they are a foreign resident, or the trustee of a foreign trust for CGT purposes, just before the CGT event happens and the CGT event happens in relation to a CGT asset that is not 'taxable Australian property'.

The term 'taxable Australian property' is defined in the table in section 855-15 of the ITAA 1997. The table sets out these five categories of CGT assets: Item 1 taxable Australian real property; Item 2 an indirect Australian real property interest not covered by item 5; Item 3 a CGT asset used at any time in carrying on a business through a permanent establishment in Australia and which is not covered by item 1, 2 or 5; Item 4 an option or right to acquire a CGT asset covered by item 1, 2 or 3; and Item 5 a CGT asset that is covered by subsection 104-165(3) of the ITAA 1997 (choosing to disregard a gain or loss on ceasing to be an Australian resident).

ERC has advised that at the time CGT event G1 happens for any foreign resident ERC shareholder who is entitled to the proposed Final Capital Return, an ERC share will not be an indirect Australian real property interest (as defined in section 855-25 of the ITAA 1997) as the interest will not pass the principal asset test in section 855-30 of the ITAA 1997 at that time.

However, a foreign resident ERC shareholder, just before CGT event G1 happens, cannot disregard under subsection 855-10(1) of the ITAA 1997 a capital gain made if: (a) the ERC share has been used at any time by the foreign resident ERC shareholder in carrying on a business through a permanent establishment in Australia (item 3 of the table in section 855-15 of the ITAA 1997); or (b) the ERC share is covered by subsection 104-165(3) of the ITAA 1997 (item 5 of the table in section 855-15 of the ITAA 1997).

The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: Paragraph What this Ruling is about 1 Relevant provision(s) 2 Class of entities 3 Qualifications 4 Date of effect 8 Previous Rulings 9 Scheme 10 Ruling 23 Distribution is not a dividend for income tax purposes 23 The application of sections 45A, 45B and 45C to the proposed return of capital 24 Capital gains tax 25 Foreign resident shareholders 26 Appendix 1 - Explanation 28 Distribution is not a dividend 28 Anti-avoidance provisions 32 Sections 45A and 45B 32 Section 45A - streaming of dividends and capital benefits 33 Section 45B - schemes to provide capital benefits in substitution for dividends 36 Capital gains tax 43 CGT event G1 - section 104-135 43 Foreign resident shareholders 48 Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list 52