Issue
Will the journal entry made to the consolidated financial statements of Head Co for the purpose of recognising Head Co's on-market share buyback result in 'tainting' of the company's share capital account under Division 197 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?
Decision
No. A journal entry made in a consolidated group's financial statements is not a transfer into the share capital account of Head Co under subsection 197-5(1) of the ITAA 1997.
Facts
Head Co is the legal head entity of a consolidated group and head company of a tax consolidated group.
Head Co is an Australian resident for taxation purposes.
Head Co commenced an on-market share buyback of its shares.
The consolidated group expects to make the following journal entries due to the on market share buyback, in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards Board 3 'Business Combinations' (AASB 3):
The first journal entry is made in the general ledger of Head Co: Dr Share capital 25,000 Cr Cash 25,000 The second journal entry is made for the purposes of the consolidated financial statements of the consolidated group and does not appear in the general ledger of any entity within the consolidated group: Dr Retained Earnings 20,000 Cr Share Capital 20,000
Dr | Share capital | 25,000
Cr | Cash | 25,000
Dr | Retained Earnings | 20,000
Cr | Share Capital | 20,000
The result of both entries produces the following net outcome in the consolidated accounts: Dr Retained Earnings 20,000 Dr Share Capital 5,000 Cr Cash 25,000
Dr | Retained Earnings | 20,000
Dr | Share Capital | 5,000
Cr | Cash | 25,000
Reasons for Decision
The share capital tainting provisions in Division 197 of the ITAA 1997 provide for a franking debit to arise in a company's franking account and require distributions to be unfrankable when certain transfers are made to a company's share capital account.
The following extract from the Explanatory Memorandum (the EM) accompanying the Tax Laws Amendment (2006 Measures No. 3) Bill 2006 and New Business Tax System (Untainting Tax) Bill 2006 containing the share capital tainting provisions explains the purpose of those provisions: [1] The share capital tainting rules are integrity rules designed to prevent a company from disguising a distribution of profits as a tax-preferred capital distribution by transferring profits into its share capital account and subsequently making distributions from that account.
Division 197 of the ITAA 1997 applies to an amount that is transferred into the company's share capital account from another of the company's accounts, provided the company is an Australian resident before the time of transfer (subsection 197-5(1) of the ITAA 1997).
A company's share capital account will become tainted if such a transfer occurs, unless the account was already tainted (subsection 197-50(1) of the ITAA 1997).
Division 197 of the ITAA 1997 does not define when an amount is transferred from one account to another. However, the EM states that: 4.12 An amount is transferred from one account to another where that amount is moved from one account to another. This, in turn, requires the balance of the first account to be reduced, while the balance of the second account is increased by the same amount. 4.13 An amount is not transferred from one account to another where the particular accounting entries result in the balances of both accounts increasing in size. Accordingly, an accounting entry of the form 'debit asset, credit share capital account' does not represent a transfer in the relevant sense. Furthermore, a transfer to the share capital account will not arise if an expense account is debited at the same time that the share capital account is credited.
Division 197 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to taint the share capital account of Head Co because the first journal entry made does not constitute a transfer from another account into the share capital account of Head Co. Rather, it constitutes a reduction of the share capital account of Head Co.
Subsection 197-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 does not apply to the second journal entry that was made for consolidated accounting purposes in accordance with AASB 3 as it does not appear in the general ledger of Head Co. Accordingly, there is no tainting of Head Co's share capital account under subsection 197-5(1) of the ITAA 1997.
It is the entries a legal entity makes to its general ledger that will be determinative, and not the entries that are made to reflect a consolidated accounting position, as Division 197 of the ITAA 1997 is considered to operate on a legal entity basis.