Issue
Is the taxpayer entitled to a foreign income tax offset under subsection 770-10(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) in respect of a pension received from a New Zealand (NZ) National Provident Fund (the Fund)?
Decision
No. The taxpayer is not entitled to a foreign income tax offset under subsection 770-10(1) of the ITAA 1997 in relation to the pension received from the Fund because the taxpayer has not paid foreign income tax.
Facts
The taxpayer is an Australian resident for taxation purposes.
The taxpayer receives a pension from the Fund after 1 July 2008.
The pension received is non-assessable in NZ.
The Fund is taxed on its investment earnings in NZ.
The pension is assessable in Australia under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.
Reasons for Decision
Subsection 770-10(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a taxpayer is entitled to a foreign income tax offset for foreign income tax the taxpayer paid on an amount included in assessable income.
Subsection 770-15(1) of the ITAA 1997 defines 'foreign income tax' as tax imposed by a law other than an Australian law, and is: • tax on income; or • tax on profits or gains, whether of an income or capital nature; or • any other tax, being a tax that is subject to an agreement having the force of law under the International Tax Agreements Act 1953 (the Agreements Act).
Subsections 770-130(1) and 770-130(2) of the ITAA 1997 provide that a taxpayer is still treated as having paid foreign income tax where the foreign income tax is paid by someone else under an arrangement or under the law relating to the foreign income tax.
For these subsections to apply there must be a nexus between the payment of the foreign income tax and the tax liability of the taxpayer.
In this case, the Fund is liable to tax in its own right. As the foreign income tax paid by the Fund does not relate to a tax liability of the taxpayer, the taxpayer is not entitled to a foreign income tax offset under subsection 770-10(1) of the ITAA 1997.
Paragraph 1.105 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 4) Act 2007 , which introduced the foreign income tax offset rules, states: A taxpayer in receipt of a foreign pension from a foreign superannuation fund will also not satisfy the nexus in respect of any foreign income tax paid by the foreign superannuation fund on its income.
In determining liability to Australian tax on foreign sourced income received by a resident, it is necessary to consider not only the income tax laws but also any applicable double tax agreement contained in the Agreements Act.
Section 4 of the Agreements Act incorporates that Act with the ITAA 1997 so that the ITAA 1997 is read as one with the Agreements Act. Schedule 4 to the Agreements Act contains the double tax agreement between Australia and NZ (the NZ Convention).
Article 23(1) of the NZ Convention provides that, subject to the provisions of the law of Australia, a credit for any tax paid in NZ under NZ law and in accordance with the NZ Agreement will be allowed against Australian tax payable on income from NZ sources. No NZ tax has been paid by the taxpayer under the law of NZ.
Article 18(1) of the NZ Convention provides that pensions paid to a resident of Australia shall be taxable only in Australia. The fact that the Fund is liable to tax in NZ on its income does not affect the application of Article 18(1). Hence, the pension received by the taxpayer from the Fund is taxable only in Australia. Even if it were recognised that the taxpayer had paid tax in NZ in respect of the pension received, such tax would not have been paid in accordance with the NZ Convention.
Therefore, Article 23(1) of the NZ Convention does not apply to oblige Australia to provide credit relief in respect of the pension received by the taxpayer. Note: as the taxpayer has not paid any foreign tax, they are not required to include in their assessable income the tax paid by the Fund. That is, the taxpayer is not required to gross-up the pension received by the amount of the tax paid by the Fund.