Issue
Is unclaimed money held by the entity, a retailer in Victoria, for a customer in relation to a cancelled lay-by sale and to be paid to the Registrar, as required by the Unclaimed Moneys Act 1962 (Vic) if it remains unclaimed, treated as consideration for a supply made by the entity under section 102-5 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act)?
Decision
No, the unclaimed money is not treated as consideration for a supply made by the entity under section 102-5 of the GST Act.
Facts
The entity is a retailer located in Victoria and is registered for goods and services tax (GST). The entity enters into a lay-by agreement with a customer to sell goods. The customer makes an initial payment then fails to make any other payments on the lay-by. The entity cancels the agreement and holds the initial payment for the customer to collect.
For purposes of the Unclaimed Moneys Act: • the amount held by the entity will be 'unclaimed moneys' if it remains unclaimed by the customer for 12 months or more • businesses are required to pay 'unclaimed moneys' to the Registrar, for payment into the consolidated fund, on or before 31 March each year (or a later date approved in writing by the Registrar in any particular case), and • businesses are required to keep records and, in certain circumstances, advertise details of unclaimed moneys.
The entity continues to hold the initial payment for the customer's collection until the Unclaimed Moneys Act requires the entity to pay it to the Registrar.
Reasons for Decision
Section 102-5 of the GST Act provides, amongst other things, that if a supply by way of lay-by sale is cancelled, any amount retained or recovered by the supplier because of the cancellation is treated as consideration for a supply made by the supplier.
Although the entity has the customer's initial payment, the entity is holding this money for the customer to collect. If it remains unclaimed for 12 months or more it becomes 'unclaimed moneys' under the Unclaimed Moneys Act and the entity will be required to forward the money to the Registrar. The entity does not have any right to take the money into its revenue and use it for its own purposes. The entity is merely holding the money on trust for the customer. The entity does not retain the money for the purposes of section 102-5 of the GST Act. This means the money is not treated as consideration for a supply. Note: if the lay-by agreement provides that the entity may take money into its revenue from payments made by the customer, say 10% of the price of the sale, this amount would be an amount retained by the entity and treated under section 102-5 of the GST Act as consideration for a supply made by the entity.