Excise: the meaning of the expression 'manufactured or produced' for the purposes of the Excise Acts

This Ruling provides the Commissioner's view regarding the meaning of the expression 'manufactured or produced' for the purposes of the excise regime.

The Commissioner has the general administration of the excise regime with its framework principally provided by the Excise Act 1901 (Excise Act) and the Excise Tariff Act 1921 (Excise Tariff Act). [1]

Section 2 of the Excise Tariff Act provides that the Excise Act, Excise Tariff Act and Petroleum Excise (Prices) Act 1987 [2] are to be read as one.

The Excise Act deals with matters such as general administration, licensing, control of excisable goods, the payment of excise duty and the remission, refund and drawback of excise duty.

Excisable goods are defined in section 4 of the Excise Act to mean goods in respect of which excise duty is imposed by the Parliament, and includes goods the subject of an Excise Tariff or Excise Tariff alteration proposed in the Parliament.

To manufacture excisable goods, you are required to be a licensed manufacturer. [3] A licensed manufacturer can only manufacture excisable goods at licensed premises in accordance with the conditions specified in the manufacturer licence. [4]

Licence holders are responsible for the safe custody of all excisable goods held on their premises and for the observance of the Excise Act at the premises specified in their licence. [5]

The Excise Tariff Act deals with the imposition of excise duty and matters relating to duties of excise.

Section 5 of the Excise Tariff Act imposes excise duty on goods dutiable under the Schedule that are 'manufactured or produced' in Australia. The Schedule lists the various goods that are subject to excise duty and the rate of duty applicable.

'Australia' is defined in sections 4 and 4A of the Excise Act to exclude certain external territories, but include certain installations (a resources installation or sea installation) which are deemed to be part of Australia.

The relevant definition of Australia for excise purposes is the definition in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Acts Interpretation Act) [6] as modified by the Excise Act. For the purposes of the excise regime, the term 'Australia' does not include any external Territory [7] but includes certain installations (a resources installation or sea installation - for example, an oil rig) which are treated as being part of Australia under section 4A of the Excise Act.

In this Ruling, unless otherwise stated: • a reference to: - 'Customs Tariff Act' is a reference to the Customs Tariff Act 1995; - 'Excise Acts' is a reference to the Excise Act 1901 and Excise Tariff Act 1921; - 'Fuel Tax Act' is a reference to the Fuel Tax Act 2006; - 'manufacture or produce' is also a reference to 'manufactured or produced'; - 'the Schedule' is a reference to the Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act; • 'article', 'good' or 'thing' are used interchangeably; and • 'process' is to be read in context to cover processes.

This Ruling applies to the class of entities that have obligations under the Excise Acts for goods that are 'manufactured or produced in Australia'.

You have a liability to pay excise duty in accordance with the Excise Acts [8] if you manufacture or produce excisable goods in Australia.

The phrase 'manufactured or produced' for the purposes of the Excise Acts, requires that something new or different, having a distinctive [9] character or use, results from a process[0]. It is the end result that is determinative; however the complexity of the process may still be relevant.

It is a question of fact and degree in relation to which an exercise in judgement is involved as to whether the end product constitutes a new or different thing from that out of which it was made or results. This involves a process of evaluating and weighing a range of factors for the particular circumstance. In particular circumstances the difference in character may be slight or it may be great.

The thing did not previously exist. The parts have been combined to form a thing that is distinct (for example, commercially distinct) from that out of which it is made having a distinctive character or use.

Whether something is new or different does not depend upon whether the original parts remain identifiable at the end of the process. Whether the physical identity of the parts is retained or lost by fusion or some process is not determinative.

The thing that is brought into existence has new or different qualities, properties or combinations thereof from that out of which it is made or derived. It may be any quality that indicates a difference - qualities such as colour, shape, or chemical composition. For example, a change in chemical composition by adding, removing, combining or altering the chemical characteristic of the thing being manufactured or produced.

A change in form (for example, change from solid to liquid, or liquid to gas) does not automatically mean that manufacturing or production has occurred. Where a change in form has occurred you will still need to consider whether something new or different has resulted from this change - for example it has new qualities, properties or combinations thereof.

The existence of something new or different may depend on or result from not only a change in its chemical or physical characteristics but also upon a change in its utility, for example creating a saleable commodity if the commodity is new or different having a distinctive character or use. [9A]

Improvements to goods in existence may result in something new or different where the improvements give the goods new or different qualities, properties, utility or combinations thereof.

Whether or not an entity has intended for the thing to be manufactured or produced, or whether the thing has come into existence incidentally as a consequence of some process, is relevant but not determinative of whether something has been manufactured or produced. [10]

A good that comes into existence incidentally from a process and is of a relatively lower quality or value from the main goods made from the process may still be considered manufactured or produced. [11]

Goods that are brought into existence for the consumption of the manufacturer or producer and not a third party consumer, may still be considered manufactured or produced.

Manufacture or production may involve the application of skill, knowledge or labour to a thing that brings into existence something new or different having a distinctive character or use.

Dandy Tobacco Company (DT) purchases duty paid cut tobacco. [12] DT specialises in producing middle-eastern styled tobacco that is smoked through water pipes or hookahs. DT adds molasses and other ingredients to the tobacco to produce molasses tobacco in Australia.

Item 5 of the Schedule refers to tobacco, cigars, cigarettes and snuff. The term 'tobacco' is defined in the preamble to the Schedule and means tobacco leaf subjected to any process other than curing the leaf as stripped from the plant. Where cut tobacco is subject to further processing to produce another tobacco product, that end product also meets the definition of tobacco. The process also requires the application of skill and knowledge.

The addition of molasses to cut tobacco amounts to the manufacture or production of tobacco. The process results in a product that is different and has a distinctive character from that out of which it is made.

Consequently, the molasses tobacco is an excisable good.

Levy Company (Levy) wants to reduce the alcoholic content of wine, a sauvignon blanc, by subjecting it to the process of evaporative perstraction.

Levy first puts the sauvignon blanc through a reverse osmosis process that separates the wine into a wine permeate and a wine retentate. The wine permeate then moves onto a membrane, which comprises very small pores and has two surfaces. Water runs along the outside surface of the membrane. Alcohol from the wine permeate evaporates at the pores of the surface of the membrane and passes through the membrane. On exit from the pores of the membrane, the alcohol condenses and dissolves, or mixes, into the water running along the outside surface of the membrane.

At the conclusion of the process, Levy has two products. One is reduced alcohol sauvignon blanc, and the other is alcoholised water with an alcoholic content of 9% alcohol by volume (a/v).

The processes undertaken by Levy to reduce the alcoholic content of wine described result in changes to the sauvignon blanc resulting in products (reduced alcohol sauvignon blanc and alcoholised water) that are different from the product out of which they were made. The reduced alcohol sauvignon blanc and alcoholised water are manufactured or produced.

The alcoholised water is classifiable to item 2 of the Schedule (other excisable beverages [13] not exceeding 10% by volume of alcohol). However, reduced alcohol sauvignon blanc is not classifiable to the Schedule. [14]

Hatton Company (Hatton) is a spirits bottler. Hatton acquires an iso-tanker of whisky at 67% a/v. Hatton pumps the whisky into its storage tank. In preparation for bottling, Hatton reduces the alcoholic strength from 67% to 40% a/v by the addition of water. The whisky is then bottled into one litre bottles.

The reduction of the high strength whisky results in physical and chemical changes (such as taste, strength and density) to the whisky. The whisky at 40% a/v has a different character from the whisky at 67% a/v. The process of reduction results in a product that is different from that out of which it is made.

The reduction of high strength whisky by the addition of water constitutes manufacture or production of whisky for excise purposes.

Waymouth Oil Company (WO) imports mineral turpentine on which customs duty is paid. The overseas packaging is in 200 litre containers. WO repackages the mineral turpentine into smaller 1 litre containers in Australia to meet the requirements of the retail market.

Mineral turpentine is dutiable under subitem 10.26 of the Schedule. The mineral turpentine has not been subject to any other process in Australia aside from being repackaged. It is the same product both before and after its repackaging. The repackaging of the imported mineral turpentine is not manufacture or production for excise purposes.

Consequently, the repackaged mineral turpentine is not an excisable good.

'Manufactured or produced' for the purposes of the Excise Acts means the manufacture or production of goods specified in the Schedule - having regard to the specific provisions of the Excise Act that modify the meaning of 'manufacture' or 'produce'.

Section 68 of the Excise Act provides that no person shall be deemed to manufacture because he or she cures tobacco leaf. Although the process of curing would ordinarily be seen to be manufacture, a person is deemed not to manufacture merely because he or she cures tobacco leaf. 'Tobacco' is defined in the preamble to the Schedule to mean 'tobacco leaf subjected to any process other than curing the leaf as stripped from the plant'.

The repackaging of beer is taken to be the manufacture of beer for the purposes of the Excise Acts [14A] if beer that has already been entered for home consumption under subitems 1.2, 1.6 or 1.11 of the Schedule [15] is then repackaged into sealed individual containers that are: • less than 8 litres; or • at least 8 litres but not exceeding 48 litres, where the container is not designed to connect to a pressurised gas or pump delivery system or other prescribed system.

An exemption to this applies to the first 10,000 litres of beer that is repackaged at particular premises in a financial year provided: • the beer is repackaged into exempt beer containers for the purposes of retail sale; and • the retail sale occurs immediately after the repackaging of the beer.

An exempt beer container is a sealed individual container, of no more than 2 litres, that is not pressurised.

For businesses who repackage beer at more than one premises, each premises is subject to its own 10,000 litre threshold.

Setzer Company purchases 50 litre kegs of beer on which excise duty has been paid and then repackages the beer into 5 litre party kegs for retail sale.

The repackaging of beer, on which excise duty has been paid, from 50 litre kegs into 5 litre kegs, is taken to be manufacture for excise purposes as a 5 litre keg is not an exempt beer container.

Harry's Hotel refills 2 litre containers ('growlers') for their customers. They fill these smaller containers directly from 30 litre, duty-paid kegs, using the draught beer system at their bar.

During the course of the financial year, Harry's Hotel refills 3,500 growlers for their retail customers at their hotel premises thereby repackaging 7,000 litres of beer.

As the beer is being repackaged into containers of 2 litres or less that are not pressurised, the refilling occurs immediately before the retail sale to the customer and Harry's Hotel has not repackaged more than 10,000 litres during the financial year at its hotel premises, the refilling of the growlers is not taken to be manufacture for excise purposes.

George's Craft Brewery manufactures beer which is pumped into 50 litre kegs, and pays excise duty when the kegs are moved from their licensed premises into a separate warehouse.

Once a month they repackage the beer into smaller containers at their warehouse and then offer them for sale to customers at their Brewery.

Although George's Craft Brewery repackage the beer into exempt beer containers, the repackaging has not occurred immediately prior to retail sale. Given this, the repackaging is taken to be manufacture for excise purposes.

The process of compressing natural gas to form compressed natural gas constitutes the manufacture or production of the compressed natural gas. [17] When natural gas is compressed, it has new qualities/properties that are different from natural gas.

However, compressed natural gas is exempt from excise duty if it: • was compressed for use other than as a fuel for a motor vehicle (that is, non-transport use); or • was compressed other than in the course of carrying on an enterprise; or • was compressed for use as fuel in: - a motor vehicle that is designed: • merely to move goods with a forklift; and • for use primarily off public roads; or - motor vehicles of a kind prescribed by the regulations. [18]

Compressed natural gas is also exempt from excise duty if it: • was compressed at residential premises; and • the rate at which it can be compressed is not more than - the amount per hour prescribed by the regulations; or - if no amount is prescribed - 10 kilograms of compressed natural gas per hour; and • the compressed natural gas is not sold or otherwise supplied in the course of carrying on an enterprise. [19]

Liquefied petroleum gas is manufactured or produced when hydrocarbon gases undergo processes that compress them to a liquid state. Liquefied petroleum gas has new qualities/properties that are different from hydrocarbon gas. [20]

Similarly, the cooling of natural gas to form liquefied natural gas constitutes the manufacture or production of liquefied natural gas. [21] When natural gas is liquefied, it has new qualities/properties that are very different from natural gas.

However, liquefied petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas are exempt from excise duty if: • the liquefied petroleum gas or liquefied natural gas is used by a licensed manufacturer on premises specified in the manufacturer licence; and • the use is in the process of manufacturing petroleum condensate or stabilised crude petroleum oil or liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas or other hydrocarbons; and • the petroleum condensate or stabilised crude petroleum or liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas or other hydrocarbons is manufactured in accordance with the licence. [22]

Blending constitutes manufacture or production for excise purposes where same, similar or dissimilar goods are blended resulting in a new or different product having a distinctive character or use, having regard to specific provisions that deal with blending - sections 77FM, 77G and 77H of the Excise Act.

Subsection 77FM(1) and subsection 77G(1) of the Excise Act specifically provide that spirit and fuel blending respectively constitute manufacture. In this context, it is not necessary to consider whether a new or different product has resulted from the blending.

However, spirit blending is taken not to constitute manufacture if it occurred in circumstances as specified in a legislative instrument. [23]

In relation to fuel blending, blending exemptions under subsections 77H(1), 77H(2A) and 77H(2B) of the Excise Act apply to the blending of certain goods. Under these exemptions, the blending of 1 or more eligible goods [24] or relevant fuel [25] is taken not to result in goods covered by paragraph 10(g) of the Schedule if certain requirements are met. [26]

The exemption under subsection 77H(1) of the Excise Act does not apply where any of the eligible goods or other substances on which excise or customs duty has been paid, are certain goods specified under subsection 77H(2) of the Excise Act. [27] The blended goods are also taken not to be goods covered by paragraph 10(g) of the Schedule if they meet the circumstances specified in a legislative instrument. [28]

Perth Distillery Company (PD) is located in Australia and manufactures or produces spirit. This spirit is then stored at a distillery in Perth (local ethanol).The local ethanol is used as high strength spirit for human consumption. PD also imports spirit (imported spirit) for use as feedstock to make domestic high strength spirit. The local and imported spirit are blended and stored in the same tank at the distillery.

Item 3 of the Schedule refers to spirits; other excisable beverages exceeding 10% by volume of alcohol. High strength spirit for human consumption manufactured or produced in Australia falls within this item.

The blending of imported and local ethanol by PD is manufacture or production for excise purposes. [29]

The blended high strength spirit manufactured or produced by PD is an excisable good.

Carlene Company (Carlene) is a fuel distributor. Carlene produces a blend of diesel and kerosene (known as 'winter mix') formulated for use in internal combustion engines in cold weather.

Carlene uses only duty paid diesel and duty paid kerosene in the blend. The blending of the fuel is not manufacture of taxable fuel as the blend is excluded from excise manufacture by section 77H of the Excise Act as duty has been paid at the same rate on the diesel and kerosene.

The blending of duty paid diesel and duty paid kerosene is not manufacture or production of fuel for excise purposes.

The processes referred to in paragraph 10(d) of the Schedule (that is, recycling, manufacturing or other process) constitute manufacture or production where the processes result in something new or different having a distinctive character or use.

Recycling constitutes manufacture or production for excise purposes where the recycling process results in something new or different having a distinctive character or use, having regard to specific recycling provisions under section 77J of the Excise Act and items 10 and 15 of the Schedule.

Section 77J of the Excise Act specifically excludes certain goods that are for use as a solvent which are manufactured or produced by a recycling process from subitems 10.25, 10.26, 10.27, 10.28 or 10.30 of the Schedule. This section ensures that the recycler would not be required to pay excise duty on such recycled solvents.

It is a question of fact and degree in relation to which an exercise in judgement is involved whether a recycling process (for example, de-mineralisation, screening, separation of contaminants by settlement, centrifuge or refining) results in something that is new or different having a distinctive character or use.

The Commissioner considers that a recycling process which consists only of filtering and de-watering used oil would not, by itself, result in something that is new or different having a distinctive character or use. Rather, in keeping with the findings of Deputy President Alpins in Cooper Bros , [29A] such a process would result in an end product which is 'not relevantly different from the used oil in either its physical characteristics or in its utility'. [29B]

The Commissioner considers that the term 'recycling' does not include the reuse of used oil where nothing new or different having a distinctive character or use has been manufactured or produced.

Joe is a waste oil collector and recycler. He provides a 1,500 litre tank to clients for the collection and accumulation of waste oil of varying type and quality.

To prevent physical contaminants (such as nuts, bolts and rags) from entering the collection tank, the tank has a coarse filter at the inlet. The purpose of this filter is to protect pumping equipment from damage when transferring the waste oil from the tank to the road tanker.

As a result of the waste oil's storage, some water (free water) in the waste oil separates and settles to the bottom of the storage tank.

The collection tank is pumped of oil on a regular basis. Joe pumps the free water from the bottom of the tank into a compartment of his road tanker by the use of a flexible spear. Once the transfer of free water is complete, the waste oil is then transferred to a separate compartment on the road tanker.

The waste oil is transported by Joe directly to a customer for use as burner oil.

Joe has not produced or manufactured a liquid hydrocarbon product derived from the recycling of oil. [30] The coarse filtering or the separation of water by settling is part of the collection process of the waste oil and only results in the product achieving the state it was in at the time it became waste oil. The process does not result in something new or different having a distinctive character or use from the waste oil as collected.

Di Waste Oils Pty Ltd (Di) is a waste management company that collects various used oils, coolants (glycol and water) and other hazardous liquids.

These waste liquids are collected from several sites in a single journey. During collection, the waste liquids are pumped into a tanker through a metal screen. By detecting audible changes in pump speed caused by variations in the viscosity of liquid passing through it, the tanker operator switches from one segregated part of the tanker to another to separate the fluids according to the relative viscosity. This is done in order to optimise the separation of less viscous fluids which will be directly disposed of by Di as hazardous waste, from other higher viscosity hydrocarbon liquids.

At Di's depot, the tanker's compartments containing the less viscous liquids are disposed of as hazardous waste. The higher viscosity liquids (comprising primarily used oils and hydraulic fluids) are pumped through a filter bag into a large fixed waste oil storage tank. The filter bag removes small particles of wear metal and other solid or semi-solid contaminants.

The oil in the waste oil tank is then pumped through a heat exchange where it is heated to a suitable temperature (to reduce the viscosity of the oil which assists with separation) and passed through a centrifuge to remove any remaining solids and water suspended within the oil. The oil is then tested to ensure, among other things, that the oil is compliant with local council and State environmental legislation and that it meets customer specifications. The oil is then sold as 'low grade burner fuel'.

The low grade burner fuel is not a new and different product with a distinctive character or use. The burner fuel 'merely contains less water and other extrinsic impurities than the used oil'. [30A] The burner fuel does not inherently have a different utility to that out of which it was made, [30B] and is 'merely better able to be used for the same purpose'. [30C]

Di has not manufactured or produced a product for excise purposes.

This example can be contrasted with example 10 below in which used oil is subjected to an additional step of 'demineralisation'. This additional step results in the removal of impurities that are more intrinsic in nature (than the water and other extrinsic impurities removed by filtering and de-watering alone).

Eric is an oil recycler. Eric collects used oil of varying type and quality from multiple sources. Upon arrival at his depot, Eric drains any free water from the road tanker and then pumps the used oil through a screen into a reaction tank.

In order to reduce the ash content of the oil when combusted, Eric needs to remove intrinsically dissolved mineral contaminants produced from the breakdown of mineral enhancers and lubricants, both added to the oil by manufacturers and accumulated from fuel engine deposits.

To do so Eric adds a quantity of sulphuric acid followed by an inter-facial surface active agent (surfactant) to the reaction tank and the mixture is stirred and heated to 60°C for two hours. The mixture is then allowed to stand so that it can separate into two layers or 'phases' - that is, an oil phase and water-based or 'aqueous' phase. The surfactant facilitates both the reaction of the sulfuric acid with mineral contaminants dissolved within the oil and the separation of the two phases. Excess acid, water and the reacted contaminants in the oil accumulate in the aqueous phase, which settles to the bottom of the reaction tank and is drained off as slurry.

The oil then undergoes centrifugal separation to remove any remaining fine particles suspended in the oil. Eric samples and tests the oil to ensure the oil meets his customer's specifications for high grade industrial burner oil.

A chemical transformation is required for the removal of mineral contaminants intrinsically dissolved in the used oil. This will also result in the modification of some of the used oil's physicochemical properties. This procedure involves more than the 'mere removal of water and other extrinsic materials' that may be achieved by filtering and de-watering alone.

The process undertaken by Eric results in a 'recycled oil' that is new or different with a distinctive character from the used oil as collected. The high grade industrial burner oil [30D] is manufactured or produced for excise purposes.

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

[Withdrawn.]

This Ruling applies both before and after its date of issue. However, the following paragraphs explain our view of the law as it applies as follows: Provision application dates • Section 77FC of the Excise Act: - changes to the repackaging provisions for beer apply from 1 July 2023. See Treasury Laws Amendment (Refining and Improving Our Tax System) Act 2023. See paragraph 44 of this Ruling. • Subsection 77H(5) of the Excise Act: - changes to the definition of eligible goods apply on and from 1 December 2011. See Taxation of Alternative Fuels Legislation Amendment Act 2011. See paragraph 56 of this Ruling. - changes to insert the meaning of relevant fuel apply if the blending occurs on or after 1 July 2012 (whether the amounts of relevant fuel being blended were manufactured, produced, or imported before, on or after that day). See Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No. 3) Act 2012. See paragraph 56 of this Ruling. • Subsections 77H(2A) and 77H(2B) of the Excise Act: - apply if the blending occurs on or after 1 July 2012 (whether the amounts of relevant fuel being blended were manufactured, produced, or imported before, on or after that day). See paragraphs 56 and 129A of this Ruling. • Subsection 77HA(1) of the Excise Act: - applies on and from 1 July 2012. See paragraphs 48 and 117 of this Ruling. • Subsection 77HA(2) of the Excise Act: - applies on and from 1 July 2012. See paragraphs 49 and 118 of this Ruling. • Subsection 77HB of the Excise Act: - applies on and from 1 December 2011. For transitional and application provisions see Taxation of Alternative Fuels Legislation Amendment Act 2011. See paragraphs 52 and 119 to 122 of this Ruling. • Paragraphs 10(da), 10(db) and 10(dc) of the Schedule: - apply on and from 1 December 2011. For transitional and application provisions see Excise Tariff Amendment (Taxation of Alternative Fuels) Act 2011. See paragraph 56 of this Ruling. • Paragraphs 10(i) and 10(j) of the Schedule: - changes apply on and from 1 December 2011. For application provisions see Excise Tariff Amendment (Taxation of Alternative Fuels) Act 2011. See paragraph 126 of this Ruling.

However, the Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Ruling (see paragraphs 75 to 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).

The term 'manufacture' is defined in section 4 of the Excise Act as: Manufacture includes all processes in the manufacture of excisable goods and, in relation to beer, includes the provision to the public at particular premises of commercial facilities and equipment for use in the production of beer at those premises.

The excise definition of 'manufacture' includes all processes (that is, the series of stages or actions) in the manufacture of excisable goods. The reference to 'processes' indicates the provision has wide application; that is not confined to a particular operation or course of action.

In Cooper Bros , [30E] Deputy President Alpins said of this definition, and its interaction with the reference to 'manufactured' in section 5 of the Excise Tariff Act: The inclusive definition of the word 'manufacture' in s 4 of the Excise Act extends the meaning of the word beyond its ordinary meaning ... [O]nly licensed manufacturers may manufacture excisable goods, and they must do so in accordance with the Act and the licence. In my view, the definition of the word 'manufacture' serves to extend the application of those requirements to those who undertake processes in the manufacture of excisable goods. Furthermore, it thus extends liability to pay excise duty... Nevertheless, the question posed by s 5(1) of the Tariff Act is whether the goods in question have been 'manufactured' ... As is evident from the reasoning of Sundberg J in Caltex , that question is to be answered according to the ordinary meaning [of that word].

'Produce' is not defined in the Excise Act or the Excise Tariff Act. [34] The term should be given its ordinary meaning in the context in which the term is used.

In the context of the sales tax legislation, Lockhart J held in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Jax Tyres Pty Ltd [35] (Jax Tyres) that to manufacture an article necessarily involves producing a different article from the articles, materials or ingredients from which it was made. Further, Lockhart J referred to the case of McNicol v. Pinch, [36] in which Darling J held the essence of making or of manufacturing is that what is made shall be a different thing from that out of which it is made. That passage was approved and applied by Dixon J in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Jack Zinader Pty Ltd [37] where it was held that whether an article which results from the process, is a different article from the constituents or ingredients from which it was made, is a question of fact.

The cases referred to in paragraph 93 of this Ruling were adopted by Sundberg J in Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation [38] (Caltex) in considering the meaning of manufactured or produced in an excise context.

In Caltex, Sundberg J, in relying on Jax Tyres , [39] held that for the purposes of section 5 of the Excise Tariff Act, goods are manufactured or produced if they have emerged from a process as a 'new and different article ... having a distinctive character or use'. [40] The ordinary meaning of 'distinctive' means 'distinguishing; serving to distinguish' and the ordinary meaning of 'distinguish' means 'different'. [41] In particular circumstances the difference in character may be slight or it may be great.

In Caltex, Sundberg J held that excise duty is imposed on goods by reference to their quality as manufactured goods and not with any reference to the relative value of the goods or the subjective intentions of the manufacturer. Further, Sundberg J explained that the principal objectives of a commercial operation may be relevant to the question of characterisation as they provide context for the task of characterisation and are an important factor to take into account. However, they are not determinative in ascertaining whether a good is manufactured or produced. [42]

The Commissioner considers that, in addition to Sundberg J's observations in Caltex, the following cases set out factors that may be relevant in determining whether something new or different has been manufactured or produced for excise purposes. [43] Whilst it is not possible to directly adopt judicial interpretation of the words manufacture or produce as it appears in other legislation or jurisdictions, in the absence of any other direct authority these cases provide relevant guidance.

In Commissioner of Taxation v. Softex Industries Pty Ltd [44] (Softex) , the Full Federal Court (Ryan and Hely JJ with Dowsett J agreeing) held in a sales tax context that: We agree with the primary judge that whether a particular factual situation comes within par (b) of the definition does not depend upon whether the original parts remain identifiable at the end of the process, but on whether the parts have been combined so as to form an article that did not previously exist, which is commercially distinct from the original parts. For the purpose of determining whether there has been a 'combining' of components, it is not critical whether the physical identity of the parts or ingredients is retained, or lost by fusion or some other process. ... In coming to a different conclusion in this respect [the] AAT misdirected itself as to the scope of par (b) of the definition and thereby fell into legal error. [45]

Whether there is a new or different thing does not depend upon whether the original parts remain identifiable at the end of the process. It is relevant if the parts have been combined to form a new or different thing that is distinct (for example, commercially distinct) from that out of which it is made (that is, having a distinctive character or use).

The factors to be taken into consideration in determining whether something is different from that out of which it was made were discussed in an income tax context by Windeyer J in M.P. Metals Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation [46] (M.P. Metals): It is no doubt true that all manufacturing involves the making of a new thing. But it is not true that every making of a new thing is, in the relevant sense, manufacturing. And what is meant by a new thing? In Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Jack Zinader Pty. Ltd. (1949) 78 CLR 336, at p.343 (a case under the Sales Tax Acts) Dixon J. quoted a statement by Darling J. in McNicol v. Pinch [ 1906] 2 K.B. 352, at p. 361 that 'the essence of making or manufacturing is that what is made shall be a different thing from that out of which it is made'. That is indisputable. But what is a different thing? Various paraphrases were offered to me, such as 'substantially different thing', not merely an 'altered thing'; 'a new entity'; 'a distinct commodity'. But these are all pregnant with ambiguity. Identity and difference, as concepts, must always be related to some quality of the thing or things in respect of which identity or difference is to be determined. It may be colour, shape, chemical composition or any other quality. To speak of 'substantial differences', as distinct from small differences, means little or nothing, unless some quality of the thing is postulated as its essential.

In the Irish case Samuel McCausland v. Ministry of Commerce (McCausland) [47] regarding the manufacture of goods for eligibility of a grant under the Re-equipment of Industry Act (Northern Ireland) 1951, the Court considered amongst other things, the issue of utility, quality and worth of bulk product (seeds) that have been processed. [48] Lord MacDermott LCJ observed that although each seed in the bulk that had been processed did not change physically, when considered in bulk, from a physical and commercial perspective, there was clearly a significant change: ...the production of a commodity different from the crop not only in content but in quality, and so different as to enter a marketable category which, by its usability for seeding purposes, is quite distinct from that of the crop. ...The circumstance that each seed in the bulk produced by the company may have passed through all the processed without appreciable physical change does not appear to me to justify a different conclusion once it has been held that the goods in question are the seed in bulk. That accepted, the change accomplished is physically appreciable and commercially vital.... In short, the bulk with which we are now dealing is much more than an aggregation of individual seeds; it has a utility, a quality and a worth which are due to and cannot be dissociated from the processes carried out in the company's premises. One cannot, as it seems to me, decide this case merely by looking at the goods and giving them a physical description. One must also consider how they came to be what they are and what the company has done to the crop in order to obtain the finished product.

Porter LJ in McCausland [49] was of the opinion that the production of rye grass seeds from mixed seeds with other foreign matter processed into a homogeneous, marketable and repackaged commodity is a manufacture of goods within the meaning of the legislation considered in that case: The processing and machining have changed what was a mass of heterogeneous seeds and other foreign substances into a homogeneous, marketable commodity, smaller in bulk but cleaned, sorted, graded, bagged and adapted for sale as 'ryegrass seed' in accordance with the Ryegrass Seed (Temporary Provisions) Act (Northern Ireland), 1949, and the Ryegrass Seed (Temporary Provisions) (Extension) Act (Northern Ireland), 1950, and the Regulations made thereunder. In my opinion the production of ryegrass seed in this manner by the company is a manufacture of goods within the meaning of section 13.

However, these factors are not looked at in isolation when determining if something new or different has been manufactured or produced for excise purposes.

The Commissioner considers that the mere re-use of used oil for different purposes does not constitute the manufacture or production of goods from used oil. [50] Although there may be a change in use, there is no manufacture or production of something new or different for excise purposes in those circumstances.

In the context of the Canadian excise system (dealing with a consumption or sales tax) Pratte, J.A. in Minister of National Revenue v. Enseignes Imperial Signs Ltd, [51] concluded that: ...a thing can be produced by carrying out a very simple operation. What matters is not the complexity of the operation but its result. A thing is produced if what a person does has the result of producing something new; and a thing is new when it can perform a function that could not be performed by the things which existed previously. [52]

The complexity of a process, on its own, may not be a determinative factor of whether something is manufactured or produced. However, it will be relevant where it results in processes which change a good into something new or different having a distinctive character or use.

In Re Searls Ltd [53] (Re Searls) Harvey CJ discussed in the context of sales tax the notion that manufacture involves the application of skill to the component elements of a thing in order to bring a new and saleable entity into existence, stating: In my opinion the fact that a new saleable entity is brought into existence by means of skill applied to the component elements of that new entity goes a long way to establish that the result is a manufactured article and if to that new entity people would in every day language apply the words 'made' or 'manufactured' and that entity is purchased for its own sake by reason of the skill which has been exhibited in putting the component parts into combination, I think it is proper to call the completed article a manufactured article.

In Jax Tyres [54] Lockhart J conveyed that manufacture connotes labour - however, that labour does not have to be of a particular scale for a process to be considered manufacture or production: The primary meaning of the word 'manufacture' when used as a verb is to make something by hand; but since the industrial revolution the word has come to mean manufacture by machinery, often on a large scale and with a division of labour. This accords with the dictionary definition. As Windeyer J said in Readymixed Concrete (WA) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1971) 71 ATC 4107 at p 4109: All that can perhaps be said of the word manufacture is that its derivative and etymological sense no longer determines its meaning. No longer is it restricted to the handiwork of individual craftsmen.'

Implicit in the ordinary meaning of manufacture or produce and in the discussion of cases such as Re Searls [55] and Jax Tyres [56] is the notion that knowledge, skills and labour may be features of manufacture or production.

The following provisions modify, clarify or operate in relation to the meaning of 'manufactured or produced', or affect the imposition of excise duty: • Section 68 of the Excise Act - Exemption for the curing of tobacco; • Section 77FC of the Excise Act - Repackaged beer; • Section 77HA of the Excise Act - Compressed natural gas that is exempt from excise duty; • Section 77HB of the Excise Act - Liquefied petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas that is exempt from excise duty; • Section 77FM of the Excise Act - Spirit blending is to be treated as manufacture; • Section 77G of the Excise Act - Fuel blending is to be treated as manufacture; • Section 77H of the Excise Act - Blending exemptions; • Section 77J of the Excise Act - Recycling of solvents; • Item 10 of the Schedule - Liquid hydrocarbon products derived through a recycling, manufacturing or other process; and • Items 10 and 15 of the Schedule - the reference to 'recycling' or 'recycled'.

The Schedule provides that: tobacco means tobacco leaf subjected to any process other than curing the leaf as stripped from the plant.

Section 68 of the Excise Act provides that: No person shall be deemed to manufacture merely because he or she cures tobacco leaf as stripped from the plant so as to convert it into leaf tobacco.

Section 68 of the Excise Act and the meaning of tobacco in the Schedule ensure that curing of tobacco leaf [57] is excluded from the meaning of 'manufacture' for the purposes of the Excise Acts. Curing is the controlled drying (that is, through regulated conditions of temperature and humidity) of tobacco leaves to enhance the tobacco's texture, colour and aroma. The basic purpose of curing is to produce a stable product of suitable physical and chemical composition for use in cigarette manufacture. [58] As the tobacco has undergone a physical and chemical change, the process of curing would otherwise be 'manufacture' in the ordinary sense of the word.

Section 77FC of the Excise Act states: 77FC Repackaged beer (1) If: (a) beer classified to subitem 1.2, 1.6 or 1.11 of the Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act 1921 is entered for home consumption; and (b) the beer is repackaged into sealed individual containers: (i) of less than 8 litres; or (ii) of at least 8 litres but not exceeding 48 litres and not designed to connect to a pressurised gas delivery system, pump delivery system or other system prescribed for the purposes of subitem 1.1, 1.5 or 1.10 of that Schedule (if any); then, for the purposes of this Act, that repackaging is taken to be the manufacture of beer (subject to subsection (2)). ... (2) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to the repackaging of the first 10,000 litres of beer, at particular premises in a financial year, in relation to which the following conditions are satisfied: (a) the beer is repackaged into exempt beer containers for the purposes of retail sale; (b) the retail sale occurs immediately after the repackaging of the beer. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2), an exempt beer container is a sealed individual container, of no more than 2 litres, that is not pressurised.

[Omitted.]

Section 77HA of the Excise Act provides: 77HA Compressed natural gas that is exempt from excise duty (1) Compressed natural gas is exempt from excise duty if any of the following apply: (a) the gas was compressed for use other than as a fuel for a motor vehicle; (b) the gas was compressed other than in the course of carrying on an enterprise (within the meaning of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999); (c) the gas was compressed for use as a fuel for a motor vehicle that: (i) is designed merely to move goods with a forklift and is for use primarily off public roads; or (ii) is of a kind prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this subparagraph; (d) the gas is exempt from excise duty under subsection (2). (2) Compressed natural gas is exempt from excise duty if: (a) the gas was compressed at residential premises (within the meaning of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999); and (b) the rate at which natural gas can be compressed at those premises is not more than: (i) the amount of compressed natural gas per hour prescribed by the regulations; or (ii) if no amount is prescribed-10 kilograms of compressed natural gas per hour; and (c) the gas is not sold or otherwise supplied in the course of carrying on an enterprise (within the meaning of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999).

Compressed natural gas is manufactured for the purposes of the Excise Act when natural gas is compressed. [59] However, subsection 77HA(1) of the Excise Act provides an exemption from excise duty if the compressed natural gas: • was compressed for use other than as a fuel for a motor vehicle (that is, non-transport use); or • was compressed other than in the course of 'carrying on an enterprise' (within the meaning of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999); or • was compressed for use as fuel in: - a motor vehicle that is designed: • merely to move goods with a forklift; and • for use primarily off public roads; or - motor vehicles of a kind prescribed by the regulations. [60]

Other factors in subsection 77HA(2) of the Excise Act that exempt compressed natural gas from excise duty are related to: • the place where the compression of the natural gas occurs (whether it was compressed at 'residential premises' (within the meaning of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999)); and • the rate at which the compression occurs (the rate at which natural gas can be compressed at those premises is not more than the rate per hour prescribed by the regulations, or where no amount is prescribed - 10 kilograms of compressed natural gas per hour); and • whether the gas was sold or otherwise supplied in the course of 'carrying on an enterprise' (within the meaning of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999).

Section 77HB of the Excise Act provides: Liquefied petroleum gas or liquefied natural gas is exempt from excise duty if: (a) the liquefied petroleum gas or liquefied natural gas is used by a licensed manufacturer on premises specified in the manufacturer licence; and (b) the use is in the process of manufacturing: (i) petroleum condensate or stabilised crude petroleum oil; or (ii) liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas or other hydrocarbons; and (c) the manufacturer manufactures the goods referred to in paragraph (b) in accordance with the licence.

Liquefied petroleum gas is manufactured or produced for excise purposes when hydrocarbon gases undergo processes that compress them to a liquid state - liquefied petroleum gas has new qualities/properties that are very different from hydrocarbon gas. [61]

Liquefied natural gas is manufactured or produced for excise purposes when natural gas is liquefied through cooling - liquefied natural gas has new qualities/properties that are very different from natural gas. [62]

However, section 77HB of the Excise Act provides an exemption from excise duty if: • the liquefied petroleum gas or liquefied natural gas is used by a licensed manufacturer on premises specified in the manufacturer licence; and • the use is in the process of manufacturing petroleum condensate or stabilised crude petroleum oil or liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas or other hydrocarbons; and • the petroleum condensate or stabilised crude petroleum or liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas or other hydrocarbons is manufactured in accordance with the licence. [63]

Blending constitutes manufacture or production for excise purposes where same, similar or dissimilar goods are blended resulting in a new or different product having a distinctive character or use, subject to specific provisions which affect whether the blending constitutes manufacture [64] (for example, blending spirits or fuels), or whether the end product of blending is dutiable under the Schedule. [65]

Section 77FM of the Excise Act provides that for greater certainty, spirit blending to produce spirit is taken to constitute the manufacture of those goods for the purposes of the Excise Act, and that the Commissioner may specify the circumstances in which spirit blending is taken not to constitute the manufacture of spirit for the purposes of Item 3 of the Schedule. [66] Under this section, the blending of 'like' with 'like' spirit (for example, blending whisky with whisky whether they are imported or local) to produce such goods amounts to the manufacture of those goods for excise purposes.

Section 77G of the Excise Act provides that for greater certainty, fuel blending to produce goods covered by paragraph 10(g) of the Schedule is taken to constitute the manufacture of those goods for the purposes of the Excise Act. Under this section, the blending of 'like' with 'like' fuel (for example, blending diesel with diesel whether they are imported or local) to produce such goods amounts to the manufacture of those goods for excise purposes.

Paragraph 10(g) of the Schedule covers blends of one or more of the products specified in paragraphs 10(a) to 10(f) of the Schedule (with or without other substances) other than blends covered by subsections 77H(1) or 77H(3) of the Excise Act. [67]

Subsection 77H(1) of the Excise Act excludes from paragraph 10(g) a blend of one or more eligible goods (goods covered by paragraphs 10(a) to 10(f) of the Schedule) (with or without other substances) where either the: • applicable excise duty or a duty of Customs has been paid on all products and other substances (if any) included in the blend, and the rate of duty paid on all products and other substances in the blend is the same (apart from denatured ethanol for use in an internal combustion engine or biodiesel, which must have been duty paid at their applicable duty rates); or • goods have been covered by a determination in force under subsection 95-5(1) of the Fuel Tax Act. [68]

However, subsection 77H(1) of the Excise Act does not apply if any of the eligible goods or other substances on which excise duty or a duty of Customs has been paid are taxable fuel for which an entity has been entitled to a fuel tax credit under the Fuel Tax Act. [69]

Subsection 77H(2AA) of the Excise Act ensures that for the purposes of paragraph 77H(1)(a) of that Act, when determining whether eligible goods and other substances have been duty paid at the same rate, differences in rate due to any of the following should be disregarded: • any indexation of rates under section 6A of the Excise Tariff Act; and • any indexation of rates under section 19 of the Customs Tariff Act; and • any changes of rates under the Excise Tariff Act as a result of amendments of that Act by Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Excise Tariff Amendment (Fuel Indexation) Act 2015; and • the effect of sections 19AAB and 19AAC of the Customs Tariff Act. [69A]

Subsection 77H(2A) of the Excise Act excludes blends of one kind of relevant fuel from paragraph 10(g) of the Schedule where both of the following apply: • none of the amounts of the relevant fuel are subject to a remission (either in full or in part) of excise duty or a duty of Customs; and • the excise duty or a duty of Customs that is payable on the amounts of the relevant fuel has been paid. [70]

Subsection 77H(2B) of the Excise Act excludes from paragraph 10(g) of the Schedule goods that are the product of the blending of amounts of one kind of relevant fuel that is either liquefied petroleum gas or liquefied natural gas if, for each amount in the blend, either of the following applies to the amount: • the amount is subject to a remission (whether in full or in part) of excise duty or a duty of Customs on the grounds that the amount is not used, or intended for use, in an internal combustion engine in either a motor vehicle or a vessel; or • the amount is not subject to excise duty or a duty of Customs because the amount was manufactured, produced or imported before 1 December 2011. [71]

Furthermore, subsection 77H(3) of the Excise Act excludes blends otherwise covered by paragraph 10(g) of the Schedule, if circumstances specified in a legislative instrument [72] exist. An example of a blend covered by legislative instrument is where a person blends duty-paid oil with duty-paid petrol for use (as two stroke petrol) in their lawn mower. [73]

Section 77J of the Excise Act excludes from subitems 10.25, 10.26, 10.27, 10.28 or 10.30 of the Schedule certain goods which are manufactured or produced by a recycling process. [74]

The exclusion applies where: • the fuel was previously delivered for home consumption [75] under subitem 10.25 (liquid aromatic hydrocarbons), subitem 10.26 (mineral turpentine), subitem 10.27 (white spirit), subitem 10.28 (petroleum products, other than blends, not elsewhere included in another subitem of item 10), or subitem 10.30 (blends not elsewhere included in another subitem of item 10); • the fuel was used as a solvent; • the person who used the fuel as a solvent recycles it for the person's own reuse as a solvent; and • the recycled fuel is the same type of product as originally delivered for home consumption.

Paragraph 10(d) of the Schedule makes reference to liquid hydrocarbon products ' ... derived through a recycling, manufacturing or other process' [emphasis added], without defining the meaning of 'derived'.

Accordingly, for the purposes of paragraph 10(d) of the Schedule, the term should be given its ordinary meaning in the context in which the term is used.

The Australian Oxford Dictionary [76] relevantly defines 'derive' to mean: 1. (usu. foll. by from) get, obtain, or form.

In Cooper Bros , Deputy President Alpins found that oil may only be regarded as being 'derived through' a process for the purposes of paragraph 10(d) if it emerged from the process as a 'new and different article'. [76A] Alpins DP noted that this was the same factual question that governed whether or not the oil could properly be said to have been manufactured or produced. [76B]

The expression 'other process' in paragraph 10(d) serves to capture any method by which you derive a liquid hydrocarbon product, such as a production process.

The Schedule makes specific reference to 'recycling' in item 10 (paragraph 10(d) makes reference to goods '... derived through a recycling, manufacturing or other process') while item 15 of the Schedule refers to petroleum based oils or greases and their synthetic equivalents that are 'recycled' for use as oils or greases.

The terms 'recycling' or 'recycled' are not defined in the Excise Acts.

The Macquarie Dictionary [77] defines 'recycle' as recycle verb (t) (recycled, recycling) 1. to treat (waste, empty bottles, old tins, etc.) so that new products can be manufactured from them. 2. to prepare (something) for a second use, often with some adaptation or reconstruction.

The Chambers Dictionary [78] and Australian Oxford Dictionary [79] provide the following definitions of recycle: v.t. to put (waste materials) through a manufacturing process by which they can be reused. v,tr. return (material) to a previous stage of a cyclic process, esp. convert (waster) to reusable material.

Given that excise duty is to be imposed on goods dutiable under the Schedule and 'manufactured or produced in Australia' [80] in accordance with section 5 of the Excise Tariff Act, in the Commissioner's view 'recycling' must be read within this framework. The goods in this case are liquid hydrocarbon products derived through a recycling process and classifiable to paragraph 10(d) of the Schedule; and recycled oils or greases and their synthetic equivalents classifiable to item 15 of the Schedule.

Accordingly, recycling (which includes filtering, de-watering, de-mineralisation, screening, separation of contaminants by settlement, centrifuge and refining) must result in something new or different from that out of which it is made as result of some process. The recycled product must have a distinctive character or use. [81]

Whether a liquid hydrocarbon product is derived through a recycling process for excise purposes is a question of fact and degree.

For example, if a process recycles used oils by reducing the amount of contaminants or impurities, and the chemical and/or physical composition of the recycled oil is different from the used oils as collected, transforming the used oils into a new or different product having a distinctive character or use, then that recycled oil has been manufactured or produced for the purposes of the Excise Acts. [82]

The Commissioner considers that the mere removal of foreign objects from the collection of used oil, [83] such as nuts and bolts, is an activity that only results in the product achieving the state it was in at the time it became used oil. The process does not manufacture or produce something new or different having a distinctive character or use from the used oil as collected. [84] This product would not be considered to be derived through a process that amounts to manufacturing or producing a good for the purposes of excise.

The Commissioner further considers that it follows from Cooper Bros that the mere removal of water and other extrinsic impurities from used oil, through a filtering and de-watering process, does not result in something new or different having a distinctive character or use. The end product could not be said to be derived through a recycling, manufacturing or other process for the purposes of paragraph 10(d).

The processes referred to in paragraph 10(d) of the Schedule (that is, recycling, manufacturing or other process) constitute manufacture or production where the processes result in something new or different having a distinctive character or use.

An alternative view (to that expressed at paragraph 145A of this Ruling) is that filtering and de-watering used oil will amount to manufacture or production in instances where it is physically impossible to employ the used oil (as collected) as a burner fuel. This may be the case where, for example, the amount of water that exists with the collected used oil is significant enough to prevent the solution from burning.

In such a case, it is questionable whether the used oil could properly be said to be 'suitable for use as a burner fuel' at the time it is collected. If it cannot, this would represent a key point of distinction from the Cooper Bros case. [84A]

The Commissioner considers that the inherent characteristics of used oil are such that, in all cases, it is correct to regard it as 'suitable for use as a burner fuel'. It is acknowledged that, in any given case, high amounts of water or other extrinsic impurities in the used oil at the time it is collected may make it questionable whether the oil, as it then stands, could be used as a burner fuel. However, taking into account the relative ease at which these extrinsic impurities could be removed, the Commissioner does not consider that their presence should lead to a different conclusion.

The Commissioner also notes that, if the alternative view were to prevail, oil recyclers would be required to perform tests at the point of collection to determine whether or not the oil they collect could be used as a burner fuel. This would increase compliance costs. Additionally, under the alternative view, the imposition of excise would turn on an extremely fine distinction, and it would mean that an oil recycler that collected oil with a marginally higher water content than its competitors may be liable to pay excise when its competitors are not.

The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: Paragraph Summary - what this Ruling is about 1 Background 2 Interpretation 12 Class of entities 13 Ruling 14 Meaning of 'manufactured or produced' 15 Factors that may be taken into account in determining whether something new or different thing has been manufactured or produced in an excise context include: 17 The thing did not previously exist 17 A different thing from that out of which it is made or results 19 Change in form 20 Differences in its utility 21 Improving the goods 22 Subjective intention is relevant but not determinative 23 Quality or value of incidental goods 24 Goods for own consumption 25 Application of skill, knowledge or labour 26 Example 1: manufacture or production of an excisable good 27 Example 2: manufacture or production of an excisable good and a non-excisable good 31 Example 3: manufacture or production of an excisable good 36 Example 4: no manufacture or production of an excisable good 39 Excise provisions that modify, clarify or operate within the meaning of 'manufactured or produced' and provisions that exempt excisable goods for certain uses from excise duty 42 Tobacco curing - exemption 43 Repackaging of beer - taken to be manufacture 44 Example 5: repackaging that is the manufacture of an excisable good 45 Example 5A: repackaging that is not the manufacture of an excisable good 46A Example 5B: repackaging that is the manufacture of an excisable good 46D Compressed natural gas for certain uses - exempt from excise duty 47 Liquefied petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas - exempt from excise duty 50 Blending 53 Example 6: blending that is the manufacture or production of an excisable good 58 Example 7: blending that is not the manufacture or production of an excisable good 62 Processes in deriving a liquid hydrocarbon product 65 Recycling 66 Example 8: recycling that is not the manufacture or production of an excisable good 70 Example 9: recycling (filtering and de-watering only) that is not manufacturing or producing an excisable good 75A Example 10: recycling that is manufacturing or producing an excisable good 76H Date of effect 88 Appendix 1 - Explanation 90 Meaning of 'manufactured or produced' 90 Subjective intention is relevant but not determinative 96 The thing did not previously exist 98 Differences - including change in form, utility and improvements 100 Complexity is not determinative but may be relevant 105 Application of skill, knowledge or labour 107 Excise provisions that modify, clarify or operate within the meaning of 'manufactured or produced' and provisions that exempt excisable goods for certain uses from excise duty 110 Section 68 of the Excise Act - Exemption for the curing of tobacco 111 Section 77FC of the Excise Act - Repackaging of beer taken to be manufacture 114 Section 77HA of the Excise Act - Exemption for compressed natural gas for certain uses 116 Section 77HB of the Excise Act - Exemption for liquefied petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas for certain uses 119 Blending 123 Section 77FM of the Excise Act - Spirit blending is to be treated as manufacture 124 Section 77G of the Excise Act - Fuel blending is to be treated as manufacture 125 Section 77H of the Excise Act - Blending exemptions 126 Section 77J of the Excise Act - Recycling of solvents 131 Liquid hydrocarbon products derived through a recycling, manufacturing or other process 133 Derived 133 Items 10 and 15 of the Schedule - the reference to 'recycling' or 'recycled' 137 Filtering and de-watering - alternative view 146A Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list 147