Were you a resident of Australia for taxation purposes for the relevant income year?
No. This ruling applies for the following period : Year ended 30 June 20XX The scheme commenced on: 1 July 20XX
You were born in Country Z. You are a citizen of both Australia and Country Z. You came to Australia a number of years ago. You became a permanent resident of Australia a few years after arriving. You became a citizen of Australia. You purchased a property in Australia which was your main residence. You suffered a severe health issue. You lived and worked in Australia from the year you arrived until several years ago. Your relative came to Australia to assist you, and you moved to Country Z with them. You and your relative moved to Australia and both of you moved to Country Z a few months later. You got COVID and could not travel to Australia due to the lockdowns. You remained living in Country Z for a few years. You rented the Australian property out for a few years until it was sold. You rented an accommodation in Country Z. You purchased a retirement apartment in Country Z. You have also been diagnosed with another medical condition. You continue to have treatments for this condition in Country Z. Your relative has been your primary carer. Some of your relatives died during this period.
You and your relatives moved to Australia to see if you could return to living independently in Australia. You and your relative moved to Country Z as you could not live independently at this stage. You do not have a spouse. You do not have any dependants. You do not meet any of the life events tests in subsections 118-110(3) and (4) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 . You are not eligible to contribute to the PSS or the CSS Commonwealth superannuation funds.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 6(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 995-1
Section 995-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) defines an Australian resident for tax purposes as a person who is a resident of Australia for the purposes of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). The terms 'resident' and 'resident of Australia', as applied to an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. The definition offers four tests to ascertain whether each individual taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes. These tests are: • the resides test (also referred to as the ordinary concepts test) • the domicile test • the 183-day test, and • the Commonwealth superannuation fund test. The resides test is the primary test for deciding the residency status of an individual. This test considers whether an individual resides in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word 'resides'. Where an individual does not reside in Australia according to ordinary concepts, they will still be an Australian resident if they meet the conditions of one of the other tests (the domicile test, 183-day test and Commonwealth superannuation fund test).
Our interpretation of the law in respect of residency is set out in Taxation Ruling TR 2023/1 Income tax: residency tests for individuals . We have considered the statutory tests listed above in relation to your situation as follows: The resides test The ordinary meaning of the word 'reside' has been expressed as 'to dwell permanently or for a considerable time, to have one's settled or usual abode, to live, in or at a particular place': See Commissioner of Taxation v Miller (1946) 73 CLR 93 at 99 per Latham CJ, citing Viscount Cave LC in Levene v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1928] AC 217 at 222, citing the Oxford English Dictionary. Likewise, the Macquarie Dictionary defines 'reside' as 'to dwell permanently or for a considerable time; have one's abode for a time'. The observations contained in the case of Hafza v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 6 FCR 444 are also important: Physical presence and intention will coincide for most of the time. But few people are always at home. Once a person has established a home in a particular place - even involuntarily: see Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Lysaght [1928] AC 234 at 248; and Keil v Keil
[1947] VLR 383 - a person does not necessarily cease to be resident there because he or she is physically absent. The test is whether the person has retained a continuity of association with the place - Levene v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1928] AC 217 at 225 and Judd v Judd (1957) 75 WN (NSW) 147 at 149 - together with an intention to return to that place and an attitude that that place remains "home": see Norman v Norman (No 3) (1969) 16 FLR 231 at 235... [W]here the general concept is applicable, it is obvious that, as residence of a place in which a person is not physically present depends upon an intention to return and to continue to treat that place as "home", a change of intention may be decisive of the question whether residence in a particular place has been maintained. The Commissioner considers the following factors in relation to whether a taxpayer is a resident under the 'resides' test: • period of physical presence in Australia • intention or purpose of presence • behaviour while in Australia • family and business/employment ties • maintenance and location of assets
• social and living arrangements. It is important to note that no one single factor is decisive, and the weight given to each factor depends on everyone's circumstances. Because the resides test is about whether an individual resides in Australia, the factors focus on the individual's connection to Australia. Having a connection with another country, or being a resident of another country, does not diminish any connection to Australia. The ordinary meaning of reside does not require an individual to have a principle or usual place of residence in Australia. Application to your situation You have been living and working in Australia. You suffered a severe health issue. Your relative came to Australia to care for you, and you both moved to Country Z. You got COVID, and you could not travel to Australia due to lock downs. You rented an accommodation for a short period of time in Country Z, then you purchased a retirement apartment in Country Z. Your relative has been your primary carer. You have been diagnosed with another medical condition, and you continued to have treatments for this condition in Country Z.
You sold your main residence in Australia after renting it out for a few years. You and your relative moved to Australia to see if you would be able to return and live independently. You and your relative moved to Country Z. You were not residing in Australia in the relevant income year according to ordinary concepts. Your day-to-day life is in Country Z. You are therefore not a resident under this test. Domicile test Under the domicile test, you are a resident of Australia if your domicile is in Australia unless the Commissioner is satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia. Domicile Whether your domicile is in Australia is determined by the Domicile Act 1982 and the common law rules on domicile.
Your domicile is your domicile of origin (usually the domicile of your father at the time of your birth) unless you have a domicile of dependence or have acquired a domicile of choice elsewhere. To acquire a domicile of choice of a particular country you must be lawfully present there and hold the positive intention to make that country your home indefinitely. Your domicile continues until you acquire a different domicile. Whether your domicile has changed depends on an objective consideration of all relevant facts. Application to your situation In your case, you were born in Country Z, and your domicile of origin is Country Z. You got citizenship of Australia. You are a citizen of both Australia and Country Z. Therefore, your domicile is Country Z, and your domicile of choice is Australia. Permanent place of abode If you have an Australian domicile, you are an Australian resident unless the Commissioner is satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia. This is a question of fact to be determined considering all the facts and circumstances of each case. 'Permanent' does not mean everlasting or forever, but it is to be distinguished from temporary or transitory.
The phrase 'permanent place of abode' calls for a consideration of the physical surroundings in which you live, extending to a town or country. It does not extend to more than one country, or a region of the world. The Full Federal Court in Harding v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCAFC 29 held at paragraphs 36 and 40 that key considerations in determining whether a taxpayer has their permanent place of abode outside Australia are: • whether the taxpayer has abandoned, in a permanent way, living in Australia • whether the taxpayer is living in a town, city, region, or country in a permanent way. The Commissioner considers the following factors relevant to whether a taxpayer's permanent place of abode is outside Australia: • the intended and actual length of the taxpayer's stay in the overseas country • whether the taxpayer intended to stay in the overseas country only temporarily and then to move on to another country or to return to Australia at some definite point in time
• whether the taxpayer has established a home (in the sense of dwelling place; a house or other shelter that is the fixed residence of a person, a family, or a household), outside Australia • whether any residence or place of abode exists in Australia or has been abandoned because of the overseas absence • the duration and continuity of the taxpayer's presence in the overseas country • the durability of association that the person has with a particular place in Australia, i.e. maintaining assets in Australia, informing government departments such as the Department of Social Security that he or she is leaving permanently and that family allowance payments should be stopped, place of education of the taxpayer's children, family ties and so on. As with the factors under the resides test, no one single factor is decisive, and the weight given to each factor depends on the individual circumstances. Application to your situation The Commissioner is satisfied that you have a permanent place of abode outside Australia because: • You have been living in Country Z for several years.
• You purchased a retirement apartment in Country Z, which can be considered as establishing a home, outside Australia. • You have abandoned your residence or place of abode in Australia. • There is no indication that you would return to Australia at a definite point in time. • You are therefore not a resident under this test. 183-day test Where a person is present in Australia for 183 days or more during the year of income the person will be a resident, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that both: • the person's usual place of abode is outside Australia, and • the person does not intend to take up residence in Australia. Application to your situation You were not in Australia for more than 183 days in the relevant income year. You are therefore not a resident under this test. Superannuation test An individual is a resident of Australia if they are either a member of the superannuation scheme established by deed under the Superannuation Act 1990 or an eligible employee for the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1976 , or they are the spouse, or the child under 16 of such a person.
Application to your situation You are not a member on behalf of whom contributions are being made to the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS) or the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS) or a spouse of such a person, or a child under 16 of such a person. Therefore, you are not a resident under this test. Conclusion : You are not a resident of Australia for taxation purposes for the relevant income year.