Is the Fund excluded from liability to withholding tax on interest, dividend and non-share dividend income derived from its Australian investments in accordance with paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?
Yes This ruling applies for the following period : 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX The scheme commences on: 1 July 20XX
The Fund The Fund was established under legislation in the foreign country and the employer is the administrator of the Fund. Company A was appointed as plan administrator of the Fund. The Fund is sponsored by Company A through a Trust and Custodial Agreement with Trust A. The Fund has sponsoring companies, the Participating Companies, who remains a sponsor of the Fund for its own employees. Responsibilities of the Fund have been delegated to the Board Committee. The Pension Plan is a defined benefit pension plan (the DB Plan) and a qualified retirement plan under the legislation of the Foreign State. The Plan The retirement age and benefit are dependent on the Pension Plan. Funding of the Penson Plan is through contributions. Investments in Australia The Fund does not hold any right to appoint a person to a board, committee or similar, either directly or indirectly. The Fund has not entered into or received any side letters, arrangements or agreements. The Fund does not hold any veto rights on security holder votes. The Fund does not hold any other influence potentially of a kind described in subsection 128B(3CD) of the ITAA 1936. Other facts
The Fund is an indefinitely continuing fund and a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund. The Fund was established in a foreign country. The Fund was established, and is maintained, only to provide benefits for individuals who are not Australian residents. The central management and control of the entity is carried on outside Australia by entities none of whom is an Australian resident. An amount paid to the entity or set aside for the entity has not been or cannot be deducted under the ITAA 1997. A tax offset has not been allowed or is not allowable for such an amount. The income of the Fund is not non-assessable non-exempt income of the Fund because of: i. Subdivision 880-C of the ITAA 1997; or, ii. Division 880 of the Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 paragraph 128B(3)(jb)
Broadly, paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936 provides an exclusion from withholding tax for interest, dividends and non-share dividends derived by a superannuation fund for foreign residents (subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions). For the exclusion to apply, the interest, dividend and/or non-share dividend income must be: derived by a superannuation fund for foreign residents (as defined in section 118-520 of the ITAA 1997, and exempt from income tax in the country in which the superannuation fund for foreign residents arise. The Treasury Laws Amendment (Making Sure Foreign Investors Pay Their Fair Share of Tax in Australia and Other Measures) Act 2019 introduced extra requirements that must be met for paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936 to apply from 1 July 2019 onwards. These extra requirements apply only to assets which were acquired after 27 March 2018. For the purposes of this private ruling, which only considers the Fund's Australian investments which were acquired before 27 March 2018, these extra requirements are not applicable. Each of the requirements of paragraph 128B(3)(jb) will be considered below. The Fund is a non-resident
The Fund is a resident of the Foreign State. Therefore, the Fund satisfies this requirement. The Fund is a superannuation fund for foreign residents Superannuation fund for foreign residents is a defined term in the ITAA 1936. Subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 states: superannuation fund for foreign residents has the meaning given by subsection 995-1(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. Subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 sets out the following: superannuation fund for foreign residents has the meaning given by section 118-520. Section 118-520 of the ITAA 1997 states the following: (1) A fund is a superannuation fund for foreign residents at a time if: (a) at that time, it is: (i) an indefinitely continuing fund; and (ii) a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund; and (b) it was established in a foreign country; and (c) it was established, and is maintained at that time, only to provide benefits for individuals who are not Australian residents; and (d) at that time, its central management and control is carried on outside Australia by entities none of whom is an Australian resident. (2) However, a fund is not a superannuation fund for foreign residents if:
(a) an amount paid to the fund or set aside for the fund has been or can be deducted under this Act; or (b) a *tax offset has been allowed or is allowable for such an amount. Consequently, for the Fund to be considered a superannuation fund for foreign residents for the purposes of paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936, it must be established that: • the Fund is an indefinitely continuing fund • the Fund is a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund • the Fund was established in a foreign country • the Fund was established and maintained only to provide benefits for individuals who are not Australian residents • the central management and control of the Fund is carried on outside of Australia by entities none of whom are Australian residents • no amounts paid to the Fund or set aside for the Fund has been or can be deducted under the ITAA 1997, and • no tax offsets have been allowed or would be allowable for an amount paid to the Fund or set aside for the Fund. i. The Fund is an indefinitely continuing fund
Neither the ITAA 1936 or the ITAA 1997 provide guidance on the meaning of 'indefinitely continuing', however, the ordinary meanings of 'indefinitely' and 'continuing' involve little ambiguity or controversy. The Australian Oxford Dictionary defines the 'indefinitely' as '1. for an unlimited time...2. in an indefinite manner' and 'continuing' as '...persist in, maintain, nonstop'. Based on the relevant facts and circumstances described in this ruling, the Fund was established under legislation and there is no indication that there is any contemplation of the Fund ending at a defined point in time Therefore, the Fund satisfy this requirement. ii. The Fund is a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund The phrase 'provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund' under subparagraph 118-520(1)(a)(ii) of the ITAA 1997 is not defined in either the ITAA 1936 or the ITAA 1997. The phrase, however, has been subject to judicial consideration. In Scott , Windeyer J stated at 278:
There is no definition in the Act of a superannuation fund. The meaning of the term must therefore depend upon ordinary usage...I have come to the conclusion that there is no single attribute of a superannuation fund established for the benefit of employees except that it must be a fund bona fide devoted as its sole purpose to providing for employees who are participants money benefits (or benefits having a monetary value) upon their reaching a prescribed age. In Mahony v Commissioner of Taxation (1967) 41 ALJR 232, Kitto J stated at 232:
There was no definition in the Act of 'a provident, benefit or superannuation fund', and the meaning of the several expressions must therefore be arrived at in light of ordinary usage and with only one piece of assistance to be gathered from the immediate context. Since a fund, if its income was to be exempt under the provision, was separately required to be one established for the benefit of employees, each of the three descriptive words 'provident', 'benefit' and 'superannuation' must be taken to have connoted a purpose narrower than the purpose of conferring benefits, in a completely general sense, upon employees. Precise definition may be difficult, and in any case is unnecessary for present purposes. All that need be recognized is that just as 'provident' and 'superannuation' both referred to the provision of a particular kind of 'benefit' - in the one case a provision against contemplated contingencies, and in the other case a provision, to arise on an employee's retirement or death or other cessation of employment, of a subvention for him or his estate or persons towards whom he may have stood in some kind of relation commonly giving rise to a legal or moral responsibility - so 'benefit' must have meant a benefit, not in a general sense, but characterized by some specific future purpose. A funeral benefit is a familiar example.
In Cameron Brae Pty Limited v FCT (2007) 161 FCR 468, the Full Federal Court held that the relevant fund was a superannuation fund for the purposes of former section 82AAE of the ITAA 1936. Jessup J stated at 506: In answering the question whether the fund was a "superannuation fund" as the term is ordinarily understood, it is, in my view, critical that payments could not have been made out of the fund (other than by way of administration expenses, taxation, etc) save to members of the relevant discretionary class, and save in circumstances which fell within the ordinary understanding of superannuation. A proper characterisation of the fund should, in my view, depend upon the purposes for which the assets and moneys of the fund might have been used rather than upon the quality of the rights of individual members of the fund. If the fund could have been used only to achieve what might be described as a superannuation purpose, I would describe the fund as a "superannuation fund". That a particular member of a discretionary class might not, ultimately, have received any payment, was not, in my view, disqualifying. ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2009/67
Income Tax: Superannuation fund for foreign residents (ATO ID 2009/67) refers to these authorities and provides the following guidance on the meaning of the phrase: The courts have held that for a fund to be a 'provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund', the fund's sole purpose must be to provide superannuation benefits, that is, benefits to a member upon the member reaching a prescribed age or upon their retirement, death or other cessation of employment ( Scott v. FC of T (No 2) (1966) 14 ATD 333; (1966) 10 AITR 290, per Windeyer J; Mahony v. FC of T (1967) 14 ATD 519, per Kitto J; Walstern Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation (2003) 138 FCR 1; 2003 ATC 5076; (2003) 54 ATR 423, per Hill J and Cameron Brae Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 161 FCR 468; 2007 ATC 4936; (2007) 67 ATR 178, per Stone and Allsop JJ). The relevant authorities therefore establish that in order for a fund to qualify as a 'provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund', it must have the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits or benefits in other contemplated contingencies (such as death, disability or serious illness).
The Fund was established under legislation and the employer is the administrator of the Fund. Company A was appointed as plan administrator of the Fund. The Participating Companies remains a sponsor of the Fund for its own employees. The primary purpose of the Fund is to provide one component of an individual's ongoing income after retirement. Retirement income is provided either from the Fund or through financial vehicles outside of the Fund. The financial vehicles outside the Fund are employee choices after transferring out of the Plan so the Plan has no responsibility for these employee choices The Fund offers a DB Plan with a sole purpose is to provide the relevant members benefits including retirement, death, disability and survivor benefits. To be able to access these benefits, members will need to reach the retirement age specific to the plan they are a member of. These benefits are consistent with the ordinary meaning of 'superannuation fund'. Therefore, the Fund satisfies this requirement. iii. The Fund was established in a foreign country The Fund was established in the Foreign State. Therefore, the Fund satisfies this requirement. iv.
The Fund was established and is maintained only to provide benefits for individuals who are not Australian residents The Fund was established and is maintained, for the sole purpose of providing superannuation benefits for persons other than persons who are or would ordinarily be or become residents of Australia. It is considered that the possibility of a very small number of members being returned residents or becoming Australian residents after ceasing eligible employment is incidental. Therefore, the Fund satisfies this requirement. v. The central management and control of the Fund is carried on outside of Australia by entities none of whom are Australian residents Paragraphs 20 and 21 of Taxation Ruling TR 2008/9 Income tax: meaning of 'Australian superannuation fund' in subsection 295-95(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 states in respect of the central management and control (CM&C) of a superannuation fund:
20. The CM&C of a superannuation fund involves a focus on the who, when and where of the strategic and high level decision making processes and activities of the fund. In the context of the operations of a superannuation fund, the strategic and high level decision making processes includes: o formulating the investment strategy for the fund; o reviewing and updating or varying the fund's investment strategy as well as monitoring and reviewing the performance of the fund's investments; o if the fund has reserves - the formulation of a strategy for their prudential management; and o determining how the assets of the fund are to be used to fund member benefits.
21. The other principal areas of operation of a superannuation fund that form part of the day-to-day or operational side of the fund's activities will not constitute CM&C. These activities do not form part of the CM&C of the fund because they are not of a strategic or high level nature. Rather, these activities are of a more formalistic or administrative nature. Examples of such activities include the acceptance of contributions that are made on a regular basis, the actual investment of the fund's assets, the fulfilment of administrative duties and the preservation, payment and portability of benefits. Furthermore, paragraphs 10 and 11 of Taxation Ruling TR 2018/5 Income tax: central management and control test of residency states: 10. Central management and control refers to the control and direction of a company's operations. It does not refer to a physical location in which the control and direction of a company is located, and may ultimately be exercised in more than one location.
11. The key element in the control and direction of a company's operations is the making of high-level decisions that set the company's general policies, and determine the direction of its operations and the type of transactions it will enter. Based on the facts and circumstances outlined in this ruling, the central management and control of the Fund is carried on outside Australia by entities none of whom is an Australian resident. Therefore, the Fund satisfy this requirement. vi. No amount paid to the Fund or set aside for the Fund has been or can be deducted under the ITAA 1997 and no tax offset has been allowed or is allowable for such an amount No contributions to the Fund are capable of being claimed as a tax offset or as a deduction under either the ITAA 1997 or the ITAA 1936. Therefore, the Fund satisfies this requirement. Conclusion As all of the above requirements are satisfied, the Fund meets the requirements of being a superannuation fund for foreign residents as defined by section 118-520 of the ITAA 1997 for the purposes of subparagraph 128B(3)(jb)(i) of the ITAA 1936. Consists of interest or dividends and/or non-share dividends paid by a company that is a resident
The Fund will receive interest income and/or dividend income from companies who are residents of Australia. Therefore, this requirement is satisfied. The Fund is exempt from income tax in the country in which the non-resident resides The Fund is exempt from income tax on its interest and dividend income in its country of residence. Therefore, this requirement is satisfied. Subsection 128(3CA) of the ITAA 1936 The Treasury Laws Amendment (Making Sure Foreign Investors Pay Their Fair Share of Tax in Australia and Other Measures) Act 2019 introduced extra requirements that must be met for paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936 to apply. Generally, these extra requirements apply to income derived from 1 July 2019. Relevantly: • The Fund must satisfy the 'portfolio interest test' in relation to the test entity (subsection 128B(3CC) of the ITAA 1936) • The Fund must satisfy the 'influence test' (subsection 128B(3CD) of the ITAA 1936) in relation to the test entity, and • The income cannot otherwise be non-assessable non-exempt income of the Fund because of: a. Subdivision 880-C of the ITAA 1997, or b. Division 880 of the
Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 . Each of these requirements are discussed in detail below. The Fund satisfies the 'portfolio interest test' Subsection 128B(3CC) of the ITAA 1936 states: A superannuation fund satisfies the portfolio interest test in this subsection in relation to the test entity at a time if, at that time, the total participation interest (within the meaning of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ) the superannuation fund holds in the test entity: (a) is less than 10%; and (b) would be less than 10% if, in working out the direct participation interest (within the meaning of that Act) that any entity holds in a company: (i) an equity holder were treated as a shareholder; and (ii) the total amount contributed to the company in respect of non-share equity interests were included in the total paid-up share capital of the company.
In this case, the Fund will receive interest income and/or dividend income from companies who are residents of Australia. The Fund holds less than 10% of the total participation interests in each of the Australian resident entities. Further, the Fund would hold less than 10% of the total participation interests in the Australian resident entities in the circumstances detailed in paragraph 128B(3CC)(b) of the ITAA 1936. The Fund therefore satisfies the 'portfolio interest test' in respect of its investments in the Australian entities. The Fund satisfies the 'influence test' Subsection 128(3CD) of the ITAA 1936 states: A superannuation fund has influence of a kind described in this subsection in relation to the test entity at a time if any of the following requirements are satisfied at that time: (a) the superannuation fund: (i) is directly or indirectly able to determine; or (ii) in acting in concert with others, is directly or indirectly able to determine; the identity of at least one of the persons who, individually or together with others, make (or might reasonably be expected to make) the decisions that comprise the control and direction of the test entity's operations;
(b) at least one of those persons is accustomed or obliged to act, or might reasonably be expected to act, in accordance with the directions, instructions or wishes of the superannuation fund (whether those directions, instructions or wishes are expressed directly or indirectly, or through the superannuation fund acting in concert with others). As such, there are two distinct sub-tests within the influence test. Sub-test 1 of the influence test, as contained in paragraph 128B(3CD)(a) of the ITAA 1936, assesses whether the Fund is able to determine the identity of at least one of the persons who, individually or together with others, makes or is reasonably expected to make, decisions comprising the control and direction of the test entity's operations. This includes situations where the Fund is able to act in concert with others to determine the identity of a relevant decision-maker in the test entity. Sub-test 1 also extends to situations where the Fund, in its own right, holds the ability to approve or veto decisions which go to the control or direction of the test entity.
Sub-test 2 of the influence test, as contained in paragraph 128B(3CD)(b) of the ITAA 1936, assesses whether at least one of the relevant decision-making persons of the test entity is accustomed or obliged to act, or might reasonably be expected to act, in accordance with the directions, instructions or wishes of the Fund. Relevantly, in respect of the Australian investments: • The Fund does not hold any right to appoint a person to a board, committee or similar, either directly or indirectly. • The Fund has not entered into or received any side letters, arrangements or agreements. • The Fund does not hold any veto rights on security holder votes. • The Fund does not hold any other influence potentially of a kind described in subsection 128B(3CD) of the ITAA 1936. Based upon the above, the Commissioner accepts that the Fund does not have influence of a kind described in subsection 128B(3CD) of the ITAA 1936. Otherwise non-assessable non-exempt The income received by the Fund will not be non-assessable non-exempt income because of Subdivision 880-C of the ITAA 1997 or Division 880 of the Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 .
Therefore, the Fund satisfies this requirement. Conclusion The Fund is excluded from liability to withholding tax on its dividend income derived from its Australian investments to the facts and circumstances of this ruling under paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936.