1 Can you claim a deduction for costs of the two visits by Company X to the Property under section 25-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to the extent that the invoiced amounts relate to the inspection of the pipes and clearing of a blocked sewer?
1 Yes. Section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction for the cost of repairs to premises used for income producing purposes. However, subsection 25-10(3) of the ITAA 1997 does not allow a deduction for repairs where the expenditure is of a capital nature. Taxation Ruling TR 97/23 Income tax: deductions for repairs explains the principles and the circumstances in which expenditure incurred for repairs is an allowable deduction. In accordance with the principles contained in TR 97/23 it is viewed that the activities undertaken by Company X during their visits to the Property were partially in relation to drain and sewer pipes related activities, being plumbing maintenance. Therefore, a deduction can be claimed under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997 to the extent that the invoiced amounts from Company X relate to activities undertaken in relation to the drain and sewer pipes of the Property. Question 2 Can you claim a deduction for any costs incurred in relation to the drain and sewer pipes related activities undertaken by Company Z under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997? Answer 2 Yes.
In accordance with the principles contained in TR 97/23 the activities undertaken in relation to the activities involving the drain and sewer pipes at the Property were to restore the function and effectiveness of the Pipes. Therefore, a deduction can be claimed for the costs incurred for Company Z to undertake the activities in relation to the drain and sewer pipes under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997. Question 3 Can you claim a deduction for the costs incurred in relation to the paving activities undertaken by Company Y under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997? Answer 3 Yes. In accordance with the principles contained in TR 97/23, the paving related activities were undertaken as a result of, and as part of, the activities undertaken in relation to the Pipes related activities. Therefore, a deduction can be claimed in relation to the paving related activities undertaken by Company Y under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997. This ruling applies for the following period: Year ending 30 June 20XX The scheme commenced on: 1 July 20XX
You purchased a property (the Property) a significant period ago. You had not obtained a property/building inspection prior to purchasing the Property. The Property is located on a corner block. The Property was made available for rent after settlement had occurred and has continued to be rented since then. You engaged the services of a property manager to manage the Property (the Property Manager). Plumber's visits The services of Company X were engaged by the Property Manager to attend an emergency blockage at the Property which included clearing a blocked sewer. You were invoiced for their visit. You became aware of the issues with the sewer and drain pipes following the visit by Company X's to the Property when they had undertaken a CCTV inspection of the pipes. Company X attended the Property again with their tax invoice indicating that the following activities had been undertaken during their visit: • List of activities supplied You paid for the invoiced amounts as outlined above during the ruling period. Sewer and drain pipe activities
Company X recommended Company Z to undertake the activities in relation to the Pipes due to the scope of the work required, whose services you engaged. The affected pipes are located at the rear of the Property. Details supplied of location of affected pipes. You were advised that allsections of the clay sewerage pipes that could be viewed using the CCTV camera were in poor condition, being cracked and no longer level, with root ingress in multiple locations through the length of the viewed area. The area viewed using the CCTV camera was from the outlet of the XX to the connection to the Council owned sewer main on Street B, being most of the Main Line. The XX Branch was able to be accessed with the CCTV camera, but not the XX Side Branch.
Once the connection point between the XX and the Main line had been exposed the CCTV camera was used to assess the condition of the XX Side Branch pipe. It was identified that this portion of the clay pipes were also in poor condition. While there had not been any issues in relation to those pipes at that point, it was decided to extent the works to include the XX Side Branch as it was likely that issue would start occurring with them within a short period of time as the pipe was badly cracked in several locations. To prevent any damage to the XX slab a new pipeline was installed, with part of the Main Line put in a different location. The new Main Line ran from the XX of the Property along the rear of the house, with a fork prior to the XX which went to the XX and XX. After the fork the Main Line then continued in a straight line on the outside of the XX before turning at a 90-degree angle and continuing to the edge of the house where it forked, with one pipeline going to the XX, and the other pipeline going to the XX. All portions of the of the Main Line and the XX Branch were replaced with new PVC pipe.
The XX pipe was only accessible for a short length as it passes underneath the XX retaining wall before it reached the XX. The only option was to put an internal epoxy lining within the existing clay pipe resulting in the construction of a new epoxy pipe within the existing pipe. Relining was undertaken to the existing main XX Branch pipe which extends to the XX, and the existing Side Branch to the ORG. The existing pipe from the ORG to the XX and XX could not be lined with the clay pipe remaining in original condition. Company X issued a quote in relation to the Pipes related activities, issuing a tax invoice in relation to the work completed at the Property during the ruling period, indicating that the variation works in relation to the epoxy lining of some of the pipes would be charged separately. Company X issued a tax invoice in relation to the variation works for the epoxy relining activities. Portions of the original pipes under the XX and XX were not repaired due to inaccessibility without significant demolition and those pipes were excluded from the Pipe related activities. The tenants continued to live at the Property while the activities in relation were undertaken.
You paid for the activities undertaken by Company X during the ruling period. You did not make, nor will you make, an insurance claim in relation to the sewerage pipe activities. Paving activities As a result of the Pipe related activities several areas of pavers located in the backyard of the Property. Company Y provided a quote in relation to works to X sections of pavers in the backyard of the Property which included the following activities: • List of activities supplied The paving activities were undertaken, and were paid, during the ruling period.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 25-10 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 25-10(3)