Preamble
No, a salary or wage earner operates on a cash receipts basis and, by definition, can never have a bad debt for taxation purposes. As a consequence, he or she cannot claim a deduction under section 63.
However, this does not mean that the employee will be assessed on income that he or she has not actually received. Salary or wage income is only assessable when it has been derived, and salary or wages are only derived when paid. In Tilley v Official Receiver in Bankrupcy [1960] 103 CLR 529 at 535 Kitto J, in an observation on payment by cheque, stated that ' There can be no doubt that the acceptance of a payment by cheque implies, if there be nothing to the contrary, an agreement that it shall be considered as payment, subject to the condition subsequent that if the cheque be dishonoured it shall no longer be so considered.' In Mackenzie v Rees [1941] 65 CLR 1 at 15, Dixon J expressed a similar view.
In a New Zealand case, Ullrich v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [1963] 13 ATD 321 at 323, Perry J stated that an amount is derived by a person only where it has been ' credited in account or reinvested or accumulated or capitalised or carried to any reserve, sinking or insurance fund or otherwise dealt with in his interest or on his behalf.' His Honour reviewed the authorities on the subject of payment by cheque and concluded that they ' establish that the giving of a cheque is payment conditional on its being met '.
Accordingly, where salary or wages are paid by dishonoured cheques, there is no payment of salary, and hence no derivation of income.