Income tax: is there a deemed assessment under section 166A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 when a company lodges a 'non-taxable return' for a year of income?
No. Section 166A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) does not operate to create a deemed assessment where the return specifies that no amount of tax is payable.
Note: In this determination a 'non-taxable return' means an income tax return lodged by a company that, under the full self-assessment regime, has determined and specified in its tax return it has no liability for income tax in respect of the year of income. This may occur where the company has no taxable income for the year of income or where the tax otherwise payable is extinguished by tax offsets (rebates). [F1] Most tax offsets under provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) are taken to be rebates for the purposes of the ITAA 1936: sections 160ADA and 160AHA of the ITAA 1936. [F2]
In subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936, the term 'assessment' is defined to mean the ascertainment of the amount of taxable income and of the tax payable on that taxable income.
For an income tax assessment to exist, the tax payable must be an amount that is capable of constituting a debt due and payable, the recovery of which can be sued for under normal legal processes: Batagol v. Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 109 CLR 243; Commissioner of Taxation v. Ryan (2000) 201 CLR 109; 2000 ATC 4079; (2000) 43 ATR 694. While zero may be a numeric integer, a zero amount cannot constitute a debt due and payable. The amount ascertained as the tax payable must be represented by a positive integer as one of the elements necessary for an assessment to exist.
A precondition for an assessment to be deemed to have been made under section 166A of the ITAA 1936 is for the taxpayer to specify in its tax return the amount of its taxable income and the tax payable upon that income. Where a company determines that it has no income tax liability for the year of income, no amount of income tax capable of constituting a debt due and payable can be specified in the return form. Accordingly, the lodgment of a 'non-taxable return' cannot result in a deemed assessment under section 166A of the ITAA 1936.
If at a later date the Commissioner issues an assessment to the company increasing its tax payable for the income year, for example, following an audit of the company's affairs, that assessment would be an original assessment and not an amended assessment. The Commissioner's power to issue the assessment would not be restricted by the time limits contained in section 170 of the ITAA 1936.
A company specifies in its return lodged for the income year ended 30 June 2002 that it has a taxable income of $10,000 and claims an entitlement to a rebate under subsection 46(2) of the ITAA 1936 of $3,000. The company's basic tax of $3,000 (calculated at the rate of 30%) is fully offset by the rebate amount and a deemed assessment under section 166A does not arise. As there is no assessment for that year, the Commissioner's power to issue an assessment would not be restricted by the time limits contained in section 170 of the ITAA 1936.
A company specifies in its return lodged for the income year ended 30 June 2002 that it has a taxable income of $10,000 which it has derived from foreign sources. The company has paid $3000 foreign tax on that income. It makes a self-determination under section 160AIA of the ITAA 1936 and pursuant to section 160AF it claims a foreign tax credit in the amount of $3,000. In these circumstances the company has a deemed assessment under section 166A for $3,000 tax payable (calculated at the rate of 30%) and the Commissioner's power to issue a later assessment would be subject to the time limits under section 170 of the ITAA 1936. The foreign tax credit claimed does not form part of the assessment: 160AI(2). However, the credit is applied by the Commissioner in the manner provided for by section 160AN to discharge the company's liability to pay the amount of the income tax assessment.
When the final Determination is issued, it is proposed to apply both before and after its date of issue. However, the Determination will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).
We invite you to comment on this draft Taxation Determination. We are allowing 4 weeks for comments before we finalise the Determination. If you want your comments considered, please provide them to us within this period. Comments by date: 25 March 2004 Contact officer details have been removed following publication of the final ruling.