Goods and services tax: assignment of payment streams including under a typical securitisation arrangement

This Ruling explains the Commissioner's view on how the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) and the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Regulations 2019 (GST regulations) apply to the supply of rights to a payment stream by means of an assignment.

In particular this Ruling deals with the supply of a right to a payment stream arising from the following types of transactions: • Loan portfolios; • Finance and operating leases; • Hire purchase agreements; • Residential/commercial property leases; • Royalty agreements; and • Credit card receivables.

This Ruling also deals with issues related specifically to debt factoring and typical securitisation arrangements.

It does not cover circumstances where there is: • a mere redirection of a payment from one entity to another; and • a novation of an agreement that gives rise to a payment stream.

For the purposes of this Ruling the term 'assignor' is used to refer to the entity that first assigns the right to a payment stream. Where the term 'originator' is used this refers to an assignor under a typical securitisation arrangement.

Certain terms in this Ruling are defined or explained in the Definition Section of the Ruling. These terms, when first mentioned in the text in the body of the Ruling, appear in bold type.

Unless otherwise stated all legislative references in this Ruling are to the GST Act.

This Ruling applies both before and after its date of issue. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10 Public Rulings ). Note: we welcome submissions on the date of effect of the draft changes to paragraphs 107A to 107AAB of this Ruling.

[Omitted.]

[Omitted.]

Item 2 in subsection 40-5.09(3) of the Regulations refers to a debt, credit arrangement or right to credit, including a letter of credit. The examples applicable to item 2 in Schedule 2 of the Regulations include the right to an income stream under a securitisation arrangement.

While the example refers to a right to an income stream under a securitisation arrangement, we consider that in the context of the Regulations, item 2 covers payment streams that are not necessarily 'income'. This Ruling therefore refers to a payment stream rather than an income stream. We also consider that item 2 applies to a right to a payment stream in other circumstances besides under securitisation arrangements.

One of the common methods by which the right to a payment stream is provided or acquired is through an assignment. Some arrangements, identified in paragraphs 13 and 14 of this Ruling, do not involve an assignment of rights to a payment stream as contemplated by this Ruling.

Where an entity merely redirects the payment of an amount due to it to another entity there is no assignment of the right to the payment stream. It is an arrangement for the payment of amounts receivable by one entity from another to a third party. The payment may be the consideration for a supply by the entity receiving the payment.

Typically a novation involves the creation or substitution of a new agreement between the original parties to an agreement and a third party. [1] Apart from a novation effected by statute all parties must agree to a novation in order to give enforceable rights or obligations to the third party. An assignment of a chose in action by contrast, does not require the participation of all the original parties. [2]

A securitisation arrangement is the process whereby an entity packages and converts legal or beneficial title to future receivables and kindred assets into marketable debt securities which are traded in the capital market. [3] Securitisation is widely used because of the advantages it offers in terms of management of risk and raising funds.

Many institutions in Australia now offer debt securities backed by a wide variety of assets that include residential mortgages, commercial property loans, lease, credit card and trade receivables. These assets commonly have predictable cash flows, are small compared to the overall pool of assets, are reasonably homogeneous in terms of maturity and risk profile, and have similar terms and conditions.

Securitisation structures vary according to the objectives of the originating institution, the assets involved, and the targeted investors but are all essentially variations on a theme. [4] A typical securitisation structure is as follows:

The main feature of a typical securitisation arrangement is the establishment of a special purpose vehicle (SPV) under either trust or corporations law. The purpose of the SPV is to acquire receivables and any associated collateral rights from an originating institution. The SPV pays for the receivables by issuing debt securities (or notes) backed by the receivables. A more detailed explanation and discussion of a typical securitisation arrangement is provided at paragraphs 92 to 125 of this Ruling.

The provision, acquisition or disposal of an interest in or under a debt is a financial supply under item 2 of subsection 40-5.09(3) of the Regulations. Provided the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied the supply of the right to a payment stream by way of assignment is a financial supply as it is the provision, acquisition or disposal of an interest in a debt.

Section 196-1.01 of the Regulations provides that an interest in relation to a financial supply is anything that is recognised at law or in equity as property in any form. Relevant examples of an interest include a debt or right to credit and a right to future property. [5] The term interest is therefore given its broadest meaning so that an interest is as wide as the legal and equitable concept of property, including rights under a contract. [6]

One of the matters listed in item 2 of subsection 40-5.09(3) of the Regulations is debt. Debt is not defined in the GST Act or the Regulations and therefore takes its general meaning unless a contrary intention appears. [7] When not expanded by particular words or phrases the ordinary legal usage of the term debt is an obligation actually incurred. [8]

Subsection 40-5.09(3) of the Regulations deals with interests in or under debt. The term interest, in relation to debt, extends to an existing contractual right to a debt that will arise in the future.

A debt is a chose in action. In the general law it is usual to talk of the assignment of a chose in action, rather than provision, acquisition or disposal of an interest. For GST purposes an assignment comes within the meaning of disposal [9] of an interest. There are two methods of assignment: • a legal assignment; and • an equitable assignment.

Neither method requires any particular form of words. However, in both instances, a clear expression of an intention to assign is required and the subject matter of the assignment must be identified with certainty. [10]

Certain formalities are required for an effective legal assignment. These are set out in legislation in every Australian jurisdiction [11] and can be summarised as follows: (a) the assignment must be absolute and not purport to be by way of charge; (b) it must be in writing under the hand of the assignor; and (c) express notice must be given to the debtor in writing. [12] If an assignment fails to comply with these requirements (for example, it is only part of an existing chose in action like the assignment of part of an interest in a partnership in Everett's case), it may be effective as an equitable assignment. The law as to equitable assignments has been discussed in a number of cases in the High Court of Australia dealing with assignments for income tax purposes: Norman, [13] Shepherd, [14] Everett [15] and Booth. [16]

So far as is relevant for present circumstances, these cases establish that the equitable assignment of a presently existing right to a payment stream (such as part of the royalties under an existing licence of a patent as in Shepherd's case) is effective immediately as an assignment.

An assignment of an expectancy (such as the right to dividends on shares as in Norman's case or the right to rent on a lease that has not yet been entered into as in Booth's case) is effective, when the right to the payment arises in the future, if the assignment is for consideration.

The term equitable assignment is used in both cases, though in the latter case it may more accurately be described as a 'contract to assign' when the relevant property comes into existence as explained by Windeyer J [17] in Norman's case. The agreement will take effect as an equitable assignment of the right immediately upon the assignor acquiring ownership of the right and provided it is capable of being identified with certainty as the one to which the agreement to assign applied. [18]

Until such time as the right has crystallised, the interest of an assignee of future property for valuable consideration is more than merely contractual. Equity regards the assignee as having a prospective interest in the property to be acquired which has some of the incidents of a proprietary right. [19] It is an interest for the purposes of the Regulations which includes rights under a contract. [20]

Provided there has been an effective legal or equitable assignment of a right to all or part of a payment stream, or an agreement to assign the right to a payment stream that arises in the future there will be the supply of an interest in or under a debt. This is a financial supply under item 2 of subsection 40-5.09(3) of the Regulations provided the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are also satisfied.

There is an alternative view that a purported assignment of a future debt, which is a mere expectancy, cannot be characterised as the provision, acquisition or disposal of an interest in a debt. This is on the basis that there can be no interest 'recognised at law or in equity as property in any form', [21] in a debt which has not yet come into existence. This view assumes that it is not possible to have a proprietary interest, at law or in equity, in something that does not exist.

According to the alternative view, there is an assignment of the actual debt when it comes into existence, rather than an assignment of a 'future debt'. This is consistent with the effect of a purported assignment of future property, which has no legal effect, but which equity treats as an agreement to assign with the assignment taking effect immediately upon the property coming into existence.

The Commissioner considers the better view to be that, for the reasons set out at paragraphs 23 to 30 of the Ruling, an agreement to assign future debts involves the disposal of an interest in a debt which, if the other elements of section 40-5.09 of the Regulations are satisfied will constitute a financial supply at that point. That is, both the assignment of an interest in debt and an agreement to assign debt are financial supplies provided subsection 40-5.09(1) is satisfied.

It is necessary in some cases to distinguish the assignment of underlying property from the assignment of a payment stream arising from the property. For example if the owner of a building that is leased sells real property in the form of the freehold in the building, to another person subject to the existing lease (the reversion), the purchaser will be entitled to the rent from the building as its owner. In an abstract sense it can be said that the former owner has assigned the right to rent but it is not an assignment of the rental stream in the sense that is generally understood in the law when referring to assignments of rights to payment streams (Mason CJ in Booth). [22]

Where real property subject to an existing lease is sold, upon the sale of the reversion, a supply continues to be made to the lessee. [22A]

If there is no sale of the building but only an assignment of the rental stream, there are two supplies relevant in applying the GST, the rental of the building by its owner, and the dealing in the stream of rental payments which will be a financial supply if the conditions of regulation 40-5.09 are satisfied.

The same distinction between assignment of the payment stream and assignment of underlying property applies to sales of shares (discussed in Norman) [23] and of an interest in a partnership as opposed to the income from the partnership interest (Everett's [24] case). However, in these cases whether it is the payment stream, or the underlying property that is sold, the GST treatment of the supply will be the same because the supply of the shares or the interest in the partnership can be a financial supply in its own right. This is in contrast to the different GST treatment of the supply of the rental stream from the supply of the building which may be subject to GST.

In some of the cases with which this Ruling deals, bare payment streams such as trade and credit card receivables are assigned. Although there are related transactions, being the supplies of goods or services that give rise to the receivables, the recipient obtains only those receivables and not the other rights and obligations that flow from the related transactions.

Although the circumstances are different, the outcome is similar to assignment of rental streams. There are two relevant transactions for GST purposes, the supplies of the goods or services (which relate to their supplier) and the assignment of the receivables which will be a financial supply if the conditions of section 40-5.09 of the Regulations are satisfied. In the case of credit card receivables, the receivable itself arises out of a financial supply, being the provision of credit by the credit card company to its credit card customer.

Where the payment stream arises from secured or unsecured loans or other credit arrangements the assignment of the right to the payment stream will not be effective in making the assignee the provider of credit following the assignment unless the parties enter into a novation.

In addition to the right to receive the payment stream, other things covered by the assignment might include all right, title and interest in or to: • related documents, records and accounts; • payments arising from enforcement action; • any ancillary rights; • any related security; and • all rights in the underlying asset which is the subject of the particular receivables agreement. Whether this amounts to an assignment of the underlying property as opposed to an assignment of the right to the payment stream will depend on an analysis of the transaction.

If the original owner of the underlying property continues to have rights to the property or functions to perform, it is likely that the transaction will be characterised as an assignment of the payment stream, rather than a sale of the underlying property. In this event the assignment of the right to the payment stream together with the related rights is a composite supply.

The supply is composite [25] because the supply of the related rights is considered integral, ancillary or incidental to the dominant part of the assignment which is of the right to the payment stream. The supply of the related rights is not seen as an end in itself but rather it merely contributes to or complements the use or enjoyment of the dominant part of the supply. The composite supply is a financial supply of an interest in or under a debt on which no GST liability arises if the provisions of section 40-5.09 of teh Regulations are satisfied.

Since an assignment of a payment stream does not change the underlying supply, the assignor retains the obligation to make the underlying supply and remit any GST liability in respect of that supply.

RentCo leases a number of commercial properties to tenants. It assigns the payment streams from the leases to OpportunistCo for valuable consideration. RentCo must continue to remit GST on the rental payments for the duration of the relevant leases as it is the supplier under the lease agreements.

If, on the other hand, there is a transfer of legal ownership of underlying property, as in the case of an outright sale, that carries with it a payment stream, the GST consequences of the supply of the property after the assignment will be determined by reference to the circumstances of the purchaser. In addition the GST consequences of the supply of the underlying property to the purchaser will have to be determined according to the relevant provisions.

Following the transfer of legal ownership of the underlying property, the purchaser of that property will be the supplier under the arrangement which gives rise to the payment stream. If the supply under that arrangement is a taxable supply, for example a lease of a motor vehicle or office equipment, the purchaser may be required to register and remit GST if the other requirements of section 9-5 are satisfied.

So long as the assignor continues to make the underlying supply, it will be entitled to claim input tax credits or reduced input tax credits, as the case may be, on its acquisitions to make that supply in much the same manner as before the assignment occurred.

Where the assignor has previously made predominately taxable supplies the assignment of the payment stream, being a financial supply, may cause it to exceed the financial acquisitions threshold. [26] The assignor will then need to consider its entitlement to input tax credits including the apportionment of certain acquisitions not directly related to the underlying supply. [27]

Because the assignor is still obligated to perform some functions as the supplier it will make acquisitions that relate to performing those obligations. Whether or not there is an entitlement to input tax credits for these acquisitions will depend on the GST character of that underlying supply.

At law the obligation to remit GST on an underlying taxable supply where the associated payment stream has been assigned, may exist for a number of years depending on the term of the particular agreement that gives rise to the payment stream. [28] The assignor may have to take this into account at the time that the right to the payment stream is assigned.

In practice, the assignor may ensure that there are sufficient funds available to it to meet this obligation in a number of ways. It may, for example, partially assign the right excluding an amount to meet the assignor's obligation to pay GST or it may reflect the GST component in the pricing methodology for the assignment of the right. [29]

The basic attribution rules are set out in Division 29. The rules differ according to whether the entity accounts for GST on the cash or the non-cash basis. Special rules also apply to the attribution of GST on supplies, made by non-cash basis suppliers, that are made progressively or for a period. [30]

The assignor of the debt is the entity that makes the supply to which the debt relates. Whether the payment by the debtor is made to the assignor (as trustee for the assignee) or to the assignee directly, the assignor continues to be liable for any GST on the supply.

The supply is made for consideration, and, depending on the nature of the supply, may be a taxable supply if all the other criteria in section 9-5 are met. Depending on the basis of accounting for GST, the supplier is required to attribute GST under section 29-5 to the extent that any consideration is received (cash basis) or in full on the earlier of receipt of any consideration or issue of an invoice (non cash basis). It does not specify that the supplier needs to issue the invoice, nor that the supplier must receive the consideration.

Where an entity assigns a payment stream arising from taxable supplies that the entity makes and the entity accounts on the cash basis, GST is attributed to the tax period in which consideration is received for the supply, but only to the extent that the consideration is received in the tax period. [31] The amount of GST payable is 1/11th of the amount paid to either the assignor or the assignee depending on the arrangements that exist following the assignment.

Subject to the operation of Division 156 which is about progressive or periodic supplies, for an entity operating on a non-cash basis, attribution occurs at the earlier of the tax period in which any of the consideration for the supply is received, or in which an invoice is issued. [32]

Division 156 modifies the basic attribution rules to attribute GST as if each progressive or periodic component of the supply were a separate supply. [33] In the case of a lease Division 156 has the effect of treating each periodic or progressive component as if it were a separate supply for attribution purposes which is then accounted for in accordance with section 29-5. [34] The GST is attributed to the tax period in which a separate invoice for a particular component is issued or when the periodic or progressive payment for that particular component is received.

For an effective legal assignment there is a mandatory requirement to give express notification of the assignment to the debtor. Notification may also be given of an equitable assignment in order to preserve priorities, for example in an insolvency, and to prevent the debtor from obtaining a valid discharge of the debt from the assignor. [35] Where notification is given, the debtor is bound to make payments to the assignee from that point onwards.

In a practical sense this raises an issue about which entity is to provide an invoice, for example, where separate invoices are issued for each progressive or periodic component of a lease. An invoice is defined in section 195-1 to mean 'a document notifying an obligation to make a payment'. What this means is that the document must not only inform the recipient of a presently existing obligation to make a payment but also the amount of that payment. [36] It is also desirable that an invoice contains sufficient information to identify or ascertain the date of issue, the supplier and the recipient. [37]

In paragraph 32 of GSTR 2000/34 it is accepted that a third party can issue an invoice notifying an amount payable by one party to another. Therefore, where the assignor and assignee agree, it will be sufficient for the assignee to issue an invoice to the debtor to trigger attribution of the GST payable by the assignor provided the requirements set out in paragraph 60 of this Ruling are satisfied.

A similar issue arises for tax invoices in cases where the underlying supply that gives rise to the payment stream is a taxable supply. The responsibility for issuing a tax invoice rests with the supplier except in circumstances where the Commissioner has determined that recipient created tax invoices may be issued. [38]

The fact that the supplier has assigned the right to the payment stream does not relieve that entity of the obligation to provide a tax invoice to the recipient of the supply within 28 days if there is a request from the recipient to do so. [39]

Alternatively an existing document may already satisfy the requirements for a tax invoice for a supply or all components of a supply. For example, a lease agreement and supporting schedule setting out the price of each component of the supply can satisfy the requirements. [40]

Division 21 of the GST Act provides for adjustments [41] for bad debts, for the purpose of working out net amounts of GST payable, where an entity accounts for GST on a basis other than the cash basis. Requirements for a decreasing or an increasing adjustment include that the whole or part of a debt is written off as bad, or is overdue for 12 months or more.

Where a debt that arises from an underlying taxable supply is assigned, by legal or equitable means, it is no longer the property of the assignor. [42] In this situation the assignor is unable to write off any of the debt and claim a decreasing adjustment if it subsequently turns bad. However if the whole or part of the debt remaining is reassigned by the assignee, then the original assignor is again able to write off the whole or that part reassigned and claim a decreasing adjustment accordingly.

The assignee of the debt will not be entitled to any adjustment under Division 21 because: • they are not the supplier in the underlying transaction that gave rise to the right to the debt or payment stream; and • in any event, the assignment of the debt is a financial supply that does not attract GST.

In some instances an entity may assign only a portion of the right to a payment stream to another entity. In these circumstances it could be the case that the assignor incurs an income tax liability on that portion of the payment stream that the assignor retains.

Section 17-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 provides that the GST amount payable on a taxable supply is not assessable or exempt income of an entity. This applies in the context of a partial assignment of a right in which the assignor retains an amount to meet its obligation to pay GST so that that amount is not included in the assessable income of the assignor.

Each of the payment streams arising from the contracts discussed below represents a right that is capable of assignment according to the principles discussed in paragraphs 23 to 33 of this Ruling. The right to the payment stream is property of a kind that fits the description of an interest in a matter mentioned in item 2 of subsection 40-5.09(3) of the Regulations.

A loan is a financial supply under item 2 of subsection 40-5.09(3) provided the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied, as it is the provision of an interest in or under a credit arrangement or right to credit. The loan agreement also gives rise to a presently existing right to receive payments of principal and interest from the debtor.

The presently existing right to the payment stream is property and an interest in debt for the purposes of the definition of 'interest' in section 196-1.01 of the Regulations. Assignment of this property is the disposal [43] of an interest in a debt for GST purposes. The disposal of the interest, by way of assignment, is a financial supply if the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied.

While there are differences between finance and operating leases, these are not relevant in determining the GST consequences of an assignment of the right to the payment stream. Under either type of lease the agreement typically provides for periodic payments, from the lessee, over the term of the lease, plus the residual amount in the case of a finance lease. Both the periodic payments and the residual amount are part of the payment stream, the right to which exists under the particular lease agreement.

The residual amount under a finance lease is recovered by the lessor, by offering the asset for public sale, in the first instance. The lessee is required to meet any shortfall in the sale proceeds up to the residual amount and may receive anything in excess of this amount. Neither the payment of a shortfall nor receipt of an excess has any GST consequences for the assignment of the right to the payment stream. [44]

Both types of lease agreement are for a taxable supply provided the requirements of section 9-5 are satisfied. Each lease agreement also gives rise to a presently existing right to the payment stream that is property and an interest for the purposes of regulation 40-5.02.

Assignment of this property is the disposal of an interest in or under a debt for GST purposes. The disposal of this interest is a financial supply if the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied. Disposal of this interest does not affect the obligation of the assignor to remit GST on the taxable supply by way of the lease.

A real property lease gives rise to a presently existing right to receive rental payments for the term of the lease. Typically leases also include options for further leases upon conclusion of the current term. A commercial property lease is a taxable supply provided the requirements of section 9-5 are satisfied.

The presently existing right to the payment stream under a current lease is property and an interest in debt for the purposes of the definition of 'interest' in section 196-1.01 of the Regulations. The right to a payment stream under a lease yet to come into existence, because it is dependent on the exercise of an option, is future property. [45] A right to future property is also an interest for the purposes of the definition in section 196-1.01.

The assignment or agreement to assign these forms of property is the disposal of an interest in a debt for GST purposes. The disposal of the interest is a financial supply if the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied. Disposal of this interest does not affect the obligation of the assignor to remit GST on the taxable supply by way of a commercial property lease.

The supply of goods and the supply of credit under a hire purchase agreement entered into on or after 1 July 2012 are taxable supplies if the requirements of section 9-5 are satisfied. [46] In contrast, the supply of credit under a hire purchase agreement entered into before 1 July 2012 is an input taxed financial supply if there is a separate charge for the credit component that is disclosed to the recipient of the goods. [46A] However, this difference in treatment is irrelevant for the purposes of determining the GST consequences of an assignment of the right to the payment stream arising from either type of agreement.

A hire purchase agreement gives rise to a presently existing right to receive regular payments from the debtor. In some circumstances receipt of the final payment may be contingent on the option to purchase the goods being exercised. Even though the payment may be subject to a contingency, the right to the payment stream, under an existing hire purchase agreement, is a presently existing right that is property and an interest for the purposes of the definition in section 196-1.01 of the Regulations.

Assignment of this property is the disposal of an interest in a debt for GST purposes. The disposal of the interest is a financial supply if the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied. Disposal of this interest does not affect the obligation of the assignor to remit GST on the taxable component of a supply by way of a hire purchase agreement.

The supply that is the subject of a royalty agreement or licence is a taxable supply where the requirements of section 9-5 are satisfied. The agreement or licence may provide for payment of royalties that is subject to contingences such as certain production levels being reached or commodity prices achieving certain levels. Even though payments may be subject to contingencies, the right to the payment stream, under an existing agreement or licence, is a presently existing right that is property and an interest for the purposes of the definition in section 196-1.01 of the Regulations.

Assignment of this property is the disposal of an interest in a debt for GST purposes. The disposal of the interest, by way of assignment, is a financial supply if the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied. Disposal of this interest does not affect the obligation of the assignor to remit GST on the taxable supply underlying the royalty agreement or licence.

A credit card receivable arises from a financial supply of an interest under a credit arrangement or a right to credit, under item 2 of subsection 40-5.09(3) of the Regulations provided the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied. A feature of a credit card receivable is that it is usually paid off in a relatively short timeframe. Accordingly arrangements for the assignment of this type of debt may provide for continual assignments, under a master agreement, of the right to debts as they arise.

Each assignment of credit card receivables, under such an arrangement, will represent presently existing debts incurred by cardholders. The right to these debts is property and an interest for the purposes of the definition in section 196-1.01 of the Regulations.

Assignment of this property is the disposal of an interest in a debt for GST purposes. The disposal of the interest, by way of assignment, is a financial supply if the requirements of subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied.

Debt factoring and invoice discounting arrangements commonly involve the assignment of debts by a business to a factor or discounter on a once off or regular basis for an immediate payment. Essentially the difference between the arrangements is that under debt factoring the factor provides additional services of managing the sales ledger which are referred to as sales accounting services. Both arrangements may be regarded as debt factoring arrangements.

Debt factoring arrangements have gained popularity largely because they allow for improved cash flow management and can be a more flexible and cheaper alternative to traditional funding sources. Under the arrangements, book debts are sold to the debt factor for a price that is less than the face value of the debts. The difference between the face value and the purchase price is referred to as a 'discount fee'. Under a factoring arrangement an administration fee is also charged for provision of the sales accounting service. Sales accounting services entail administration of the sales ledger and collection functions by the factor.

Under both debt factoring and invoice discounting the assignment of the book debts is the disposal of an interest in a debt under item 2 in the Regulations. The assignment is for consideration being the discounted purchase price of the book debts and is therefore a financial supply so long as the other requirements in subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied.

Sales accounting services, on the other hand, are not financial supplies. [47] As this service is usually provided for a separate fee it will constitute a taxable supply provided the other requirements in section 9-5 are satisfied. Consideration for the sales accounting service may be represented by a reduction in the price paid to acquire the debts. In these circumstances the sales accounting fee is taken to have been 'netted off' against the consideration for the debts and represents consideration for the taxable supply.

A securitisation arrangement is a complex set of transactions involving a number of entities in the establishment and ongoing maintenance of the arrangement. The major transactions in a typical securitisation arrangement have already been described simply at paragraph 15. They include the sale of receivables to an SPV and the issue of debt securities (or notes) by that entity to fund the acquisition of the receivables.

The receivables sold to the SPV will usually arise from loans, leases, rentals, trade or credit card debts and any associated collateral rights. In some cases however what is sold will be the underlying property that is the subject of the receivables agreement, for example, real property, motor vehicles or office equipment.

Where ownership of the underlying asset passes to the SPV, the GST consequences of transactions following the change in ownership will be determined by reference to the circumstances of the SPV. The focus of the discussion below is on those arrangements where only the rights to payment streams are transferred to the SPV.

Even though most securitisation structures are essentially similar they may vary according to the objectives of the originating institution, the assets involved and the targeted investors. Where the arrangements for a particular securitisation structure or the transactions inherent in that structure do not correspond with the arrangements or transactions described in this Public Ruling, you may apply for a private ruling.

The following diagram and related discussion sets out those elements and transactions common to the majority of typical securitisation arrangements.

The GST consequences associated with each of the following transactions are contained in Schedule 1 of this Ruling. The Schedule is constructed on the basis that the issue of debt securities is not GST-free and no entitlement to an input tax credit is available other than a reduced input tax credit. Where debt securities are issued offshore, an entitlement to an input tax credit may arise to the extent that the acquisitions relate directly or indirectly to any GST-free portion of the issue [48] of the debt securities.

The GST consequences of a typical securitisation arrangement as discussed below and as set out in Schedule 1 have been constructed on the basis that a SPV in the form of a trust is a securitisation entity for the purposes of the definition in section 196-1.01 of the Regulations. A 'securitisation entity' means a trust that has the following features: (a) the trust was established for the purpose of managing some or all of the economic risk associated with assets, liabilities or investments (whether the trust assumes the risk from another person or creates the risk itself); (b) the total value of the debt interests in the trust is at least 50% of the total value of the trust's assets; (c) the trust is an insolvency-remote special purpose entity according to criteria of an internationally recognised rating agency that are applicable to the circumstances of the trust (regardless of whether the agency has determined that the trust satisfies the criteria). [48A]

Acquisitions made by a SPV that is a securitisation entity are not reduced credit acquisitions under item 32 in the table in subsection 70-5.02(1) of the Regulations. [48B] However, an acquisition made by a securitisation entity will be a reduced credit acquisition if it is covered by another item of the table in subsection 70-5.02(1).

The majority of typical securitisation arrangements are conducted through a trust program set up by the originator. The general framework of the program is established under a master trust deed with collateral agreements and instruments governing the operation of the program.

The master trust deed does not actually create any trusts but provides for the establishment of an unlimited number of trusts, referred to as special purpose vehicles, as the need arises. A separate SPV is created for each series of notes issued. Acquisitions which relate to the establishment of the program are taken to be made in carrying on the enterprise of the originator for the purposes of subsection 11-15(1), however for the purposes of 11-15(2)(a) they relate to an input taxed supply being the assignment of the payment stream.

Individual SPVs are created by issue of a notice of creation of a trust. The notice of creation of a trust is usually accompanied by a series notice, supplemental trust deed or similar instrument which sets out the detailed terms of the trust by incorporating or amending the master trust deed as required for that particular series.

The trustee of the trust is usually a professional trustee company specialising in these activities. The trust is an entity pursuant to section 184-1.

The securitisation process commences with the identification of suitable receivables such as mortgages, finance lease or hire purchase contracts (collectively referred to as receivables agreements). The originator may take the receivables from its own portfolio or purchase them from a third party.

Once sufficient receivables have been identified, an offer is made to sell and assign the beneficial interest in the receivables to the SPV, for that series, by issue of a sale notice according to the terms of an associated purchase agreement or other relevant transaction document. Upon acceptance of the offer there is an equitable assignment of an interest in the rights to the receivables to the SPV.

The SPV finances the purchase by issuing debt securities backed by the pool of assets which are the sole assets of the SPV. The consideration provided is usually based on the net present value of the payment stream.

The trustee has a general power to exercise all rights, powers and discretions over the assets of the trust but is subject to direction by the manager in the exercise of such powers. Without limiting the general powers, a number of specific powers are usually set out in the transaction documents. [49]

Under the transaction documents a servicer is appointed primarily to manage the collection of the payment stream for the SPV as beneficial owner. The originator is usually the servicer of the receivables agreements although this function may also be delegated or subcontracted [50] to another entity. Under the latter type of arrangement the originator remains liable for the performance of the services in accordance with the transaction documents.

Under the securitisation documents, servicer services are described as including activities an originator undertakes in relation to receivables it has originated after the initial settlement of the agreement. Such activities may include things done post-settlement of the receivables up to and including discharge, for example provision of payment processing and statement preparation, maintaining security interests, and collection of arrears. The supply of these activities is a taxable supply of services if the requirements of section 9-5 are satisfied. [51]

Paragraphs 107A to 107AAB of this Ruling focus on determining whether acquisitions made by a home loan originator that makes an assignment of loan receivables are made solely or partly for a creditable purpose. [51A] This will be based on whether the acquisitions have a relevant connection to one or more of: • the supply of the loan; • the supply of servicer services to the SPV; or • the supply of the assignment of the loan receivables. [51B]

Paragraphs 107A to 107AAB apply to a typical securitisation arrangement, as described in paragraphs 96 to 125 of this Ruling, for home loan receivables. [51C] The acquisitions made by a home loan originator can be divided into pre-securitisation and post securitisation acquisitions.

Pre-securitisation origination acquisitions are acquired and used by the originator to originate the supply of the loan to the borrower. They are typically acquired leading up to the borrower entering into the loan contract.

Examples of origination acquisitions include mortgage broking services, lender's mortgage insurance, and costs relating to the mortgage security, including property valuations, settlement attendance costs, and title search costs.

These acquisitions are intended for use in making the financial supply of the loan. Where there is a close connection to the making of input taxed supplies, a broader commercial objective of the originator, which includes making supplies of servicer services, will be insufficient to establish a creditable purpose. [51D] In this case, there is not a real and substantial connection to the potential future supply of servicer services.

It is not necessary to determine whether the originator has the requisite intention [51E] to securitise a particular loan at the time of making the origination acquisitions, because in either case the acquisition does not have a relevant connection to the supply of servicer services.

Where the originator does have the requisite intention to securitise the loan, this may give rise to a relevant connection to the financial supply of the assignment of the loan receivables, in addition to the relevant connection to the supply of the loan. [51F] The fact that the originator makes supplies of servicer services as a result of making the supply of the assignment of the loan receivables is insufficient to establish a relevant connection between these acquisitions and the supply of servicer services.

In a typical securitisation arrangement, the originator does not immediately securitise the loan receivables to the SPV. In this pre-securitisation period, the originator has recurring servicing functions to perform, and makes acquisitions relating to payment processing and statement preparation, maintaining security interests, providing customer service and collection of arrears.

As these acquisitions are intended for use in maintaining or servicing the loan before securitisation, the acquisitions relate solely to making the financial supply of the loan. These acquisitions are not for use in maintaining the loan after securitisation, when the originator commences making taxable supplies of servicer services. Pre-securitisation servicing acquisitions relate solely to making financial supplies of loans.

In paragraphs 107A to 107AAB of this Ruling, when the term 'acquisition' is used, it can also refer to the relevant part of an acquisition. For example, when we refer to a post-securitisation servicing acquisition, this would include the part of an acquisition that relates to securitised loans, and not the part that relates to non-securitised loans. For example, an acquisition of statement preparation services for all home loans would be partly intended for use in servicing loans that are not securitised, and partly for use in servicing loans that are securitised.

Once the assignment of the loan receivables has been settled, the originator typically makes a taxable supply of servicer services to the SPV for those receivables. This is described in paragraph 107 of this Ruling.

The creditable purpose of the post-securitisation servicing acquisitions [51G] depends on the functions that the originator performs under the supply of servicer services, and under the supply of the loan to the borrower. These functions need to be determined on a case-by-case basis, in the context of the relevant contractual relationships and other legal obligations.

When the taxable supply of servicer services requires the originator to perform functions that would not have been necessary had the loans not been assigned, any acquisitions relating to those additional functions are solely for a creditable purpose. For example, additional functions such as collating payments for remittance to the SPV, and the provision of reports related to servicer services only arise from assignment of the receivables. They are not functions that the originator performs under the supply of the loan to the borrower.

Other post-securitisation servicing acquisitions that relate to servicing the loan receivables have a relevant connection to both the financial supply of the loan and the taxable supply of servicer services. This is the case when the functions are within the scope of the taxable supply of servicer services the originator makes to the SPV. As stated in paragraph 107 of this Ruling, this may include things done after settlement of the receivables up to and including discharge, for example, providing payment processing and statement preparation, and maintaining security interests.

The supply of the loan to the borrower continues after the securitisation, and the originator will continue to make acquisitions to perform functions to manage its ongoing debtor/creditor relationship with the borrower. The acquisitions relating to the originator's usual functions and responsibilities as the supplier of the loan, including routine matters of repayment and collection, and providing customer service to borrowers, continue to have a relevant connection to that supply. Further examples are provided in paragraphs 107Q to 107AAB of this Ruling.

In principle, the approach to post-securitisation acquisitions could be applicable for some pre-securitisation acquisitions that are used over time. Where a decision has been made to securitise a particular loan, and an acquisition relating to that loan is used over a period of time, some of which will be after the securitisation, then the acquisition may also relate to both the supply of the loan and the intended future supply of servicer services. The ATO would welcome submissions on what acquisitions, if any, fit it into this category.

Note: In each of Examples 2 to 6 of this Ruling, the assigned receivables discussed are home loan receivables relating to home loans secured by a mortgage. In each example, the entity that supplies the loan assigns the loan receivables to an SPV that is carrying on an enterprise in Australia. [51H] In Examples 2 to 4 of this Ruling, the originator does not have the requisite intention to securitise the particular loan when they make the acquisition.

Elf Mutual Bank has an agreement with Barnacle Mortgage Brokers Limited, under which Barnacle introduces potential borrowers to Elf Mutual Bank's loans.

Under the agreement, Barnacle undertakes activities such as: • providing information on Elf Mutual Bank's loan products to potential borrowers and assisting applicants to select a loan product; • conducting loan interviews with applicants and guarantors; • assisting applicants to complete a loan application (including collecting necessary documentation); • assessing factors that are relevant to Elf Mutual Bank's lending criteria; • submitting the applicant's application to Elf Mutual Bank; and • informing the applicant of whether Elf Mutual Bank has approved the loan application.

Elf Mutual Bank is responsible for preparing the loan documents and for all aspects of managing the loans on an ongoing basis.

Once the borrower has drawn down the funds under the loan, Barnacle has completed its mortgage broking supply under the agreement. Barnacle does not provide ongoing services to Elf Mutual Bank in respect of that loan once it has been drawn down.

Elf Mutual Bank pays commissions to Barnacle, which are: • an upfront commission, which is a proportion of the settled amount, paid following the settlement; and • a trail commission, which is a proportion of the borrower's loan balance, paid on a monthly basis.

The acquisition of services from Barnacle help Elf Mutual Bank to determine whether it should enter into a debtor/creditor relationship with potential borrowers, and facilitate Elf Mutual Bank making supplies of loans to new borrowers. The fact that one of the commissions is calculated based on an ongoing trail commission does not alter the nature of the acquisition or how it is for use.

These acquisitions are intended for use in originating supplies of loans, and therefore have a real and substantial connection with the supply of the loan.

In the future, Elf Mutual Bank may make a financial supply of the assignment of the loan receivables, which includes the receivables from loans originated with Barnacle's assistance, to an SPV as part of a typical securitisation arrangement. Following the assignment, Elf Mutual Bank may supply taxable services to the SPV as a servicer of the loan.

There is not a real and substantial connection between the acquisition of broking services from Barnacle and the taxable supply of servicer services.

The acquisition of the supply of services for which the servicer fee is paid is not a creditable acquisition of the SPV as it relates to the input taxed acquisition supply of the payment stream. However, an entitlement to a reduced input tax credit under section 70-5.02 of the Regulations will arise for the SPV in respect of this acquisition. The entitlement may arise, for example, under items 14, 15 and/or 17 of subsection 70-5.02(1). [52]

In making the taxable supply of services to the SPV, the servicer will make acquisitions that relate to the supply. These acquisitions will be for a creditable purpose to the extent that they relate to the supply of those services to the SPV. The acquisitions will give rise to an entitlement to an input tax credit if the other requirements of section 11-5 are satisfied. [52A]

The duties and obligations of the trust manager are usually set out in the Master Trust Deed. The manager has full and complete powers of management over the day to day operations of the SPV. [53]

Custodial services are provided to ensure the safekeeping of the associated documentation in relation to the assets acquired by the SPV. Custodial services may be provided by the originator, in its capacity as servicer, or another entity.

The custodian is required to hold the documents in accordance with procedures contained in the relevant transaction document. The procedures usually require the custodian to keep the documents relating to securitised receivables separate from other similar documents and to report on movements of the documents. [54]

Under a liquidity facility, the liquidity facility provider agrees to make advances to the trustee for the purpose of funding certain income shortfalls in the trust up to predetermined limits. [55]

Credit enhancement, where used, is to protect investors by absorbing credit losses, thereby improving the credit rating and marketability of the securities issued by the SPV.

As investors are not normally prepared to take on all the credit risks associated with the securitised receivables, asset-backed securities are usually provided with credit enhancement by a third-party bank or insurance company and sometimes by the originator. The most common forms [56] of credit enhancement are: • irrevocable letters of credit; • third party insurance; • spread accounts; • cash collateral accounts; • over-collateralisation; and • senior subordinated structures. Different forms of enhancement may be combined in a single arrangement.

The ratings agency assesses the credit rating of the originator, the quality of the underlying assets, and the structure of the arrangement. This assessment will affect the extent of the credit enhancement provided or arranged, especially if the rating of the assets is lower than that desired by potential investors. [57]

The SPV is normally required to give a mortgage or other security over its assets to a security trustee, which holds the benefit of the security on trust for all of the chargees as set out in the transaction documents from time to time. The usual form of security provided to the security trustee is a floating charge over the trust assets.

The charge secures the trustee's obligations under the various transaction documents and in relation to the notes issued by the SPV. The giving of the charge over the SPV's assets is a financial supply under item 3 of subsection 40-5.09(3) of this Regulations if the other requirements in subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied. [58]

Interest rate swap agreements are primarily entered into so that notes issued at a fixed rate or variable interest rate can be matched with income at an equivalent rate from the securitised receivables no matter what rate of interest is being paid on them. [59] Currency swaps may also be entered into if the notes are offered offshore. The swaps are generally governed according to industry standards such as those contained in an International Swaps and Derivatives Association Inc (ISDA) Master Agreement as amended by any supporting schedules. [60]

There are two forms of underwriting. One only requires the underwriter to use their best endeavours to place the securities with investors while the other requires the underwriter to take up any unplaced securities up to an agreed number. The first is referred to as best endeavours underwriting and the underwriter is a financial supply facilitator in relation to the supply of the securities by the SPV. The underwriter's supply of services is a taxable supply to the SPV. [61]

In the other form of underwriting the placement service is complimented by an agreement to take up unsold securities. Taking up the unsold securities is the supply of an interest in securities (or a derivative) as described at items 10 or 11 in the table in subsection 40-5.09(3) of the Regulations. This is a financial supply if the other requirements in subsection 40-5.09(1) of the Regulations are satisfied. In this circumstance the underwriting fee is consideration for both a taxable supply of placement services and a financial supply. [62]

Different classes of notes may be issued. The general arrangement is that there is one class of senior notes and one class of subordinated notes. In the case of mortgage backed loans special classes of notes may be issued to cover the repayment of a redraw granted by the originator. When an originator funds a redraw it is entitled to be reimbursed by the SPV. The SPV may finance the reimbursement in a number of ways one of which is the issue of different classes of notes.

The right to receive payments of interest under subordinate notes is subordinated to the rights of holders of the redraw funding securities, if any, and to the rights of senior note holders.

Definitive notes are not normally issued and it is common for one or more global notes of each class of offered notes to be recorded by book entry registration with a depository. Payments on the offered notes may be made through a paying agent on the nominated payment dates to those entities in whose name the notes are registered.

The notes may be offered for sale in Australia or on overseas capital markets. An offering in an offshore market may result in the supply of the notes being GST-free if the requirements of section 38-190 are satisfied. [63] Where the issue of notes is a GST-free supply, acquisitions in relation to that supply will be for a creditable purpose and the SPV will be entitled to claim full input tax credits on those acquisitions.

The meaning of carrying on an enterprise for GST purposes is substantially the same as the definition of that expression in the A New Tax System (Australian Business Number) Act 1999 . [64] The SPV in a typical securitisation arrangement will be carrying on an enterprise if its activity or activities are done: • in the form of a business; • in the form of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade; and • on a regular or continuous basis, in the form of a lease, licence or other grant of an interest in property. [65]

The SPV in a securitisation arrangement is established for commercial reasons. Investors are invited to invest in professionally managed debt securities issued by the trustee. The relationship between investors, the trustee and the manager is governed by a trust deed, a prospectus and the Corporations Act 2001.

The SPV incurs regular expenses for the provision of support to it by a variety of contracted service providers. Investors receive regular payments of interest and principal amounts under the debt securities program offered by the SPV.

These activities are done in the form of a business and the SPV is therefore carrying on an enterprise and can register for GST purposes. [66]

In addition to the assignment of the right to the payment stream many securitisation arrangements also transfer an interest in any underlying security, associated with the payment stream, to the SPV. Security interests in this context range from traditional security such as mortgages to related security interests including guarantees, indemnities, insurance cover or any other mortgage, lien, charge, encumbrance, hypothecation, preferential right or trust arrangement.

The supply of the interest in the underlying security occurs at the same time as the supply of the right to the payment stream. Any consideration provided at the time of the assignment relates solely to the provision of the right to the payment stream and not to the supply of the interest in the underlying security.

The SPV makes only financial supplies. These supplies are usually input taxed, or may be GST-free if they satisfy the requirements of section 38-190. [68] The financial acquisitions threshold [69] (FAT) is relevant in determining whether an entitlement to input tax credits exists in relation to acquisitions for the purpose of making input taxed supplies.

Entities that make financial supplies in the course of conducting their enterprise without exceeding the financial acquisitions threshold are entitled to input tax credits for acquisitions and importations that relate to making those financial supplies. [70]

A financial acquisition is an acquisition that relates to the making of a financial supply (other than a financial supply consisting of a borrowing). 'Borrowing' is defined in section 195-1 and includes the raising of funds by the issue of a bond, debenture, discounted security or other document evidencing indebtedness.

The issue of debt securities by an SPV therefore constitute a borrowing. The implications for the SPV are that its financial acquisitions do not include acquisitions to the extent they relate to the issue of the debt securities. [71] The SPV also makes acquisition supplies [72] of interests in debt when it acquires the right to the payment stream by way of assignment for consideration. The acquisitions that relate to this acquisition supply are financial acquisitions and will be included in the calculation of the FAT.

If the SPV exceeds the FAT it will not be eligible for full input tax credits on its acquisitions to make input taxed financial supplies, but may be on acquisitions related to GST-free financial supplies it makes. It is anticipated that most SPVs will exceed the FAT and not be eligible for input tax credits except to the extent they are entitled to reduced input tax credits on acquisitions mentioned in section 70-5.02 of the Regulations.

The following table analyses acquisitions and indicates which are financial acquisitions for the purposes of the FAT. An acquisition need not relate to the making of an input taxed financial supply to be a financial acquisition. Division 189 applies to an acquisition that relates to the making of a supply that is a financial supply notwithstanding that GST-free treatment of the supply may override its input taxed status. [73] Acquisition 'relates to' Financial Acquisition Acquisitions for the creation of the SPV (trust) Provision of an interest in debt Yes Acquisitions for the equitable assignment of the right to the payment stream Disposal/acquisition supply of an interest in a debt Yes Manager services 1) acquisition supply of interest in the debts; and 2) provision of securities (borrowing) Subject to apportionment [74] Trustee services 1) acquisition supply of interest in the debts; and 2) provision of securities (borrowing) Subject to apportionment [75] Custodian services Acquisition supply of interest in the debts Yes Servicer services Acquisition supply of interest in the debts Yes Ratings agency service Provision of securities (borrowing) No Underwriting services (best endeavours) Provision of securities (borrowing) No Security Trustee services Provision of interest in a charge Yes Liquidity support facilities Provision of credit facilities (borrowing) No Swap facilities Provision of an interest in a derivative Yes

The recipient of an interest in property by means of an assignment.

The supplier of an interest in property by means of an assignment.

An account in which a deposit equal to the necessary credit enhancement is held for the benefit of holders of the securities. The account will be drawn down if and when losses occur. Cash advances are made to this account by the originator or a third party lender.

The transaction documents will specify which entities are Chargees and will typically include: • the Security Trustee in relation to its rights (held in its own right or for the benefit of other Chargees) under the Security Trust Deed; • the Noteholders in relation to the rights under the Class of Notes held by them; • any Approved Seller in relation to any relevant Accrued Interest Adjustment; • the Chargor in relation to its rights as Trustee under the Trust Documents; • the Manager in relation to its rights as Manager under the Trust Documents; • the Servicer in relation to its rights as Servicer under the Trust Documents; • any Support Facility Provider in relation to its rights under each Support Facility to which it is a party; and • any swap provider under a Hedge Agreement in relation to its rights under that Hedge Agreement.

An intangible personal property right recognised and protected by the law, which has no existence apart from the recognition given by the law, or which confers no present possession of a tangible object, such as the right to payment under a loan contract or the promise to pay on a bill of exchange.

A document provided to each lender which evidences or acknowledges indebtedness to that lender for the amount recorded on the face of the note.

An entity which holds a financial product, or a beneficial interest in a financial product, in trust for, or on behalf of, a client or another person nominated by the client.

An assignment, which is not a legal assignment, but by which the creditor assigns the benefit of a contractual right owed by the debtor to an assignee by demonstrating an intention to assign.

A document which evidences or acknowledges indebtedness to each person named for the amounts noted in a register, executed by a corporation issuing or raising debt. It is an alternative to issuing individual documents to each lender.

A documentary credit or standby letter of credit containing a definite undertaking by the issuing bank that it will perform its obligations according to the mode of realisation of the credit, provided that the stipulated documents are presented and the terms and conditions of the credit are complied with.

An absolute written assignment in which notice of the assignment of the benefit of a contractual right owed is given to the obligor.

The party that enters into receivables agreements with debtors as the creditor. When the originator sells/assigns an interest in the receivables to the SPV it is referred to as the 'assignor'.

A situation where the amount of the securitised receivables exceeds the amount of the securities issued. In such arrangements the excess collateral must be maintained at a level sufficient to provide the agreed amount of credit enhancement. If the value declines below that level the enhancer must fill the gap with new collateral.

A recognised rating agency that determines the rating of the securities issued.

For the purposes of section 70-5.02 of the Regulations, a 'securitisation entity' means a trust that has the following features: (a) the trust was established for the purpose of managing some or all of the economic risk associated with assets, liabilities or investments (whether the trust assumes the risk from another person or creates the risk itself); (b) the total value of the debt interests in the trust is at least 50% of the total value of the trust's assets; (c) the trust is an insolvency-remote special purpose entity according to criteria of an internationally recognised rating agency that are applicable to the circumstances of the trust (regardless of whether the agency has determined that the trust satisfies the criteria). [75A]

The program vehicle will normally be required to give a mortgage or other security over its assets to a security trustee, who holds the benefit of the security on trust for all the investors from time to time.

An arrangement that involves the issue of several classes or tranches of securities of varying seniority. As long as losses do not exceed the face value of the subordinated class(es), the senior class(es) will be repaid in full. The most junior (usually unrated) tranche is often retained by the originating institution.

This entity, often the originator, continues to manage the assets (as the servicer) after they have been acquired by the program vehicle.

A first loss account that is established to absorb credit losses ahead of any securities on issue. Funding of the account is either by initial deposit from the originating institution or a third party, and/or accumulated from excess income over and above the expenses of the transaction that would otherwise flow back to the originating institution.

A form of insurance cover against the first portion of default risk.

Action taken by the entity with a beneficial interest in the securitised receivables to obtain legal title in and to them following a title perfection event as defined.

In structures that use a trust as the SPV, this will normally be a professional trustee company. Its role is usually fairly limited, with the day-to-day administration of the SPV being carried out by the manager.

A typical securitisation arrangement has the following features: • an originator of receivables assigns in equity, for valuable consideration, all of its right, title, benefit, and interest in the receivables, together with any related security interest, to an SPV; • the originator continues to preserve and account for the receivables to the SPV; and • the transaction documents identify a number of elements of consideration for the receivables which are calculated by reference to the face value of the receivables.

Below is a detailed contents list for this Goods and Services Tax Ruling: Paragraph What this Ruling is about 1 Date of effect 8 Background 10 Redirection of payments 13 Novation 14 Securitisation arrangements 15 Ruling and explanation 19 Interest in or under a debt 20 Provision, acquisition or disposal of an interest in or under a debt 23 Alternative view 31 Assignment of payment stream and assignment of underlying property 34 Liability for GST on the underlying supply 44 Example 1 - obligation to remit GST 45 Entitlement to input tax credits 48 Making provision for the GST liability 51 Attribution of GST on the original supply 53 Cash basis 56 Non-cash basis 57 Effect of notice of an assignment to the debtor 59 Issuing invoices notifying an obligation to pay 60 Issuing tax invoices 62 Bad debts and assignments 65 Interaction between GST and Income Tax in a partial assignment 68 Assignment of various types of payment streams 70 Loan agreements 71 Finance and operating leases 73 Residential/commercial property leases 77 Hire purchase agreements 80 Royalties 83 Credit card receivables 85 Debt factoring 88 Securitisation 92 Typical transactions 96 Step 1: Creation of the special purpose vehicle 98 Step 2: Assignment of receivables to the SPV 102 Step 3: Provision of trustee services 105 Step 4: Provision of servicer services 106 Determining the creditable purpose of acquisitions made by a home loan originator 107A Pre-securitisation origination acquisitions 107C Pre-securitisation servicing acquisitions 107H Post-securitisation servicing acquisitions 107K Examples 107Q Example 2 - acquisition of mortgage broking services 107R Example 3 - acquisition of lender's mortgage insurance 107AB Example 4 - other acquisitions to establish home loans 107AK Example 5 - pre-securitisation servicing acquisitions 107AP Example 6 - post-securitisation servicing acquisitions 107AU Step 5: Provision of manager services 110 Step 6: Provision of custodial services 111 Step 7: Provision of liquidity support 113 Step 8: Provision of credit enhancement 114 Step 9: Provision of ratings agency services 116 Step 10: Provision of security trustee services 117 Step 11: Provision of swap facilities 119 Step 12: Provision of underwriting services 120 Step 13: Supply of debt securities 122 Is the SPV carrying on an enterprise? 126 Assignment of security interests 130 Debt securities (borrowings) and the Financial Acquisitions Threshold 132 Definitions 138 Assignee 138 Assignor 139 Cash Collateral Account 140 Chargees 141 Chose in Action 142 Definitive notes 143 Depository 144 Equitable assignment 145 Global Note 146 Irrevocable Letter of Credit 147 Legal Assignment 148 Originator 149 Over-Collateralisation 150 Ratings Agency 151 Securitisation Entity 151A Security Trustee 152 Senior Subordinated Structures 153 Servicer 154 Spread Account 155 Third Party Insurance 156 Title perfection 157 Trustee 158 Typical securitisation arrangement 158A Detailed contents list 159 Schedule 1 page 43 Your comments 159A

You are invited to comment on the draft changes to paragraph 107A to 107AAB of this Ruling, and the date of effect of these changes. Please forward your comments to the contact officer by the due date. Draft update published: 5 April 2019 Due date: 3 May 2019 Contact officer details have been removed following publication of the final ruling.