Preamble
Under the Fuel Tax Act 2006 [1] , you are not entitled to claim a fuel tax credit for fuel used in a motor vehicle that does not meet specified environmental criteria. [2]
Subsection 41-25(2) provides several exemptions including where the motor vehicle is used primarily on an agricultural property in carrying on a primary production business. [3]
This Ruling [4] explains: • what the phrase a 'motor vehicle' means • when a motor vehicle is used 'primarily' on an agricultural property, and • how to account for any fuel used in a motor vehicle which no longer satisfies the environmental criteria.
A 'motor vehicle' is defined in the FTA to mean: 'any motor-powered road vehicle (including a 4 wheel drive vehicle)' [5]
In discussing the environmental criteria, the Revised Explanatory Memorandum to the Fuel Tax Bill 2006 and the Fuel Tax (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2006 (EM) explains that '(t)he criteria are only intended to apply to motor powered road vehicles. They are not intended to apply to vehicles that are not road vehicles'. [6]
The Commissioner considers that the term 'motor vehicle' as defined should be interpreted in a practical and common sense manner, consistent with the explanation provided in the EM.
Accordingly, we do not consider a motor vehicle to be a road vehicle where both of the following apply: • the main function of the vehicle is not related to public road use, and • the vehicle's ability to travel on a public road is secondary to its main function.
Examples of such vehicles which are not road vehicles include road rollers, graders, tractors and earthmoving equipment.
To be exempt from having to meet the environmental criteria, the motor vehicle must: • be used in carrying on a primary production business [7] and • be used primarily on an agricultural property. [8]
The term 'primarily' is not defined in the FTA and takes its ordinary, natural meaning [9] , shaped by the statutory context in which it appears. The courts have interpreted phrases similar to 'primarily' to mean 'more than half'. [10]
The Commissioner considers that the issue of whether a motor vehicle is used primarily on an agricultural property should be interpreted in a quantitative sense, consistent with judicial reasoning and in a practical and common sense manner.
You are using a motor vehicle primarily on an agricultural property when at least one of the following applies: • the motor vehicle travels more than half its total kilometres on an agricultural property • the motor vehicle was used on an agricultural property for an amount of time equating to more than half of the time that the vehicle was used during the calendar year.
When determining the primary use of a vehicle, you may take all relevant factors into consideration, including the amount of time you use the vehicle on the agricultural property and the distance it travels on and off the agricultural property. We accept that as long as one of these factors indicates that the motor vehicle is used primarily on an agricultural property, the test outlined in subparagraph 41-25(2)(a)(ii) will be satisfied.
You have a fuel tax adjustment if your actual use of fuel differs from your projected use. If your vehicle satisfied the environmental criteria when you acquired the fuel, but not when you actually used it, you have an increasing fuel tax adjustment. [11]
John is a wheat farmer who operates a primary production business with his partner Jane. John uses an old diesel tray truck (with a gross vehicle mass (GVM) of over 4.5 tonne) that does not meet the specified environmental criteria.
The diesel tray truck is used: • daily to transport fertiliser, seed, produce, equipment and other goods around the agricultural property, and • twice a week on average to transport produce on a public road to a local market which is approximately 5 kilometres away from the property.
John estimates that in a calendar year, 70% of the truck's total kilometres was on the agricultural property. We consider the truck to be used primarily on an agricultural property.
As it meets one of the exemptions, the business is entitled to a fuel tax credit for the fuel used in the vehicle despite it not meeting the specified environmental criteria.
Jane (from Example 1 of this Ruling), operates a similar diesel tray truck that also does not meet the specified environmental criteria. She uses the truck around the agricultural property in the same way as John.
During the harvest season, this truck is used to transport the harvested crop on a public road to a storage facility which is approximately 20 kilometres away from the property. The harvest season lasts for approximately four weeks of the calendar year.
Jane estimates that in a calendar year, 60% of the truck's total kilometres travelled occur during the harvest season on public roads. The remaining 40% of the total kilometres are undertaken on the agricultural property.
However, as the truck is used every day on the property, a review of the time the vehicle is used both on and off the agricultural property shows that it is used more than 50% of the time on the property over the calendar year. The truck has, therefore, been used primarily on the agricultural property.
As it meets one of the exemptions, the business is entitled to a fuel tax credit for the fuel used in the vehicle despite it not meeting the specified environmental criteria in subsection 41-25(1).
Jesse runs a grain haulage business using a number of vehicles including an old 1995 Heavy Combination (HC) truck with a GVM of 10 tonnes. All vehicles are regularly serviced in line with maintenance schedules that meet the specified environmental criteria.
On the first of every month, Jesse buys diesel fuel for the fleet, which is stored in an on-site tank. Fuel tax credits are calculated and claimed monthly.
Jesse's drivers keep records of fuel usage by recording the date, time, vehicle and the amount of fuel taken each time they fill a truck from the tank.
On 1 July, Jesse buys a new truck and decides to retire the 1995 HC truck. Jesse also cancels the scheduled 3 August maintenance service on the old truck (so it no longer meets its environmental criteria) and starts a fresh maintenance schedule with the new truck.
At the peak of the harvesting season in mid-August, one of the haulage vehicles has a breakdown, and Jesse decides to use the old truck while waiting for the vehicle to be repaired. Some fuel that was acquired for use in the new truck was instead used in the old truck. Jesse had already claimed a fuel tax credit for this fuel on the assumption it would be used in the new truck.
Once Jesse becomes aware that the fuel has in fact been used in the old truck, Jesse is required to record an increasing adjustment. This is because the fuel has been used in the old truck at a time when the vehicle no longer satisfied the environmental criteria as the vehicle had not undergone its scheduled maintenance service.
Jesse is required to include the increasing fuel tax adjustment in her activity statement for the tax period in which she became aware of the change in use of the fuel. [12]
When the final Ruling is issued, it is proposed to apply both before and after its date of issue. However, the Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10 Public Rulings ).