Issue
Is a statutory Government Owned Corporation (GOC) a 'State or Territory authority' as defined in subsection 164(7) of the Customs Act 1901 ?
Decision
Yes. A GOC is a 'State or Territory authority' as defined in subsection 164(7) of the Customs Act.
Facts
The entity is a statutory GOC.
The entity is a utility that provides an essential service to customers including irrigators, water boards, local governments, power stations, mining, industrial and manufacturing companies.
The utility's GOC status was effected by state government enactments.
The GOC's shareholders are government Ministers and dividends are paid to them on behalf of the relevant state government.
Reasons for Decision
The term 'State or Territory authority' is defined in section 164(7) of the Customs Act as follows:
State or Territory authority means: (a) an instrumentality of a State or Territory; or (b) an authority or body established for the purpose of a State or Territory by or under a law of the State or Territory
The meaning of the terms 'authority' and 'public authority' was considered in Re NSW Grains Board; (Smith as administrator of the NSW Grains Board) v. Lawrence [2002] NSWSC 913 ( Grains Board Case ). It was held that, among other things, for an entity to be an authority it was necessary for it to perform a traditional or inalienable function of government and have government authority for doing so. To be a 'public authority', it was held that an entity must be authorised to exercise power or command and it cannot be a private body established for profit.
In this instance, the entity provides services that are of critical importance to customers including irrigators, water boards, local governments, power stations, mining, industrial and manufacturing companies. The government has, via enabling legislation, conveyed on the entity the power to perform a traditional or inalienable function of government.
The entity is not a profit making entity in the usual commercial sense. Although it has shareholders, who receive dividends, these dividends are received on behalf of the relevant state government.
Given these factors, it is clear that the entity is an authority... established for the purpose of a State or Territory by or under a law of the State or Territory. Therefore, the requirements of the definition of State or Territory authority in paragraph 164(7)(b) of the Customs Act are satisfied.
Even if the entity were not an authority, the definition of State or Territory authority in subsection 164(7) of the Customs Act extends to bodies established for the purpose of a State or Territory by or under a law of the State or Territory. The term 'body' is presumably intended to be interpreted broadly. The above discussion has already established that the entity was established for the purpose of a State pursuant to a law of that State. Given the broad meaning of the term 'body', the entity would clearly meet the definition of a State or Territory authority, even if it were not an authority.
Therefore the entity is a State or Territory authority as defined in subsection 164(7) of the Customs Act.