Compare documents

No. 'Roll-over' in paragraph 124-795(2)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) does not refer only to a replacement asset roll-over listed in section 112-115 of the ITAA 1997 or to a same asset roll-over listed in section 112-150 of the ITAA 1997. 'Roll-over' can also refer to a provision that operates in a similar manner to defer tax recognition by disregarding a capital gain or loss and providing for a cost base/reduced cost base transfer.

In 2003, Lisa acquired 1, 000 options to acquire shares in an Australian listed public company .

In 2004, this company was acquired by another Australian public company. Under an arrangement which satisfied the conditions for roll-over under Subdivision 124-M, the options Lisa held in the original company were exchanged for options to acquire shares in the acquiring company .

Any capital gain Lisa might make from exercising her options to acquire shares in the acquiring company would be disregarded: subsection 134-1(4) of the ITAA 1997. The Commissioner takes the view that Lisa is entitled to choose scrip for scrip roll-over relief because the capital gain would be disregarded under a 'roll-over' .

This Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, it does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of the Determination (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).

Scrip for scrip roll-over is not generally available if any capital gain a taxpayer might make from a replacement interest would be disregarded: paragraph 124-795(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997. The reason for this is that any capital gain deferred on the scrip for scrip roll-over would never be captured on a later realisation of the replacement interest. Thus, scrip for scrip roll-over would not be available if a replacement interest acquired under a scrip for scrip arrangement were trading stock or a share in a PDF (pooled development fund). Subsequent capital gains from these assets would be disregarded under sections 118-25 and 118-13 of the ITAA 1997 respectively.

There is an exception, however, if a capital gain that might be made on a replacement interest is disregarded because of roll-over. In such a case, the taxing point would only be deferred.

'Roll-over' is not a defined term in the ITAA 1997.

The capital gains tax (CGT) provisions refer specifically to same-asset and replacement-asset rollovers as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997. Broadly, these roll-overs enable taxpayers to disregard gains or losses made in relation to CGT assets until the happening of a later CGT event. They also provide for the cost base and reduced cost base of the original asset to be transferred to a different taxpayer (same-asset roll-over) or to another asset (replacement-asset rollover).

However, in the statutory context in which the expression 'roll-over' is used in paragraph 124-795(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997, the Commissioner takes the view that it does not only refer to the roll-overs that are listed in the tables in section 112-115 and 112-150 of the ITAA 1997. In the Commissioner's view, 'roll-over' includes any provision that has the effect of deferring, but not eliminating, tax recognition of a capital gain and providing for a cost base/reduced cost base transfer.

For example, Subdivision 130-C of the ITAA 1997 operates as a form of roll-over when a convertible interest is converted. Any capital gain or loss from the conversion is disregarded under subsection 130-60(3) of the ITAA 1997. Subsection 130-60(1) of the ITAA 1997 ensures that the cost base/reduced cost base of the converting interest is included in the cost base/reduced cost base of the shares or units acquired as a result of the conversion.

Similarly, Division 128 of the ITAA 1997 provides a form of roll-over in respect of the assets owned by an individual when they die.

Other provisions operate to confer a roll-over when options or rights are exercised.

If a narrow interpretation of the term roll-over were adopted, it would mean that scrip for scrip roll-over would not be available for taxpayers who exchange options in one company for options in another company (because a capital gain from the exercise of the option would be disregarded). This is clearly not consistent with the policy intent of Subdivision 124-M of the ITAA 1997 (see paragraph 2.17 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Capital Gains Tax) Bill 1999).