Compare documents

1 Is the vehicle exempt from the car limit under section 40-230 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

1 Yes. This ruling applies for the following periods : Year ended DD MM 20XX Year ended DD MM 20XX Year ending DD MM 20XX The scheme commenced on: DD MM 20XX

You purchased vehicle for an amount that exceeds the car limit during the relevant income year. The vehicle is a dual cab utility vehicle with 5 seats. You have provided the specifications of the vehicle's weight, including the gross vehicle mass and kerb weight. The vehicle has been significantly modified, including the replacement of the factory tray with a fully enclosed cabinetry for tools and the suspension being upgraded. With the upgraded suspension, the vehicle's carry capacity remains under 1,000kg. The vehicle is used in your construction business and is used solely for work-related purposes.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 40-230 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 40-230(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 995-1 Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 8(2)

The car limit Subsection 40-230(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that the first element of the cost of a car that is 'designed mainly for carrying passengers' is reduced to the car limit for the income year in which you started to hold it if its cost exceeds that limit. The car limit is contained in subsection 40-230(3) of the ITAA 1997. The car limit is contained in subsection 40-230(3) of the ITAA 1997. The car limit for the relevant income year was $X. 'Car' is defined under section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997. It is a motor vehicle (except a motorcycle or similar vehicle) mainly designed to carry a load of less than one tonne and fewer than 9 passengers. If the vehicle you have purchased carries less than 9 passengers and has a payload capacity of less than one tonne, it is classified as a car and will be subject to the car cost limit stipulated in section 40-230 of the ITAA 1997. The one tonne limit relates to the maximum load your vehicle can carry, also known as the payload capacity. The payload capacity is the gross vehicle mass (GVM) as specified on the compliance plate by the manufacturer, reduced by the basic kerb weight of the vehicle. Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2024

Fringe Benefits Tax: dual cab vehicles eligibility for exemption where private use is limited to certain work-related travel (MT 2024) states that a dual cab that has a designed load carrying capacity of less than one tonne may still qualify for the work-related use exemption under subsection 8(2) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA 1986) if the vehicle is not designed for the principal purpose of carrying passengers. In determining whether a dual cab vehicle is designed principally for carrying passengers, MT 2024 refers to the approach considered in clause 4.5.2 of the Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rules - Definitions and Vehicle Categories) 2005 (ADR). According to the ADR, a vehicle constructed for both the carriage of persons and the carriage of goods shall be considered to be primarily for the carriage of goods if the number of seating positions multiplied by 68 kilograms is less than 50% of the difference between the 'gross vehicle mass' and the 'unladen mass' (also referred to as 'kerb weight').

If the total passenger weight exceeds the remaining 'load' capacity, the vehicle is to be treated as being designed for the principal purpose of carrying passengers. For example, if a vehicle has a gross vehicle weight of 2,000kg, a kerb weight of 1,400kg, and has a seating capacity of 5, the vehicle would be considered to be a vehicle designed principally for the carriage of passengers. This is because the total load capacity is 600kg of which the majority, 340kg, would be absorbed by its designed passenger carrying capacity. This test can be applied in determining whether a car is 'mainly designed for carrying passengers' as stipulated in subsection 40-230(1) of the ITAA 1997. This is because the term 'mainly designed' is broader than the term 'principally designed' set out in sub-section 8(2) of the FBTAA 1986. Further guidance for determining the principal purpose for which a car was designed is contained in Taxation Determination TD 94/19

Fringe benefits tax: is the method outlined in Taxation Ruling MT 2024 appropriate for determining whether a vehicle, other than a dual or crew cab, is 'designed for the principal purpose of carrying passengers' and thereby ineligible for the work-related use exemption available under subsection 8(2) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986? (TD 94/19). TD 94/19 confirms that for dual or crew cab vehicles, the method outlined in MT 2024 applies. For other vehicles, the Commissioner advises that regard should be had to the following factors: •                the appearance and presentation of the vehicle; •                any relevant promotional literature; •                the emphasis evident in marketing; •                the vehicle's specifications; •                load carrying capacity; and •                passenger carrying capacity. Application to your circumstances In your circumstances, the vehicle has a payload capacity of Xkg. The vehicle is designed to carry 5 passengers meaning that Xkg is designed to be absorbed by its passenger carrying capacity, leaving Xkg available.

As the majority of the payload capacity is not allocated to passenger carrying capacity, the Commissioner considers that the vehicle is not 'mainly designed' for carrying passengers. The car limit under section 40-230 of the ITAA 1997 therefore does not apply to the vehicle.