Compare documents

No.

Section 36A is founded on the existence of undivided fractional interests in trading assets and a change in those interests. The section does not apply to all changes in interests in trading assets. FC of T v . Westraders Pty Ltd 80 ATC 4357, per Mason J at 4367 and 4368; (1980) 11 ATR 24 at 36 and 37 and Glenfield Estates Pty Ltd v . FC of T 88 ATC 4548, per Lockhart J, with whom Wilcox and French JJ agreed, at 4561; (1988) 19 ATR 1426, at 1441 broadly support the view that section 36A comprehensively applies to changes in undivided fractional interests in trading assets.

If a sole trader declares himself or herself to be such a trustee, there is no change in any undivided fractional interests in the trading assets. The sole trader who legally (and beneficially) owned the trading assets, before the declaration, has a legal interest in the assets after the change - he or she retains legal title to the assets (albeit as a trustee) but has divested himself or herself of a beneficial interest in the assets. Because there is no change in any undivided fractional interests in the trading assets and the sole trader has no undivided fractional interest in the trading assets after the after the declaration of trust, subsection 36A(1) does not apply.

Section 36 also does not apply to the declaration of trust because the sole trader did not transfer the entirety of his or her ownership of the assets. Section 36 is concerned with the disposal of the whole or part of the assets of a business. When section 36 speaks of disposing of the assets of a business, Rose v . FC of T (1951) 84 CLR 118; 9 ATD 334 makes it clear that section 36 is speaking of a transfer of the proprietor's entirety of ownership of the assets. Because the sole trader's entire ownership in the assets is not disposed of on the declaration of trust by the sole trader (the sole trader retaining a legal interest in the assets), the same kind of difficulty that arose in the Rose case is present and section 36 cannot apply.