Compare documents

The draft Ruling explains the goods and services tax ( GST ) treatment of amounts (for convenience, exit payments ) which a resident becomes liable to pay the operator of a retirement village when the resident's interest in the village terminates.

In this context, the resident's 'interest' is a right to possession of residential premises under a lease or licence.

All legislative references in this draft Ruling are to the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) unless otherwise specified.

The draft Ruling does not specifically address: • exit payments made by residents of a retirement village where the resident holds a freehold interest; • apportionment of input tax credits; • the development, construction, sale or leasing of retirement villages, nursing homes, hostels or boarding homes; [1] • the activities of charitable institutions under Subdivision 38-G including supplies of retirement village accommodation under section 38-260; and • care services provided in a retirement village.

In order to determine the GST treatment of an exit payment in a lease arrangement, it is necessary to consider: • any supply or supplies made by the operator; [2] and • the extent of the connection, if any, between such a supply or supplies and the payment. [3]

Where an exit payment is made in connection with a supply, it is 'consideration' for that supply under section 9-15. In order to determine whether an exit payment has the necessary nexus with any supply, the starting point is to examine the legal arrangements between the parties.

For GST purposes, consideration includes any payment in connection with a supply. [4] The connection or nexus of an exit payment to any supply requires objective evaluation of the legal arrangements between the retirement village operator and the resident in question. [5]

Legal arrangements between the parties are the natural starting point when determining which entity is making a particular supply and who are the recipients of that supply. [6] The legal effect of these arrangements is determined by a proper reading of the arrangements as a whole, rather than simply by reference to particular labels or descriptions adopted by the parties. [7]

Where a nexus between consideration and a particular supply is expressed in the legal arrangements, this may not be conclusive. However, it is a factor taken into account in determining whether the consideration in question is provided for that particular supply. For example, a description of nexus which is artificial or contrived in all the circumstances will not be determinative. [8] Whether or not this is the case however depends on the facts and circumstances of each situation.

In a lease arrangement, the operator makes input taxed or GST-free supplies to residents, and may also make taxable supplies.

Input taxed supplies to the resident in a lease arrangement may include supplies of: • residential premises by way of lease or licence; and • services which are integral, ancillary or incidental to the lease or licence ( incidental services ).

Incidental services are to be regarded as part of an input taxed or composite supply, the dominant part of which comprises the residential premises provided under the lease or licence.

Whether a service is incidental to another supply depends on the facts of each case. A service may be regarded as incidental where it is designed to ensure, facilitate or enhance the resident's enjoyment of the lease or licence, but is not provided as an end in itself. [9] The nature of a service is assessed according to its true character rather than simply by reference to a label or description given to it by the parties.

Attachment A contains a non-exhaustive list of incidental services.

Supplies of care services and serviced apartments by an operator of a retirement village are GST-free when subsections 38-25(3) and 38-25(4A) [10] apply. Consequently, exit payments made in this situation are made in connection with GST-free supplies, which include those services which are integral, ancillary or incidental to the supply of residential premises and care services.

An operator may also make taxable supplies to the resident. Taxable supplies consist of services which are not incidental services ( non-incidental services ) and are not GST-free under subsection 38-25(3). These include optional services which have no necessary connection to the resident's ability to enjoy residential premises under the lease or licence.

Attachment B contains a non-exhaustive list of non-incidental services.

Exit payments are treated as consideration for a supply of residential premises, except to the extent that an objective assessment in all the circumstances indicates that they are consideration for some other supply or supplies. Supplies of residential premises in a retirement village by way of lease or licence are input taxed unless the supply of the premises is a supply of serviced apartments that are GST-free under subsection 38-25(4A).

Neither the method by which an exit payment is to be determined nor the variables used to calculate an exit payment are necessarily decisive in identifying the supply or supplies for which the exit payment is consideration. [11] There may be situations, however, where the method of calculation prescribed for an exit payment, in all the circumstances is sufficient to establish nexus with a supply other than a supply of residential premises.

Subject to contrary indications within the legal arrangements, an exit payment is consideration wholly for supplies that would be input taxed where: • the operator does not provide services other than incidental services; or • the operator provides non-incidental services but: - the resident is liable to provide separate consideration for them; and - the value of that consideration is not significantly less than the market value of the services.

By way of contrast, an exit payment is treated as consideration wholly or partly for supplies that would be taxable where: • the resident is not liable to provide any separate consideration for those services; or • the value of the separate consideration they provide is significantly less than the market value of the services.

Where an exit payment is consideration for both non-taxable (input taxed or GST-free) and taxable supplies, or consideration for a mixed supply, the exit payment should be apportioned between the taxable and non-taxable components. [12] The apportionment method adopted must be reasonable in all the circumstances.

When the final Ruling is issued, it is proposed to apply both before and after its date of issue. However, the Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Ruling (see paragraphs 75 to 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).

An exit payment is generally made by a resident of a retirement village to the village operator on exit from the village. The fee is commonly known as a deferred management fee (DMF), but may also be referred to as an exit or termination fee. Other exit payments may include selling fees, capital improvement fees, renovation fees and cleaning fees.

An exit payment consisting of a DMF is commonly calculated in the following ways: • lease arrangement - a percentage of the entry contribution made by the exiting resident or • a percentage of the entry contribution made by the new incoming resident In some situations the calculation may be adjusted with reference to the increase or decrease in the value of the residential unit.

In order to determine the GST treatment of an exit payment, it is necessary to consider: • any supply or supplies made by the operator; and • the extent of the connection, if any, between such a supply or supplies and the payment

Where an exit payment has a sufficient connection with a supply it is 'consideration' for that supply under section 9-15. In order to determiner whether an exit payment has the necessary nexus with any supply, the starting point is to examine the legal arrangements between the parties.

For GST purposes consideration includes any payment in connection with a supply. [13] The connection or nexus of an exit payment to any supply is to be determined by an objective evaluation of the legal arrangements between the retirement village operator and the resident in question. [14]

Legal arrangements between the parties are the natural starting point when determining the entity making a particular supply and who are the recipient of that supply. [15] The legal effect of these arrangements is determined by a proper reading of the arrangements as a whole, rather than simply by reference to particular labels or descriptions adopted by the parties. [16]

The parties cannot, by the mere device of labelling, either confer a particular legal character on a relationship that it does not truly possess or deny it a character that it does possess. [17] As Gray J stated in Transport Workers Union of Australia : A court will always look at all of the terms of the contract, to determine its true essence, and will not be bound by the express choice of the parties as to the label to be attached to it. ...the parties cannot create something which has every feature of a rooster, but call it a duck and insist that everybody else recognise it as a duck. [18]

Labels or descriptions given to exit payments must be attributed their proper weight in the context of the legal arrangements. [19] This may lead to the label or description being disregarded entirely; or to its being given full force and effect. In all cases, however, a label will be given a weight appropriate to the circumstances. Labels are not a substitute for legal analysis.

An expressed nexus between consideration and a particular supply may not be conclusive, but is a factor taken into account in determining whether the consideration in question is provided for that particular supply. For example, a description of nexus which is artificial or contrived in all the circumstances is not determinative. [20]

In Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Luxottica Retail Australia Pty Ltd , the Full Federal Court looked at the allocation of the price of a pair of spectacles between GST-free prescription lenses and taxable frames, in circumstances where a discount was only applied to the frames. The fact that the pricing methodology was not 'contrived or artificial' was one of the circumstances taken into account in concluding that it was correct to allocate the discount to the frames only. [21]

In order to determine the GST treatment of an exit payment in a lease arrangement, it is necessary to consider: • any supply or supplies made by the operator; and • the extent, if any, to which the exit payment in question represents consideration for any one of those supplies.

In a lease arrangement, the operator makes input taxed or GST-free supplies to the resident and may also make taxable supplies.

Input taxed supplies to the resident include: • residential premises by way of lease or licence • services which are integral, ancillary or incidental to the lease ( incidental services ); that are in each case not GST-free under section 38-25.

Where the supply by way of lease arrangement, that is not the supply of a serviced apartment covered by subsection 38-25(4A), the operator makes an input taxed supply of residential premises by way of lease or licence over a unit. [22] The operator also makes a supply of a licence over common areas in the village. This also involves an input taxed supply, [23] since the common areas are part of the 'residential premises' made available to the resident under the residence agreement. [24]

In a lease arrangement, the operator may also provide incidental services. These services are integral, ancillary or incidental to the supply of residential premises. They are part of an input taxed, composite supply, [25] the dominant part of which comprises the residential premises provided under the lease or licence. In this context, services are considered to be 'incidental services' where they are 'ancillary' to the lease or licence in the sense described in Customs and Excise Commissioners v. Madgett & Baldwin . [26] ... a service is ancillary if, first, it contributes to the proper performance of the principal service and second, it takes up a marginal proportion of the package price compared to the principal service. It does not constitute an object for customers or a service sought for its own sake, but a means of better enjoying the principal service.

The question whether a service is integral, ancillary or incidental to the supply of residential premises by way of lease depends on the circumstances of each case. No single factor provides the test for determining whether a part of a supply is integral, ancillary or incidental to another part of the supply. In the present context, an incidental service is designed to ensure, facilitate or enhance the resident's enjoyment of the lease or licence but is not provided as an end in itself.

The connection between a service and the supply of residential premises is assessed by reference to the true character of the service, rather than the labels or forms of words used by the parties. Accordingly, the parties cannot make a service integral, ancillary or incidental to the supply of accommodation merely by stating that it has that character in the agreement.

Supplies of serviced apartments and care services in a retirement village are GST-free when subsections 38-25(3) and 38-25(4A) [27] apply. Consequently, exit payments made in this situation are made in connection with GST-free supplies, including services which are integral, ancillary or incidental to the supply of residential premises and care services.

The operator may also make taxable supplies to the resident. Taxable supplies in this context include services ( non-incidental services ) which are not incidental to supply of residential premises by way of lease or licence. Non-incidental services may include optional services which have no necessary connection to the resident's ability to enjoy residential premises under the lease or licence.

Attachment B contains a non-exhaustive list of non-incidental services.

Exit payments are treated as consideration for a supply of residential premises, except to the extent that an objective assessment of all the circumstances indicates that they are consideration for some other supply or supplies. Supplies of residential premises in a lease or licence arrangement are input taxed unless the premises are GST-free serviced apartments under subsection 38-25(4A).

Neither the method by which an exit payment is to be determined nor the variables used to calculate an exit payment are necessarily decisive in identifying the supply or supplies for which the exit payment is consideration. There may be situations, however, where the method of calculation prescribed for an exit payment, after considering the objective circumstances, may be sufficient to establish nexus with a supply other than a supply of residential premises.

Exit payments are commonly calculated by reference to the duration of the lease or licence rather than the level of services actually provided. Unless particular terms of the legal arrangement indicate otherwise, it may be taken that such exit payments are, to some extent, consideration for the supply of residential premises, or the composite supply of residential premises and incidental services.

Unless particular terms of the legal agreement indicate otherwise, an exit payment is wholly consideration for supplies that are input taxed (or GST-free where the supplies covered by section 38-25) where: • the operator does not provide services other than incidental services; or • the operator provides non-incidental services but: - the resident is liable to provide separate consideration in respect of them; and - the value of that consideration is not significantly less than the market value of the services.

In such cases, the connection between the exit payment and the making of supplies of residential premises and/or incidental services may be inferred from the lack of any such connection between the payment and non-incidental services.

By way of contrast, it may be that an exit payment is consideration for the taxable supply of non-incidental services where the operator provides non-incidental services and: • residents do not provide any separate consideration for those services; or • the value of the separate consideration they provide is significantly less than the market value of the services.

In the absence of any contrary indications, a part of an exit payment that is calculated by express reference to the extent of (non incidental) services performed by the operator would be consideration for those services rather than for the supply of the premises.

Where an exit payment is consideration for both non-taxable (input taxed or GST-free) and taxable supplies, or consideration for a mixed supply, the exit payment in question should be apportioned between the taxable and non-taxable components. [28] The apportionment method adopted must be reasonable in all circumstances. [29]

You are invited to comment on this draft Ruling. Please forward your comments to the contact officer by the due date.

A compendium of comments is also prepared for the consideration of the relevant Rulings Panel or relevant tax officers. An edited version (names and identifying information removed) of the compendium of comments will also be prepared to: • provide responses to persons providing comments; and • publish on the ATO office website at www.ato.gov.au. Please advise if you do not want your comments included in the edited version of the compendium. Due date: 16 April 2012 Contact officer details have been removed following publication of the final ruling.

The following is a detailed contents list for this draft Ruling: Paragraph What this draft Ruling is about 1 Ruling 5 General principles 5 Lease arrangements 10 Supplies made 10 Input taxed Supplies 11 GST-free supplies 15 Taxable supplies 16 Payment as consideration for supplies made 18 Payment wholly or partly consideration for input taxed supplies 18 Payment wholly or partly consideration for taxable supplies 21 Apportionment between taxable and non-taxable components 22 Date of effect 23 Appendix 1 - Explanation 24 General principles 24 Express statements 29 Lease arrangements 34 Input taxed supplies 36 Residential premises 37 Incidental services 38 GST-free supplies 41 Taxable supplies 42 Payment as consideration for supplies made 44 Payment wholly or partly consideration for input taxed supplies 44 Payment wholly or partly consideration for taxable supplies 49 Apportionment between taxable and non-taxable components 51 Appendix 2 - Your comments 52 Appendix 3 - Detailed contents list 54 Attachment A - Incidental supplies Page 17 Attachment B - Non-incidental supplies Page 18