Compare documents

If the money paid and market value of any property given by a person for the issue of shares in a company exceeds their market value, does the market value substitution rule in section 112-20 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) apply in working out the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of the shares?

Yes. The market value substitution rule in section 112-20 of the ITAA 1997 applies if the person and the issuing company do not deal at arm's length in relation to the acquisition of the shares and what is paid for them exceeds their market value.

A company has a net asset deficiency and needs additional funds to continue business operations.

A shareholder in the company contributes $1 million to the company in exchange for the issue of additional shares. The market value of the additional shares is $200,000.

The shareholder and the company are not dealing at arm's length in relation to the acquisition of the additional shares.

Under the general cost base and reduced cost base rules, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of an asset is the sum of the amount paid (or required to be paid) and the market value of property given (or required to be given) in respect of acquiring it (subsections 110-25(2) and 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997.) The general rules may be modified if the market value substitution rule in section 112-20 of the ITAA 1997 applies.

The market value substitution rule generally applies where parties do not deal at arm's length in connection with the acquisition of an asset (paragraph 112-20(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997). However in a non-arm's length dealing involving the acquisition of an asset from an entity as a result of something done by that entity that did not constitute a CGT event happening to it, the market value is substituted only if the amount paid for the asset is more than its market value (subsection 112-20(2) of the ITAA 1997).

A shareholder who is issued with a share acquires that share without a CGT event happening to the company.

Whether parties have dealt at arm's length, and what the market value of a share is, are questions of fact that must be determined in any particular case. The following sentence was removed from the above paragraph on 6 June 2003 The question of whether parties that are not at arm's length, have dealt at arm's length, is to be determined by considering whether the outcome of their dealing is a matter of real bargaining ( Trustee for the Estate of AW Furse No 5 Will Trust v. FC of T 91 ATC 4007 ; (1990) 21 ATR 1123; Granby Pty Ltd v. F C of T 95 ATC 4240; (1995) 30 ATR 400; Collis v. FC of T 96 ATC 4831; (1996) 33 ATR 438).

The market value of shares may reflect assets that are not brought to account for accounting purposes (for example, internally generated goodwill), so the fact that there is a net asset deficiency on the balance sheet may not be determinative. Also, the market value of shares in a company may be affected by other factors apart from a current net asset position.

The market value substitution rule in section 112-20 of the ITAA 1997 will apply in respect of the first element of cost base and reduced cost base of the shares in this case because: • no CGT event happened to the company when the shareholder acquired the shares • the shareholder and the issuing company did not deal at arm's length with each other in connection with the share issue; and • the amount paid ($1 million) was more than the market value of the shares ($200,000).

Note.

This approach will also apply where a person lends money to a company, and the amount of the loan exceeds the market value of the asset that the lender acquires under the transaction - that is, the right to receive payments under the loan - when it comes into existence.