Compare documents

Is the first element of cost of a depreciating asset the taxpayer started to hold, as worked out under Subdivision 40-C of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), reduced by an appropriate portion of the grants the taxpayer received to finance the purchase of such assets?

No. The cost of a depreciating asset the taxpayer started to hold is, pursuant to item 1 of the table in subsection 40-185(1) of the ITAA 1997, the amount the taxpayer paid to acquire the asset and that amount is not reduced by any portion of the grants the taxpayer received to finance the purchase of such assets.

The taxpayer received a number of grants from a state government body for the specific purpose of acquiring certain depreciating assets used in the course of and for the purposes of their business. The taxpayer complied with the strict requirement that the grants only be expended for the specific purpose for which they were paid. The grants are included in the assessable income of the taxpayer as ordinary income.

The amount of each grant is determined strictly on an objective basis. That is, although there are general rules that guide the taxpayer's decisions in respect of asset acquisitions, the grants are not specifically linked to the quantity or quality of the assets acquired, their cost or to any particular asset. The grants simply provide a source of finance from which the assets are acquired. Generally, the taxpayer acquires the assets from commercial retail sources.

The cost of a depreciating asset is a component in working out the amount you can deduct for its decline in value under Division 40 of the ITAA 1997. The cost of a depreciating asset you hold consists of two elements, the first and second element of cost, and is worked out under Subdivision 40-C of the ITAA 1997 (section 40-175 of the ITAA 1997).

The first element of cost is worked out as at the time you start to hold the asset (subsection 40-180(1) of the ITAA 1997). Except in special cases where the first element of cost is attributed specifically by a particular item in paragraph 40-180(2) of the ITAA 1997, the first element of cost is the amount you are taken to have paid to hold a depreciating asset pursuant to section 40-185 of the ITAA 1997.

As no item in the table in subsection 40-180(2) of the ITAA 1997 applies in this case, the first element of cost of a depreciating asset the taxpayer starts to hold is worked out under section 40-185 of the ITAA 1997.

Item 1 of the table in subsection 40-185(1) of the ITAA 1997 includes in first element of cost an amount the taxpayer pays to hold a depreciating asset. The taxpayer clearly pays an amount to purchase the asset and, in this case, to start holding the asset. The grants simply provide a source from which those payments are made. There is little other connection between the general pool of grant money available to purchase such assets and the particular depreciating asset actually acquired.

The cost of a depreciating asset is adjusted in certain circumstances. For example: • the cost of a depreciating asset is reduced by any portion of it that is not of a capital nature (section 40-220 of the ITAA 1997). • to prevent double deductions, the cost of a depreciating asset is reduced by any portion of it that you have or can deduct other than under Divisions 40 or 328 of the ITAA 1997 (section 40-215 of the ITAA 1997).

None of the adjustments to cost provided in Subdivision 40-C of the ITAA 1997 apply to the cost of a depreciating asset the taxpayer started to hold. Therefore, there is no basis on which to reduce the first element of cost of a depreciating asset the taxpayer started to hold by any part of the grants they received to finance the purchase of such assets.

It follows that the cost of a depreciating asset the taxpayer starts to hold, by paying an amount of money to acquire the asset, is that amount, and that amount is not reduced by any portion of the grants received by the taxpayer for the purpose of acquiring such assets.