Compare documents

Has any CGT event in Division 104 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) happened to enable the taxpayer to make a capital loss on their investment, made through Thai securities firms, in shares in non-resident companies?

No. On the evidence available no CGT event in Division 104 of the ITAA 1997 has happened to the taxpayer's shares. The taxpayer is unable to claim a capital loss at this time.

The taxpayer received an offer to invest in a non-resident company through a securities firm based in Thailand. The taxpayer forwarded US dollars to the firm's bank accounts overseas. The taxpayer has received share certificates for their investment.

The taxpayer attempted to telephone the securities firm to dispose of the shares in the company. The taxpayer also sent instructions to this firm to dispose of the shares but these instructions were never acted upon.

The taxpayer has not received any notice that the company has been placed in liquidation or is in the process of being wound up or that their shares have ended.

Section 102-20 of the ITAA 1997 provides that you make a capital gain or capital loss if and only if a CGT event happens. The gain or loss is made at the time of the CGT event.

The CGT events that may be relevant to the taxpayer's situation are:

CGT event A1 - Disposal of a CGT asset (section 104-10 of the ITAA 1997);

CGT event G3 - Liquidator declares shares worthless (section 104-145 of the ITAA 1997); and

CGT event C2 - Cancellation, surrender and similar endings (section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997).

As the taxpayer has not been able to contact the firm to dispose of their shares in the non-resident company, CGT event A1 has not occurred. As there is no evidence that a liquidator has been appointed or made a declaration that there is no likelihood that the shareholders in the company will receive any further distribution in the course of winding up the company then CGT event G3 has not occurred.

CGT event C2 has also not occurred in these circumstances. The only circumstance that CGT event C2 may have occurred would be if the shares ended by being redeemed or cancelled in terms of paragraph 104-25(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997. There is no evidence that this has happened.

Further it is considered that it is not possible to abandon or surrender a share in terms of paragraph 104-25(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997. The most appropriate CGT event to apply in this circumstance is CGT event G3.

As no CGT events have occurred in relation to the taxpayer's shares, they have not made a capital loss at this time. The taxpayer may make a capital loss when they are able to establish that either CGT events A1, C2 or G3 occur.

The taxpayer has been unable to determine whether their investment in these firms has resulted in the acquisition of legitimate shares. In the event that the shares are not legitimate, the taxpayer may have a right to sue the securities firms. The implications of this are outlined in ATOID 2001/799. Note: Taxation Laws Amendment (2004 Measures No. 6) Act 2005 has extended the scope of CGT event G3 in section 104-145 of the ITAA 1997. The event now happens if a liquidator or an administrator makes an appropriate written declaration in respect of valueless shares or financial instruments. The amendments apply to declarations made after 21 March 2005. These amendments would not, however, affect the decision in this case if the taxpayer had not received a written declaration from an administrator or a liquidator that the shares were worthless. [HISTORY: This ATO ID has been amended by adding a note which explains the changes made to CGT event G3 in section 104-145 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 which applies to declarations made by liquidators or administrators after 21 March 2005.]